mtd: nand: ecc-hamming: Stop using raw NAND structures

This code is meant to be reused by the SPI-NAND core. Now that the
driver has been cleaned and reorganized, use a generic ECC engine
object to store the driver's data instead of accessing members of the
nand_chip structure. This means adding proper init/cleanup helpers.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200929230124.31491-17-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com

1 files changed, 60 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index 32e9870a2cf8..c36d2d4a72d5 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -5139,6 +5139,46 @@ static void nand_scan_ident_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
 	kfree(chip->parameters.onfi);
 }
 
+int rawnand_sw_hamming_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
+	struct nand_ecc_sw_hamming_conf *engine_conf;
+	struct nand_device *base = &chip->base;
+
+	base->ecc.user_conf.engine_type = NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_SOFT;
+	base->ecc.user_conf.algo = NAND_ECC_ALGO_HAMMING;
+	base->ecc.user_conf.strength = chip->ecc.strength;
+	base->ecc.user_conf.step_size = chip->ecc.size;
+
+	if (base->ecc.user_conf.strength != 1 ||
+	    (base->ecc.user_conf.step_size != 256 &&
+	     base->ecc.user_conf.step_size != 512)) {
+		pr_err("%s: unsupported strength or step size\n", __func__);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	engine_conf = kzalloc(sizeof(*engine_conf), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!engine_conf)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	engine_conf->code_size = 3;
+	engine_conf->nsteps = mtd->writesize / base->ecc.user_conf.step_size;
+
+	if (chip->ecc.options & NAND_ECC_SOFT_HAMMING_SM_ORDER)
+		engine_conf->sm_order = true;
+
+	base->ecc.ctx.priv = engine_conf;
+
+	chip->ecc.size = base->ecc.ctx.conf.step_size;
+	chip->ecc.strength = base->ecc.ctx.conf.strength;
+	chip->ecc.total = base->ecc.ctx.total;
+	chip->ecc.steps = engine_conf->nsteps;
+	chip->ecc.bytes = engine_conf->code_size;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rawnand_sw_hamming_init);
+
 int rawnand_sw_hamming_calculate(struct nand_chip *chip,
 				 const unsigned char *buf,
 				 unsigned char *code)
@@ -5160,6 +5200,14 @@ int rawnand_sw_hamming_correct(struct nand_chip *chip,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rawnand_sw_hamming_correct);
 
+void rawnand_sw_hamming_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
+{
+	struct nand_device *base = &chip->base;
+
+	kfree(base->ecc.ctx.priv);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rawnand_sw_hamming_cleanup);
+
 int rawnand_sw_bch_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
 	struct nand_device *base = &chip->base;
@@ -5303,6 +5351,12 @@ static int nand_set_ecc_soft_ops(struct nand_chip *chip)
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_HAMMING_SMC))
 			ecc->options |= NAND_ECC_SOFT_HAMMING_SM_ORDER;
 
+		ret = rawnand_sw_hamming_init(chip);
+		if (ret) {
+			WARN(1, "Hamming ECC initialization failed!\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+
 		return 0;
 	case NAND_ECC_ALGO_BCH:
 		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_ECC_SW_BCH)) {
@@ -5996,9 +6050,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_with_ids);
  */
 void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
-	if (chip->ecc.engine_type == NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_SOFT &&
-	    chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_ALGO_BCH)
-		rawnand_sw_bch_cleanup(chip);
+	if (chip->ecc.engine_type == NAND_ECC_ENGINE_TYPE_SOFT) {
+		if (chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_ALGO_HAMMING)
+			rawnand_sw_hamming_cleanup(chip);
+		else if (chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_ALGO_BCH)
+			rawnand_sw_bch_cleanup(chip);
+	}
 
 	nanddev_cleanup(&chip->base);