diff options
author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-11-04 16:28:47 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-11-04 16:28:52 +0100 |
commit | 7f16e5c1416070dc590dd333a2d677700046a4ab (patch) | |
tree | 55718bbef64431e70d5ed282be516cd45b3f75e6 /drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c | |
parent | 9d1cb9147dbe45f6e94dc796518ecf67cb64b359 (diff) | |
parent | 5e01dc7b26d9f24f39abace5da98ccbd6a5ceb52 (diff) |
Merge tag 'v3.12' into drm-intel-next
I want to merge in the new Broadwell support as a late hw enabling
pull request. But since the internal branch was based upon our
drm-intel-nightly integration branch I need to resolve all the
oustanding conflicts in drm/i915 with a backmerge to make the 60+
patches apply properly.
We'll propably have some fun because Linus will come up with a
slightly different merge solution.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
All rather simple adjacent lines changed or partial backports from
-next to -fixes, with the exception of the thaw code in i915_dma.c.
That one needed a bit of shuffling to restore the intent.
Oh and the massive header file reordering in intel_drv.h is a bit
trouble. But not much.
v2: Also don't forget the fixup for the silent conflict that results
in compile fail ...
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c | 52 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c index 6cfb88732452..28757dfacf0d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_vfpf.c @@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ static int bnx2x_copy32_vf_dmae(struct bnx2x *bp, u8 from_vf, dmae.len = len32; /* issue the command and wait for completion */ - return bnx2x_issue_dmae_with_comp(bp, &dmae); + return bnx2x_issue_dmae_with_comp(bp, &dmae, bnx2x_sp(bp, wb_comp)); } static void bnx2x_vf_mbx_resp(struct bnx2x *bp, struct bnx2x_virtf *vf) @@ -1765,28 +1765,28 @@ static void bnx2x_vf_mbx_request(struct bnx2x *bp, struct bnx2x_virtf *vf, switch (mbx->first_tlv.tl.type) { case CHANNEL_TLV_ACQUIRE: bnx2x_vf_mbx_acquire(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_INIT: bnx2x_vf_mbx_init_vf(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_SETUP_Q: bnx2x_vf_mbx_setup_q(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_SET_Q_FILTERS: bnx2x_vf_mbx_set_q_filters(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_TEARDOWN_Q: bnx2x_vf_mbx_teardown_q(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_CLOSE: bnx2x_vf_mbx_close_vf(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_RELEASE: bnx2x_vf_mbx_release_vf(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; case CHANNEL_TLV_UPDATE_RSS: bnx2x_vf_mbx_update_rss(bp, vf, mbx); - break; + return; } } else { @@ -1802,26 +1802,24 @@ static void bnx2x_vf_mbx_request(struct bnx2x *bp, struct bnx2x_virtf *vf, for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) DP_CONT(BNX2X_MSG_IOV, "%x ", mbx->msg->req.tlv_buf_size.tlv_buffer[i]); + } - /* test whether we can respond to the VF (do we have an address - * for it?) - */ - if (vf->state == VF_ACQUIRED || vf->state == VF_ENABLED) { - /* mbx_resp uses the op_rc of the VF */ - vf->op_rc = PFVF_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED; + /* can we respond to VF (do we have an address for it?) */ + if (vf->state == VF_ACQUIRED || vf->state == VF_ENABLED) { + /* mbx_resp uses the op_rc of the VF */ + vf->op_rc = PFVF_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED; - /* notify the VF that we do not support this request */ - bnx2x_vf_mbx_resp(bp, vf); - } else { - /* can't send a response since this VF is unknown to us - * just ack the FW to release the mailbox and unlock - * the channel. - */ - storm_memset_vf_mbx_ack(bp, vf->abs_vfid); - mmiowb(); - bnx2x_unlock_vf_pf_channel(bp, vf, - mbx->first_tlv.tl.type); - } + /* notify the VF that we do not support this request */ + bnx2x_vf_mbx_resp(bp, vf); + } else { + /* can't send a response since this VF is unknown to us + * just ack the FW to release the mailbox and unlock + * the channel. + */ + storm_memset_vf_mbx_ack(bp, vf->abs_vfid); + /* Firmware ack should be written before unlocking channel */ + mmiowb(); + bnx2x_unlock_vf_pf_channel(bp, vf, mbx->first_tlv.tl.type); } } |