summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>2018-02-13 15:48:30 +0200
committerSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>2018-12-17 11:03:27 -0800
commitd9ee0491c2ffbb5bc8bc418dd857a045d0d0130f (patch)
tree39b8a469397ddbdf31ed1dbb2434fd766ff407b4 /drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h
parent025380b20dc2a3b92a36394799157a63a2fe5814 (diff)
net/mlx5e: Use dedicated uplink vport netdev representor
Currently, when running in sriov switchdev mode, we are using the PF netdevice as the uplink representor, this is problematic from few aspects: - will break when the PF isn't eswitch manager (e.g smart NIC env) - misalignment with other NIC switchdev drivers - makes us have and maintain special code, hurts the driver quality/robustness - which in turn opens the door for future bugs As of each and all of the above, we move to have a dedicated netdev representor for the uplink vport in a similar manner done for for the VF vports. This includes the following: 1. have an uplink rep netdev as we have for VF reps 2. all reps use same load/unload functions 3. HW stats for uplink based on physical port counters and not vport counters 4. link state for the uplink managed through PAOS and not vport state 5. the uplink rep has sysfs link to the PF PCI function && uses the PF MAC address Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h
index 2c8798332c32..07d5964356f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rep.h
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ struct mlx5e_rep_sq {
};
void *mlx5e_alloc_nic_rep_priv(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev);
-void mlx5e_register_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
-void mlx5e_unregister_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
+void mlx5e_rep_register_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
+void mlx5e_rep_unregister_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
bool mlx5e_is_uplink_rep(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
int mlx5e_add_sqs_fwd_rules(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
void mlx5e_remove_sqs_fwd_rules(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
@@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ void mlx5e_remove_sqs_fwd_rules(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
int mlx5e_get_offload_stats(int attr_id, const struct net_device *dev, void *sp);
bool mlx5e_has_offload_stats(const struct net_device *dev, int attr_id);
-int mlx5e_attr_get(struct net_device *dev, struct switchdev_attr *attr);
void mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_rep(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5_cqe64 *cqe);
int mlx5e_rep_encap_entry_attach(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
@@ -181,11 +180,15 @@ void mlx5e_rep_encap_entry_detach(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
void mlx5e_rep_queue_neigh_stats_work(struct mlx5e_priv *priv);
#else /* CONFIG_MLX5_ESWITCH */
-static inline void mlx5e_register_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) {}
-static inline void mlx5e_unregister_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) {}
+static inline void mlx5e_rep_register_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) {}
+static inline void mlx5e_rep_unregister_vport_reps(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) {}
static inline bool mlx5e_is_uplink_rep(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) { return false; }
static inline int mlx5e_add_sqs_fwd_rules(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) { return 0; }
static inline void mlx5e_remove_sqs_fwd_rules(struct mlx5e_priv *priv) {}
#endif
+static inline bool mlx5e_is_vport_rep(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
+{
+ return (MLX5_ESWITCH_MANAGER(priv->mdev) && priv->ppriv);
+}
#endif /* __MLX5E_REP_H__ */