Merge tag 'v3.12' into drm-intel-next

I want to merge in the new Broadwell support as a late hw enabling
pull request. But since the internal branch was based upon our
drm-intel-nightly integration branch I need to resolve all the
oustanding conflicts in drm/i915 with a backmerge to make the 60+
patches apply properly.

We'll propably have some fun because Linus will come up with a
slightly different merge solution.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h

All rather simple adjacent lines changed or partial backports from
-next to -fixes, with the exception of the thaw code in i915_dma.c.
That one needed a bit of shuffling to restore the intent.

Oh and the massive header file reordering in intel_drv.h is a bit
trouble. But not much.

v2: Also don't forget the fixup for the silent conflict that results
in compile fail ...

Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

5 files changed, 25 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c
index 1a7816390773..b9f2653e4ef9 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static struct da9063_regulators_pdata *da9063_parse_regulators_dt(
 		struct of_regulator_match **da9063_reg_matches)
 {
 	da9063_reg_matches = NULL;
-	return PTR_ERR(-ENODEV);
+	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
index 488dfe7ce9a6..7e2b165972e6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/palmas-regulator.c
@@ -201,13 +201,7 @@ static unsigned int palmas_smps_ramp_delay[4] = {0, 10000, 5000, 2500};
 #define SMPS_CTRL_MODE_ECO		0x02
 #define SMPS_CTRL_MODE_PWM		0x03
 
-/* These values are derived from the data sheet. And are the number of steps
- * where there is a voltage change, the ranges at beginning and end of register
- * max/min values where there are no change are ommitted.
- *
- * So they are basically (maxV-minV)/stepV
- */
-#define PALMAS_SMPS_NUM_VOLTAGES	117
+#define PALMAS_SMPS_NUM_VOLTAGES	122
 #define PALMAS_SMPS10_NUM_VOLTAGES	2
 #define PALMAS_LDO_NUM_VOLTAGES		50
 
@@ -979,6 +973,7 @@ static int palmas_regulators_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			pmic->desc[id].min_uV = 900000;
 			pmic->desc[id].uV_step = 50000;
 			pmic->desc[id].linear_min_sel = 1;
+			pmic->desc[id].enable_time = 500;
 			pmic->desc[id].vsel_reg =
 					PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_LDO_BASE,
 						palmas_regs_info[id].vsel_addr);
@@ -997,6 +992,11 @@ static int palmas_regulators_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				pmic->desc[id].min_uV = 450000;
 				pmic->desc[id].uV_step = 25000;
 			}
+
+			/* LOD6 in vibrator mode will have enable time 2000us */
+			if (pdata && pdata->ldo6_vibrator &&
+				(id == PALMAS_REG_LDO6))
+				pmic->desc[id].enable_time = 2000;
 		} else {
 			pmic->desc[id].n_voltages = 1;
 			pmic->desc[id].ops = &palmas_ops_extreg;
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c
index d8e3e1262bc2..20c271d49dcb 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/ti-abb-regulator.c
@@ -279,8 +279,12 @@ static int ti_abb_set_opp(struct regulator_dev *rdev, struct ti_abb *abb,
 	ti_abb_rmw(regs->opp_sel_mask, info->opp_sel, regs->control_reg,
 		   abb->base);
 
-	/* program LDO VBB vset override if needed */
-	if (abb->ldo_base)
+	/*
+	 * program LDO VBB vset override if needed for !bypass mode
+	 * XXX: Do not switch sequence - for !bypass, LDO override reset *must*
+	 * be performed *before* switch to bias mode else VBB glitches.
+	 */
+	if (abb->ldo_base && info->opp_sel != TI_ABB_NOMINAL_OPP)
 		ti_abb_program_ldovbb(dev, abb, info);
 
 	/* Initiate ABB ldo change */
@@ -295,6 +299,14 @@ static int ti_abb_set_opp(struct regulator_dev *rdev, struct ti_abb *abb,
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
+	/*
+	 * Reset LDO VBB vset override bypass mode
+	 * XXX: Do not switch sequence - for bypass, LDO override reset *must*
+	 * be performed *after* switch to bypass else VBB glitches.
+	 */
+	if (abb->ldo_base && info->opp_sel == TI_ABB_NOMINAL_OPP)
+		ti_abb_program_ldovbb(dev, abb, info);
+
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
index 1432b26ef2e9..2205fbc2c37b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/wm831x-ldo.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static irqreturn_t wm831x_ldo_uv_irq(int irq, void *data)
  */
 
 static const struct regulator_linear_range wm831x_gp_ldo_ranges[] = {
-	{ .min_uV =  900000, .max_uV = 1650000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 14,
+	{ .min_uV =  900000, .max_uV = 1600000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 14,
 	  .uV_step =  50000 },
 	{ .min_uV = 1700000, .max_uV = 3300000, .min_sel = 15, .max_sel = 31,
 	  .uV_step = 100000 },
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static struct platform_driver wm831x_gp_ldo_driver = {
  */
 
 static const struct regulator_linear_range wm831x_aldo_ranges[] = {
-	{ .min_uV = 1000000, .max_uV = 1650000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 12,
+	{ .min_uV = 1000000, .max_uV = 1600000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 12,
 	  .uV_step =  50000 },
 	{ .min_uV = 1700000, .max_uV = 3500000, .min_sel = 13, .max_sel = 31,
 	  .uV_step = 100000 },
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm8350-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/wm8350-regulator.c
index 835b5f0f344e..61ca9292a429 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/wm8350-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/wm8350-regulator.c
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int wm8350_dcdc_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 }
 
 static const struct regulator_linear_range wm8350_ldo_ranges[] = {
-	{ .min_uV =  900000, .max_uV = 1750000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 15,
+	{ .min_uV =  900000, .max_uV = 1650000, .min_sel =  0, .max_sel = 15,
 	  .uV_step =  50000 },
 	{ .min_uV = 1800000, .max_uV = 3300000, .min_sel = 16, .max_sel = 31,
 	  .uV_step = 100000 },