summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>2023-02-03 16:50:26 -0500
committerAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>2023-02-09 11:41:25 -0700
commit2b48f52f2bff8e8926165983f3a3d7b89b33de08 (patch)
treeb4bdc8b34c8b0138d19376e5d96b9920ebe80b5f /drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
parente592296cd6e15ddeebe4c8411365c550da65c8bf (diff)
vfio: fix deadlock between group lock and kvm lock
After 51cdc8bc120e, we have another deadlock scenario between the kvm->lock and the vfio group_lock with two different codepaths acquiring the locks in different order. Specifically in vfio_open_device, vfio holds the vfio group_lock when issuing device->ops->open_device but some drivers (like vfio-ap) need to acquire kvm->lock during their open_device routine; Meanwhile, kvm_vfio_release will acquire the kvm->lock first before calling vfio_file_set_kvm which will acquire the vfio group_lock. To resolve this, let's remove the need for the vfio group_lock from the kvm_vfio_release codepath. This is done by introducing a new spinlock to protect modifications to the vfio group kvm pointer, and acquiring a kvm ref from within vfio while holding this spinlock, with the reference held until the last close for the device in question. Fixes: 51cdc8bc120e ("kvm/vfio: Fix potential deadlock on vfio group_lock") Reported-by: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230203215027.151988-2-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c63
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
index 5177bb061b17..28c47cd6a6b5 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/idr.h>
#include <linux/iommu.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
+#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#endif
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
@@ -338,6 +341,55 @@ void vfio_unregister_group_dev(struct vfio_device *device)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_unregister_group_dev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM
+void _vfio_device_get_kvm_safe(struct vfio_device *device, struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ void (*pfn)(struct kvm *kvm);
+ bool (*fn)(struct kvm *kvm);
+ bool ret;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+ pfn = symbol_get(kvm_put_kvm);
+ if (WARN_ON(!pfn))
+ return;
+
+ fn = symbol_get(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
+ if (WARN_ON(!fn)) {
+ symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ret = fn(kvm);
+ symbol_put(kvm_get_kvm_safe);
+ if (!ret) {
+ symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ device->put_kvm = pfn;
+ device->kvm = kvm;
+}
+
+void vfio_device_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
+ if (!device->kvm)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!device->put_kvm))
+ goto clear;
+
+ device->put_kvm(device->kvm);
+ device->put_kvm = NULL;
+ symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
+
+clear:
+ device->kvm = NULL;
+}
+#endif
+
/* true if the vfio_device has open_device() called but not close_device() */
static bool vfio_assert_device_open(struct vfio_device *device)
{
@@ -361,7 +413,6 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
if (ret)
goto err_module_put;
- device->kvm = kvm;
if (device->ops->open_device) {
ret = device->ops->open_device(device);
if (ret)
@@ -370,7 +421,6 @@ static int vfio_device_first_open(struct vfio_device *device,
return 0;
err_unuse_iommu:
- device->kvm = NULL;
if (iommufd)
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
else
@@ -387,7 +437,6 @@ static void vfio_device_last_close(struct vfio_device *device,
if (device->ops->close_device)
device->ops->close_device(device);
- device->kvm = NULL;
if (iommufd)
vfio_iommufd_unbind(device);
else
@@ -400,14 +449,14 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
{
int ret = 0;
- mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
device->open_count++;
if (device->open_count == 1) {
ret = vfio_device_first_open(device, iommufd, kvm);
if (ret)
device->open_count--;
}
- mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -415,12 +464,12 @@ int vfio_device_open(struct vfio_device *device,
void vfio_device_close(struct vfio_device *device,
struct iommufd_ctx *iommufd)
{
- mutex_lock(&device->dev_set->lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&device->dev_set->lock);
+
vfio_assert_device_open(device);
if (device->open_count == 1)
vfio_device_last_close(device, iommufd);
device->open_count--;
- mutex_unlock(&device->dev_set->lock);
}
/*