summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/locking.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>2020-08-20 11:46:10 -0400
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2020-12-08 15:54:01 +0100
commitac5887c8e013d6754d36e6d51dc03448ee0b0065 (patch)
treefa8e936af2eaf48321a72e6498c02280235b964c /fs/btrfs/locking.c
parent2ae0c2d80d25dae7658b64b93c271004bc8708e8 (diff)
btrfs: locking: remove all the blocking helpers
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are called. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/locking.c74
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 60e0f00b9b8f..5260660b655a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -51,31 +51,6 @@
*/
/*
- * Mark already held read lock as blocking. Can be nested in write lock by the
- * same thread.
- *
- * Use when there are potentially long operations ahead so other thread waiting
- * on the lock will not actively spin but sleep instead.
- *
- * The rwlock is released and blocking reader counter is increased.
- */
-void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(struct extent_buffer *eb)
-{
-}
-
-/*
- * Mark already held write lock as blocking.
- *
- * Use when there are potentially long operations ahead so other threads
- * waiting on the lock will not actively spin but sleep instead.
- *
- * The rwlock is released and blocking writers is set.
- */
-void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(struct extent_buffer *eb)
-{
-}
-
-/*
* __btrfs_tree_read_lock - lock extent buffer for read
* @eb: the eb to be locked
* @nest: the nesting level to be used for lockdep
@@ -131,17 +106,6 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
}
/*
- * Lock extent buffer for read, optimistically expecting that there are no
- * contending blocking writers. If there are, don't wait.
- *
- * Return 1 if the rwlock has been taken, 0 otherwise
- */
-int btrfs_tree_read_lock_atomic(struct extent_buffer *eb)
-{
- return btrfs_try_tree_read_lock(eb);
-}
-
-/*
* Try-lock for read.
*
* Retrun 1 if the rwlock has been taken, 0 otherwise
@@ -193,18 +157,6 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
}
/*
- * Release read lock, previously set to blocking by a pairing call to
- * btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(). Can be nested in write lock by the same
- * thread.
- *
- * State of rwlock is unchanged, last reader wakes waiting threads.
- */
-void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
-{
- btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
-}
-
-/*
* __btrfs_tree_lock - lock eb for write
* @eb: the eb to lock
* @nest: the nesting to use for the lock
@@ -240,32 +192,6 @@ void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
}
/*
- * Set all locked nodes in the path to blocking locks. This should be done
- * before scheduling
- */
-void btrfs_set_path_blocking(struct btrfs_path *p)
-{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL; i++) {
- if (!p->nodes[i] || !p->locks[i])
- continue;
- /*
- * If we currently have a spinning reader or writer lock this
- * will bump the count of blocking holders and drop the
- * spinlock.
- */
- if (p->locks[i] == BTRFS_READ_LOCK) {
- btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(p->nodes[i]);
- p->locks[i] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING;
- } else if (p->locks[i] == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK) {
- btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(p->nodes[i]);
- p->locks[i] = BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK_BLOCKING;
- }
- }
-}
-
-/*
* This releases any locks held in the path starting at level and going all the
* way up to the root.
*