summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>2021-07-26 14:35:06 +0800
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2021-08-23 13:19:06 +0200
commit95ea0486b20e4de9011d04b05ed667201940b532 (patch)
tree141df9dbb4fd95a839b4122e0b3043851f944c86 /fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
parent9d9ea1e68a05ef852d612f0c49d274c86e1e710a (diff)
btrfs: allow read-write for 4K sectorsize on 64K page size systems
Since now we support data and metadata read-write for subpage, remove the RO requirement for subpage mount. There are some extra limitations though: - For now, subpage RW mount is still considered experimental Thus that mount warning will still be there. - No compression support There are still quite some PAGE_SIZE hard coded and quite some call sites use extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() to unlock locked_page. This will screw up subpage helpers. Now for subpage RW mount, no matter what mount option or inode attr is set, all writes will not be compressed. Although reading compressed data has no problem. - No defrag for subpage case The defrag support for subpage case will come in later patches, which will also rework the defrag workflow. - No inline extent will be created This is mostly due to the fact that filemap_fdatawrite_range() will trigger more write than the range specified. In fallocate calls, this behavior can make us to writeback which can be inlined, before we enlarge the i_size. This is a very special corner case, and even current btrfs check won't report error on such inline extent + regular extent. But considering how much effort has been put to prevent such inline + regular, I'd prefer to cut off inline extent completely until we have a good solution. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/sysfs.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/sysfs.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
index 9d1d140118ff..d9d53a255ef9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
@@ -366,6 +366,10 @@ static ssize_t supported_sectorsizes_show(struct kobject *kobj,
{
ssize_t ret = 0;
+ /* 4K sector size is also supported with 64K page size */
+ if (PAGE_SIZE == SZ_64K)
+ ret += scnprintf(buf + ret, PAGE_SIZE - ret, "%u ", SZ_4K);
+
/* Only sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE is now supported */
ret += scnprintf(buf + ret, PAGE_SIZE - ret, "%lu\n", PAGE_SIZE);