diff options
| author | Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> | 2023-12-04 16:20:25 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2023-12-15 22:59:01 +0100 |
| commit | eca3aaec0de1e7059340f906a0741a68c1cf9e2b (patch) | |
| tree | 5edf754ac11fdacfe990bce6d157e400a981ef3e /fs/btrfs/tests | |
| parent | b30aa1c176ba86a035d40c2d2f12dc0e0f687e0e (diff) | |
btrfs: tests: do not ignore NULL extent maps for extent maps tests
Several of the extent map tests call btrfs_add_extent_mapping() which is
supposed to succeed and return an extent map through the pointer to
pointer argument. However the tests are deliberately ignoring a NULL
extent map, which is not expected to happen. So change the tests to error
out if a NULL extent map is found.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c index ac64eafad703..024588d02551 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c @@ -121,9 +121,14 @@ static int test_case_1(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, test_err("case1 [%llu %llu]: ret %d", start, start + len, ret); goto out; } - if (em && - (em->start != 0 || extent_map_end(em) != SZ_16K || - em->block_start != 0 || em->block_len != SZ_16K)) { + if (!em) { + test_err("case1 [%llu %llu]: no extent map returned", + start, start + len); + ret = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } + if (em->start != 0 || extent_map_end(em) != SZ_16K || + em->block_start != 0 || em->block_len != SZ_16K) { test_err( "case1 [%llu %llu]: ret %d return a wrong em (start %llu len %llu block_start %llu block_len %llu", start, start + len, ret, em->start, em->len, @@ -209,9 +214,13 @@ static int test_case_2(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, test_err("case2 [0 1K]: ret %d", ret); goto out; } - if (em && - (em->start != 0 || extent_map_end(em) != SZ_1K || - em->block_start != EXTENT_MAP_INLINE || em->block_len != (u64)-1)) { + if (!em) { + test_err("case2 [0 1K]: no extent map returned"); + ret = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } + if (em->start != 0 || extent_map_end(em) != SZ_1K || + em->block_start != EXTENT_MAP_INLINE || em->block_len != (u64)-1) { test_err( "case2 [0 1K]: ret %d return a wrong em (start %llu len %llu block_start %llu block_len %llu", ret, em->start, em->len, em->block_start, @@ -272,13 +281,18 @@ static int __test_case_3(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, start, start + len, ret); goto out; } + if (!em) { + test_err("case3 [0x%llx 0x%llx): no extent map returned", + start, start + len); + ret = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } /* * Since bytes within em are contiguous, em->block_start is identical to * em->start. */ - if (em && - (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em) || - em->start != em->block_start || em->len != em->block_len)) { + if (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em) || + em->start != em->block_start || em->len != em->block_len) { test_err( "case3 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d em (start 0x%llx len 0x%llx block_start 0x%llx block_len 0x%llx)", start, start + len, ret, em->start, em->len, @@ -391,7 +405,13 @@ static int __test_case_4(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, start, start + len, ret); goto out; } - if (em && (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em))) { + if (!em) { + test_err("case4 [0x%llx 0x%llx): no extent map returned", + start, start + len); + ret = -ENOENT; + goto out; + } + if (start < em->start || start + len > extent_map_end(em)) { test_err( "case4 [0x%llx 0x%llx): ret %d, added wrong em (start 0x%llx len 0x%llx block_start 0x%llx block_len 0x%llx)", start, start + len, ret, em->start, em->len, em->block_start, |