xfs: initialise attr fork on inode create

When we allocate a new inode, we often need to add an attribute to
the inode as part of the create. This can happen as a result of
needing to add default ACLs or security labels before the inode is
made visible to userspace.

This is highly inefficient right now. We do the create transaction
to allocate the inode, then we do an "add attr fork" transaction to
modify the just created empty inode to set the inode fork offset to
allow attributes to be stored, then we go and do the attribute
creation.

This means 3 transactions instead of 1 to allocate an inode, and
this greatly increases the load on the CIL commit code, resulting in
excessive contention on the CIL spin locks and performance
degradation:

 18.99%  [kernel]                [k] __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
  3.57%  [kernel]                [k] do_raw_spin_lock
  2.51%  [kernel]                [k] __raw_callee_save___pv_queued_spin_unlock
  2.48%  [kernel]                [k] memcpy
  2.34%  [kernel]                [k] xfs_log_commit_cil

The typical profile resulting from running fsmark on a selinux enabled
filesytem is adds this overhead to the create path:

  - 15.30% xfs_init_security
     - 15.23% security_inode_init_security
	- 13.05% xfs_initxattrs
	   - 12.94% xfs_attr_set
	      - 6.75% xfs_bmap_add_attrfork
		 - 5.51% xfs_trans_commit
		    - 5.48% __xfs_trans_commit
		       - 5.35% xfs_log_commit_cil
			  - 3.86% _raw_spin_lock
			     - do_raw_spin_lock
				  __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
		 - 0.70% xfs_trans_alloc
		      0.52% xfs_trans_reserve
	      - 5.41% xfs_attr_set_args
		 - 5.39% xfs_attr_set_shortform.constprop.0
		    - 4.46% xfs_trans_commit
		       - 4.46% __xfs_trans_commit
			  - 4.33% xfs_log_commit_cil
			     - 2.74% _raw_spin_lock
				- do_raw_spin_lock
				     __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
			       0.60% xfs_inode_item_format
		      0.90% xfs_attr_try_sf_addname
	- 1.99% selinux_inode_init_security
	   - 1.02% security_sid_to_context_force
	      - 1.00% security_sid_to_context_core
		 - 0.92% sidtab_entry_to_string
		    - 0.90% sidtab_sid2str_get
			 0.59% sidtab_sid2str_put.part.0
	   - 0.82% selinux_determine_inode_label
	      - 0.77% security_transition_sid
		   0.70% security_compute_sid.part.0

And fsmark creation rate performance drops by ~25%. The key point to
note here is that half the additional overhead comes from adding the
attribute fork to the newly created inode. That's crazy, considering
we can do this same thing at inode create time with a couple of
lines of code and no extra overhead.

So, if we know we are going to add an attribute immediately after
creating the inode, let's just initialise the attribute fork inside
the create transaction and chop that whole chunk of code out of
the create fast path. This completely removes the performance
drop caused by enabling SELinux, and the profile looks like:

     - 8.99% xfs_init_security
         - 9.00% security_inode_init_security
            - 6.43% xfs_initxattrs
               - 6.37% xfs_attr_set
                  - 5.45% xfs_attr_set_args
                     - 5.42% xfs_attr_set_shortform.constprop.0
                        - 4.51% xfs_trans_commit
                           - 4.54% __xfs_trans_commit
                              - 4.59% xfs_log_commit_cil
                                 - 2.67% _raw_spin_lock
                                    - 3.28% do_raw_spin_lock
                                         3.08% __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
                                   0.66% xfs_inode_item_format
                        - 0.90% xfs_attr_try_sf_addname
                  - 0.60% xfs_trans_alloc
            - 2.35% selinux_inode_init_security
               - 1.25% security_sid_to_context_force
                  - 1.21% security_sid_to_context_core
                     - 1.19% sidtab_entry_to_string
                        - 1.20% sidtab_sid2str_get
                           - 0.86% sidtab_sid2str_put.part.0
                              - 0.62% _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
                                 - 0.77% do_raw_spin_lock
                                      __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
               - 0.84% selinux_determine_inode_label
                  - 0.83% security_transition_sid
                       0.86% security_compute_sid.part.0

Which indicates the XFS overhead of creating the selinux xattr has
been halved. This doesn't fix the CIL lock contention problem, just
means it's not a limiting factor for this workload. Lock contention
in the security subsystems is going to be an issue soon, though...

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
[djwong: fix compilation error when CONFIG_SECURITY=n]
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 33 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
index 66ebccb5a6ff..5b8ac9b6cef8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
@@ -126,6 +126,37 @@ xfs_cleanup_inode(
 	xfs_remove(XFS_I(dir), &teardown, XFS_I(inode));
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check to see if we are likely to need an extended attribute to be added to
+ * the inode we are about to allocate. This allows the attribute fork to be
+ * created during the inode allocation, reducing the number of transactions we
+ * need to do in this fast path.
+ *
+ * The security checks are optimistic, but not guaranteed. The two LSMs that
+ * require xattrs to be added here (selinux and smack) are also the only two
+ * LSMs that add a sb->s_security structure to the superblock. Hence if security
+ * is enabled and sb->s_security is set, we have a pretty good idea that we are
+ * going to be asked to add a security xattr immediately after allocating the
+ * xfs inode and instantiating the VFS inode.
+ */
+static inline bool
+xfs_create_need_xattr(
+	struct inode	*dir,
+	struct posix_acl *default_acl,
+	struct posix_acl *acl)
+{
+	if (acl)
+		return true;
+	if (default_acl)
+		return true;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY)
+	if (dir->i_sb->s_security)
+		return true;
+#endif
+	return false;
+}
+
+
 STATIC int
 xfs_generic_create(
 	struct user_namespace	*mnt_userns,
@@ -163,7 +194,8 @@ xfs_generic_create(
 
 	if (!tmpfile) {
 		error = xfs_create(mnt_userns, XFS_I(dir), &name, mode, rdev,
-				   &ip);
+				xfs_create_need_xattr(dir, default_acl, acl),
+				&ip);
 	} else {
 		error = xfs_create_tmpfile(mnt_userns, XFS_I(dir), mode, &ip);
 	}