summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Ren <zren@suse.com>2016-08-25 17:20:59 +0800
committerDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>2016-08-26 13:22:14 -0500
commit079d37df3397d48aab0f014986c1b0a1ca6256aa (patch)
treeee64358c7af2b4a5ffab8206ad41760ca5e829dc /fs
parentfa8410b355251fd30341662a40ac6b22d3e38468 (diff)
dlm: fix malfunction of dlm_tool caused by debugfs changes
With the current kernel, `dlm_tool lockdebug` fails as below: "dlm_tool lockdebug ED0BD86DCE724393918A1AE8FDBF1EE3 can't open /sys/kernel/debug/dlm/ED0BD86DCE724393918A1AE8FDBF1EE3: Operation not permitted" This is because table_open() depends on file->f_op to tell which seq_file ops should be passed down. But, the original file ops in file->f_op is replaced by "debugfs_full_proxy_file_operations" with commit 49d200deaa68 ("debugfs: prevent access to removed files' private data"). Currently, I can think up 2 solutions: 1st, replace debugfs_create_file() with debugfs_create_file_unsafe(); 2nd, make different table_open#() accordingly. The 1st one is neat, but I don't thoroughly understand its risk. Maybe someone has a better one. Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/dlm/debug_fs.c62
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
index eea64912c9c0..466f7d60edc2 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/debug_fs.c
@@ -607,20 +607,54 @@ static const struct file_operations format2_fops;
static const struct file_operations format3_fops;
static const struct file_operations format4_fops;
-static int table_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static int table_open1(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct seq_file *seq;
- int ret = -1;
+ int ret;
- if (file->f_op == &format1_fops)
- ret = seq_open(file, &format1_seq_ops);
- else if (file->f_op == &format2_fops)
- ret = seq_open(file, &format2_seq_ops);
- else if (file->f_op == &format3_fops)
- ret = seq_open(file, &format3_seq_ops);
- else if (file->f_op == &format4_fops)
- ret = seq_open(file, &format4_seq_ops);
+ ret = seq_open(file, &format1_seq_ops);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ seq = file->private_data;
+ seq->private = inode->i_private; /* the dlm_ls */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int table_open2(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ struct seq_file *seq;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = seq_open(file, &format2_seq_ops);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ seq = file->private_data;
+ seq->private = inode->i_private; /* the dlm_ls */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int table_open3(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ struct seq_file *seq;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = seq_open(file, &format3_seq_ops);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ seq = file->private_data;
+ seq->private = inode->i_private; /* the dlm_ls */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int table_open4(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+ struct seq_file *seq;
+ int ret;
+ ret = seq_open(file, &format4_seq_ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -631,7 +665,7 @@ static int table_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
static const struct file_operations format1_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .open = table_open,
+ .open = table_open1,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release
@@ -639,7 +673,7 @@ static const struct file_operations format1_fops = {
static const struct file_operations format2_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .open = table_open,
+ .open = table_open2,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release
@@ -647,7 +681,7 @@ static const struct file_operations format2_fops = {
static const struct file_operations format3_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .open = table_open,
+ .open = table_open3,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release
@@ -655,7 +689,7 @@ static const struct file_operations format3_fops = {
static const struct file_operations format4_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
- .open = table_open,
+ .open = table_open4,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = seq_release