summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/bpf.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLeon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com>2023-09-12 23:04:41 +0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-09-12 13:06:12 -0700
commit2b5dcb31a19a2e0acd869b12c9db9b2d696ef544 (patch)
tree91bee845d152970dd2b0a523e87dc2fa60712434 /include/linux/bpf.h
parent2bee9770f3c6be736a28725cb0f93775ed22e720 (diff)
bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop
From commit ebf7d1f508a73871 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT"), the tailcall on x64 works better than before. From commit e411901c0b775a3a ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT"), tailcall is able to run in BPF subprograms on x64. From commit 5b92a28aae4dd0f8 ("bpf: Support attaching tracing BPF program to other BPF programs"), BPF program is able to trace other BPF programs. How about combining them all together? 1. FENTRY/FEXIT on a BPF subprogram. 2. A tailcall runs in the BPF subprogram. 3. The tailcall calls the subprogram's caller. As a result, a tailcall infinite loop comes up. And the loop would halt the machine. As we know, in tail call context, the tail_call_cnt propagates by stack and rax register between BPF subprograms. So do in trampolines. Fixes: ebf7d1f508a7 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT") Fixes: e411901c0b77 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912150442.2009-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/bpf.h')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/bpf.h5
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 87eeb3a46a1d..b9e573159432 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1035,6 +1035,11 @@ struct btf_func_model {
*/
#define BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY BIT(6)
+/* Indicate that current trampoline is in a tail call context. Then, it has to
+ * cache and restore tail_call_cnt to avoid infinite tail call loop.
+ */
+#define BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX BIT(7)
+
/* Each call __bpf_prog_enter + call bpf_func + call __bpf_prog_exit is ~50
* bytes on x86.
*/