summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/bpf.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-12-19 17:18:56 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-12-19 17:18:56 -0800
commitc337f237291b41b308c80124236876cf66c77906 (patch)
tree0d1fa15dd3ee74bc0af37143406f7d19e8a3dddc /include/linux/bpf.h
parent1728df7fc11bf09322852ff05e73908244011594 (diff)
parent463ea64eb008b7abb63245ed69446b404bf042b1 (diff)
Merge branch 'bpf-support-to-track-bpf_jne'
Menglong Dong says: ==================== bpf: support to track BPF_JNE For now, the reg bounds is not handled for BPF_JNE case, which can cause the failure of following case: /* The type of "a" is u32 */ if (a > 0 && a < 100) { /* the range of the register for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99], * and will cause the following error: * * invalid zero-sized read * * as a can be 0. */ bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, xx, xx, a, 0); } In the code above, "a > 0" will be compiled to "if a == 0 goto xxx". In the TRUE branch, the dst_reg will be marked as known to 0. However, in the fallthrough(FALSE) branch, the dst_reg will not be handled, which makes the [min, max] for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99]. In the 1st patch, we reduce the range of the dst reg if the src reg is a const and is exactly the edge of the dst reg For BPF_JNE. In the 2nd patch, we remove reduplicated s32 casting in "crafted_cases". In the 3rd patch, we just activate the test case for this logic in range_cond(), which is committed by Andrii in the commit 8863238993e2 ("selftests/bpf: BPF register range bounds tester"). In the 4th patch, we convert the case above to a testcase and add it to verifier_bounds.c. Changes since v4: - add the 2nd patch - add "{U32, U32, {0, U32_MAX}, {U32_MAX, U32_MAX}}" that we missed in the 3rd patch - add some comments to the function that we add in the 4th patch - add reg_not_equal_const() in the 4th patch Changes since v3: - do some adjustment to the crafted cases that we added in the 2nd patch - add the 3rd patch Changes since v2: - fix a typo in the subject of the 1st patch - add some comments to the 1st patch, as Eduard advised - add some cases to the "crafted_cases" Changes since v1: - simplify the code in the 1st patch - introduce the 2nd patch for the testing ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219134800.1550388-1-menglong8.dong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/bpf.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions