summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/energy_model.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>2024-02-08 11:55:38 +0000
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2024-02-08 15:00:24 +0100
commita3c78778f50c4db6cc0bb6aa2986c0174b1267d0 (patch)
tree33d15984cba53d90102dcd497590948e0d3b67d6 /include/linux/energy_model.h
parent99907d6054f2d39a625004f9f4e3fe9297838a3c (diff)
PM: EM: Refactor em_pd_get_efficient_state() to be more flexible
The Energy Model (EM) is going to support runtime modification. There are going to be 2 EM tables which store information. This patch aims to prepare the code to be generic and use one of the tables. The function will no longer get a pointer to 'struct em_perf_domain' (the EM) but instead a pointer to 'struct em_perf_state' (which is one of the EM's tables). Prepare em_pd_get_efficient_state() for the upcoming changes and make it possible to be re-used. Return an index for the best performance state for a given EM table. The function arguments that are introduced should allow to work on different performance state arrays. The caller of em_pd_get_efficient_state() should be able to use the index either on the default or the modifiable EM table. Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia2@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/energy_model.h')
-rw-r--r--include/linux/energy_model.h30
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
index 88d91e087471..1dcd1645dde7 100644
--- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
+++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
@@ -175,33 +175,35 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev);
/**
* em_pd_get_efficient_state() - Get an efficient performance state from the EM
- * @pd : Performance domain for which we want an efficient frequency
- * @freq : Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @table: List of performance states, in ascending order
+ * @nr_perf_states: Number of performance states
+ * @freq: Frequency to map with the EM
+ * @pd_flags: Performance Domain flags
*
* It is called from the scheduler code quite frequently and as a consequence
* doesn't implement any check.
*
- * Return: An efficient performance state, high enough to meet @freq
+ * Return: An efficient performance state id, high enough to meet @freq
* requirement.
*/
-static inline
-struct em_perf_state *em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
- unsigned long freq)
+static inline int
+em_pd_get_efficient_state(struct em_perf_state *table, int nr_perf_states,
+ unsigned long freq, unsigned long pd_flags)
{
struct em_perf_state *ps;
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
- ps = &pd->table[i];
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_perf_states; i++) {
+ ps = &table[i];
if (ps->frequency >= freq) {
- if (pd->flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
+ if (pd_flags & EM_PERF_DOMAIN_SKIP_INEFFICIENCIES &&
ps->flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT)
continue;
- break;
+ return i;
}
}
- return ps;
+ return nr_perf_states - 1;
}
/**
@@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
{
unsigned long freq, ref_freq, scale_cpu;
struct em_perf_state *ps;
- int cpu;
+ int cpu, i;
if (!sum_util)
return 0;
@@ -250,7 +252,9 @@ static inline unsigned long em_cpu_energy(struct em_perf_domain *pd,
* Find the lowest performance state of the Energy Model above the
* requested frequency.
*/
- ps = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd, freq);
+ i = em_pd_get_efficient_state(pd->table, pd->nr_perf_states, freq,
+ pd->flags);
+ ps = &pd->table[i];
/*
* The capacity of a CPU in the domain at the performance state (ps)