seqlock/latch: Provide raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry()

The read side of seqcount_latch consists of:

  do {
    seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&latch->seq);
    ...
  } while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&latch->seq, seq));

which is asymmetric in the raw_ department, and sure enough,
read_seqcount_latch_retry() includes (explicit) instrumentation where
raw_read_seqcount_latch() does not.

This inconsistency becomes a problem when trying to use it from
noinstr code. As such, fix it by renaming and re-implementing
raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry() without the instrumentation.

Specifically the instrumentation in question is kcsan_atomic_next(0)
in do___read_seqcount_retry(). Loosing this annotation is not a
problem because raw_read_seqcount_latch() does not pass through
kcsan_atomic_next(KCSAN_SEQLOCK_REGION_MAX).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>  # Hyper-V
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230519102715.233598176@infradead.org

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h b/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
index 3d1a9e716b80..6a0999c26c7c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
+++ b/include/linux/rbtree_latch.h
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ latch_tree_find(void *key, struct latch_tree_root *root,
 	do {
 		seq = raw_read_seqcount_latch(&root->seq);
 		node = __lt_find(key, root, seq & 1, ops->comp);
-	} while (read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
+	} while (raw_read_seqcount_latch_retry(&root->seq, seq));
 
 	return node;
 }