summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/uapi/rdma
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com>2013-11-06 23:21:49 +0100
committerRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>2013-11-17 08:22:09 -0800
commitf21519b23c1b6fa25366be4114ccf7fcf1c190f9 (patch)
tree66a93d5621a3d992f7f4b5410846bfc89e0b6157 /include/uapi/rdma
parent2490f20be496c2da14ae4632a8c60e0633e97fd0 (diff)
IB/core: extended command: an improved infrastructure for uverbs commands
Commit 400dbc96583f ("IB/core: Infrastructure for extensible uverbs commands") added an infrastructure for extensible uverbs commands while later commit 436f2ad05a0b ("IB/core: Export ib_create/destroy_flow through uverbs") exported ib_create_flow()/ib_destroy_flow() functions using this new infrastructure. According to the commit 400dbc96583f, the purpose of this infrastructure is to support passing around provider (eg. hardware) specific buffers when userspace issue commands to the kernel, so that it would be possible to extend uverbs (eg. core) buffers independently from the provider buffers. But the new kernel command function prototypes were not modified to take advantage of this extension. This issue was exposed by Roland Dreier in a previous review[1]. So the following patch is an attempt to a revised extensible command infrastructure. This improved extensible command infrastructure distinguish between core (eg. legacy)'s command/response buffers from provider (eg. hardware)'s command/response buffers: each extended command implementing function is given a struct ib_udata to hold core (eg. uverbs) input and output buffers, and another struct ib_udata to hold the hw (eg. provider) input and output buffers. Having those buffers identified separately make it easier to increase one buffer to support extension without having to add some code to guess the exact size of each command/response parts: This should make the extended functions more reliable. Additionally, instead of relying on command identifier being greater than IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD, the proposed infrastructure rely on unused bits in command field: on the 32 bits provided by command field, only 6 bits are really needed to encode the identifier of commands currently supported by the kernel. (Even using only 6 bits leaves room for about 23 new commands). So this patch makes use of some high order bits in command field to store flags, leaving enough room for more command identifiers than one will ever need (eg. 256). The new flags are used to specify if the command should be processed as an extended one or a legacy one. While designing the new command format, care was taken to make usage of flags itself extensible. Using high order bits of the commands field ensure that newer libibverbs on older kernel will properly fail when trying to call extended commands. On the other hand, older libibverbs on newer kernel will never be able to issue calls to extended commands. The extended command header includes the optional response pointer so that output buffer length and output buffer pointer are located together in the command, allowing proper parameters checking. This should make implementing functions easier and safer. Additionally the extended header ensure 64bits alignment, while making all sizes multiple of 8 bytes, extending the maximum buffer size: legacy extended Maximum command buffer: 256KBytes 1024KBytes (512KBytes + 512KBytes) Maximum response buffer: 256KBytes 1024KBytes (512KBytes + 512KBytes) For the purpose of doing proper buffer size accounting, the headers size are no more taken in account in "in_words". One of the odds of the current extensible infrastructure, reading twice the "legacy" command header, is fixed by removing the "legacy" command header from the extended command header: they are processed as two different parts of the command: memory is read once and information are not duplicated: it's making clear that's an extended command scheme and not a different command scheme. The proposed scheme will format input (command) and output (response) buffers this way: - command: legacy header + extended header + command data (core + hw): +----------------------------------------+ | flags | 00 00 | command | | in_words | out_words | +----------------------------------------+ | response | | response | | provider_in_words | provider_out_words | | padding | +----------------------------------------+ | | . <uverbs input> . . (in_words * 8) . | | +----------------------------------------+ | | . <provider input> . . (provider_in_words * 8) . | | +----------------------------------------+ - response, if present: +----------------------------------------+ | | . <uverbs output space> . . (out_words * 8) . | | +----------------------------------------+ | | . <provider output space> . . (provider_out_words * 8) . | | +----------------------------------------+ The overall design is to ensure that the extensible infrastructure is itself extensible while begin more reliable with more input and bound checking. Note: The unused field in the extended header would be perfect candidate to hold the command "comp_mask" (eg. bit field used to handle compatibility). This was suggested by Roland Dreier in a previous review[2]. But "comp_mask" field is likely to be present in the uverb input and/or provider input, likewise for the response, as noted by Matan Barak[3], so it doesn't make sense to put "comp_mask" in the header. [1]: http://marc.info/?i=CAL1RGDWxmM17W2o_era24A-TTDeKyoL6u3NRu_=t_dhV_ZA9MA@mail.gmail.com [2]: http://marc.info/?i=CAL1RGDXJtrc849M6_XNZT5xO1+ybKtLWGq6yg6LhoSsKpsmkYA@mail.gmail.com [3]: http://marc.info/?i=525C1149.6000701@mellanox.com Signed-off-by: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@opteya.com> Link: http://marc.info/?i=cover.1383773832.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com [ Convert "ret ? ret : 0" to the equivalent "ret". - Roland ] Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/uapi/rdma')
-rw-r--r--include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h23
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h b/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h
index fc9bbe37cfce..6ace125e1af6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/rdma/ib_user_verbs.h
@@ -87,11 +87,14 @@ enum {
IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CLOSE_XRCD,
IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_XSRQ,
IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_OPEN_QP,
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_EXPERIMENTAL_UVERBS_FLOW_STEERING
- IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_CREATE_FLOW = IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD,
- IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_DESTROY_FLOW
-#endif /* CONFIG_INFINIBAND_EXPERIMENTAL_UVERBS_FLOW_STEERING */
+enum {
+ IB_USER_VERBS_EX_CMD_CREATE_FLOW = IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_THRESHOLD,
+ IB_USER_VERBS_EX_CMD_DESTROY_FLOW
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_INFINIBAND_EXPERIMENTAL_UVERBS_FLOW_STEERING */
/*
* Make sure that all structs defined in this file remain laid out so
@@ -122,6 +125,12 @@ struct ib_uverbs_comp_event_desc {
* the rest of the command struct based on these value.
*/
+#define IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_COMMAND_MASK 0xff
+#define IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_FLAGS_MASK 0xff000000u
+#define IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_FLAGS_SHIFT 24
+
+#define IB_USER_VERBS_CMD_FLAG_EXTENDED 0x80
+
struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr {
__u32 command;
__u16 in_words;
@@ -129,10 +138,8 @@ struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_INFINIBAND_EXPERIMENTAL_UVERBS_FLOW_STEERING
-struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr_ex {
- __u32 command;
- __u16 in_words;
- __u16 out_words;
+struct ib_uverbs_ex_cmd_hdr {
+ __u64 response;
__u16 provider_in_words;
__u16 provider_out_words;
__u32 cmd_hdr_reserved;
@@ -782,8 +789,6 @@ struct ib_uverbs_flow_attr {
struct ib_uverbs_create_flow {
__u32 comp_mask;
- __u32 reserved;
- __u64 response;
__u32 qp_handle;
struct ib_uverbs_flow_attr flow_attr;
};