summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/io_uring
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>2023-07-07 09:20:07 -0700
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2023-07-07 11:24:29 -0600
commit8a796565cec3601071cbbd27d6304e202019d014 (patch)
treeb8f670a0711a9a2eb726a7d55239677f7db66112 /io_uring
parentdfbe5561ae9339516a3742a3fbd678609ad59fd0 (diff)
io_uring: Use io_schedule* in cqring wait
I observed poor performance of io_uring compared to synchronous IO. That turns out to be caused by deeper CPU idle states entered with io_uring, due to io_uring using plain schedule(), whereas synchronous IO uses io_schedule(). The losses due to this are substantial. On my cascade lake workstation, t/io_uring from the fio repository e.g. yields regressions between 20% and 40% with the following command: ./t/io_uring -r 5 -X0 -d 1 -s 1 -c 1 -p 0 -S$use_sync -R 0 /mnt/t2/fio/write.0.0 This is repeatable with different filesystems, using raw block devices and using different block devices. Use io_schedule_prepare() / io_schedule_finish() in io_cqring_wait_schedule() to address the difference. After that using io_uring is on par or surpassing synchronous IO (using registered files etc makes it reliably win, but arguably is a less fair comparison). There are other calls to schedule() in io_uring/, but none immediately jump out to be similarly situated, so I did not touch them. Similarly, it's possible that mutex_lock_io() should be used, but it's not clear if there are cases where that matters. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707162007.194068-1-andres@anarazel.de [axboe: minor style fixup] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'io_uring')
-rw-r--r--io_uring/io_uring.c15
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index e8096d502a7c..7505de2428e0 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2489,6 +2489,8 @@ int io_run_task_work_sig(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_wait_queue *iowq)
{
+ int token, ret;
+
if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(ctx->check_cq)))
return 1;
if (unlikely(!llist_empty(&ctx->work_llist)))
@@ -2499,11 +2501,20 @@ static inline int io_cqring_wait_schedule(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
return -EINTR;
if (unlikely(io_should_wake(iowq)))
return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Use io_schedule_prepare/finish, so cpufreq can take into account
+ * that the task is waiting for IO - turns out to be important for low
+ * QD IO.
+ */
+ token = io_schedule_prepare();
+ ret = 0;
if (iowq->timeout == KTIME_MAX)
schedule();
else if (!schedule_hrtimeout(&iowq->timeout, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS))
- return -ETIME;
- return 0;
+ ret = -ETIME;
+ io_schedule_finish(token);
+ return ret;
}
/*