diff options
| author | Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> | 2022-07-11 11:08:20 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2022-07-11 21:04:58 +0200 |
| commit | 535a57a7ffc04932ad83c1a5649b09ba6c93ce83 (patch) | |
| tree | ffc9d4fc14e5a6b489fc1cfa6f5de8001368f164 /kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | |
| parent | 9974d37ea75f01b47d16072b5dad305bd8d23fcc (diff) | |
bpf: Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags()
Before generating bpf trampoline, x86 calls is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags()
to check the input flags. This check is architecture independent.
So, to be consistent with x86, arm64 should also do this check
before generating bpf trampoline.
However, the BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags are not used by user code and the
flags argument is almost constant at compile time, so this run time
check is a bit redundant.
Remove is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() and add some comments to the usage of
BPF_TRAMP_F_XXX flags, as suggested by Alexei.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220711150823.2128542-2-xukuohai@huawei.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c index 7e0068c3399c..84b2d9dba79a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c @@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].links[0] = link; tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_links = 1; + /* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops, + * and it must be used alone. + */ flags = model->ret_size > 0 ? BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET : 0; return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image, image_end, model, flags, tlinks, NULL); |