diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-08-15 00:05:54 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-08-17 00:45:07 +0200 |
| commit | fb7dd8bca0139fd73d3f4a6cd257b11731317ded (patch) | |
| tree | 9006ce2d61e9cd8c9fa353e5cff61d5f6da09031 /kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | |
| parent | 1bda52f80471260bcc7391f4e6919effedfc88d8 (diff) | |
bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN into a function
Turn BPF_PROG_RUN into a proper always inlined function. No functional and
performance changes are intended, but it makes it much easier to understand
what's going on with how BPF programs are actually get executed. It's more
obvious what types and callbacks are expected. Also extra () around input
parameters can be dropped, as well as `__` variable prefixes intended to avoid
naming collisions, which makes the code simpler to read and write.
This refactoring also highlighted one extra issue. BPF_PROG_RUN is both
a macro and an enum value (BPF_PROG_RUN == BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Turning
BPF_PROG_RUN into a function causes naming conflict compilation error. So
rename BPF_PROG_RUN into lower-case bpf_prog_run(), similar to
bpf_prog_run_xdp(), bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(), etc. All existing callers of
BPF_PROG_RUN, the macro, are switched to bpf_prog_run() explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-2-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/cgroup.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/cgroup.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c index 9f6070369caa..16dc467adfa0 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk(struct sock *sk, struct cgroup *cgrp = sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data); int ret; - ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], sk, BPF_PROG_RUN); + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], sk, bpf_prog_run); return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EPERM; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sk); @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr(struct sock *sk, cgrp = sock_cgroup_ptr(&sk->sk_cgrp_data); ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_FLAGS(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx, - BPF_PROG_RUN, flags); + bpf_prog_run, flags); return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EPERM; } @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops(struct sock *sk, int ret; ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], sock_ops, - BPF_PROG_RUN); + bpf_prog_run); return ret == 1 ? 0 : -EPERM; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops); @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_check_dev_permission(short dev_type, u32 major, u32 minor, rcu_read_lock(); cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current); allow = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx, - BPF_PROG_RUN); + bpf_prog_run); rcu_read_unlock(); return !allow; @@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sysctl(struct ctl_table_header *head, rcu_read_lock(); cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(current); - ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN); + ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[type], &ctx, bpf_prog_run); rcu_read_unlock(); kfree(ctx.cur_val); @@ -1386,7 +1386,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int *level, lock_sock(sk); ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT], - &ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN); + &ctx, bpf_prog_run); release_sock(sk); if (!ret) { @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, lock_sock(sk); ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT], - &ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN); + &ctx, bpf_prog_run); release_sock(sk); if (!ret) { @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_getsockopt_kern(struct sock *sk, int level, */ ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY(cgrp->bpf.effective[BPF_CGROUP_GETSOCKOPT], - &ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN); + &ctx, bpf_prog_run); if (!ret) return -EPERM; |