summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>2023-12-02 09:56:58 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-12-02 11:36:50 -0800
commit8fa4ecd49b81ccd9d1d87f1c8b2260e218644878 (patch)
tree6c677d87b16c5c361795841d024fb1a5f81c9944 /kernel/bpf/verifier.c
parent0acd03a5bd188b0c501d285d938439618bd855c4 (diff)
bpf: enforce exact retval range on subprog/callback exit
Instead of relying on potentially imprecise tnum representation of expected return value range for callbacks and subprogs, validate that smin/smax range satisfy exact expected range of return values. E.g., if callback would need to return [0, 2] range, tnum can't represent this precisely and instead will allow [0, 3] range. By checking smin/smax range, we can make sure that subprog/callback indeed returns only valid [0, 2] range. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-5-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c33
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 849fbf47b5f3..f3d9d7de68da 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2305,6 +2305,11 @@ static void init_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
regs[BPF_REG_FP].frameno = state->frameno;
}
+static struct bpf_retval_range retval_range(s32 minval, s32 maxval)
+{
+ return (struct bpf_retval_range){ minval, maxval };
+}
+
#define BPF_MAIN_FUNC (-1)
static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
struct bpf_func_state *state,
@@ -2313,7 +2318,7 @@ static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
state->callsite = callsite;
state->frameno = frameno;
state->subprogno = subprogno;
- state->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 0);
+ state->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 0);
init_reg_state(env, state);
mark_verifier_state_scratched(env);
}
@@ -9396,7 +9401,7 @@ static int set_map_elem_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return err;
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9418,7 +9423,7 @@ static int set_loop_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9448,7 +9453,7 @@ static int set_timer_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_async_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9476,7 +9481,7 @@ static int set_find_vma_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9499,7 +9504,7 @@ static int set_user_ringbuf_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9531,7 +9536,7 @@ static int set_rbtree_add_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
- callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ callee->callback_ret_range = retval_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -9560,6 +9565,11 @@ static bool in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return is_rbtree_lock_required_kfunc(kfunc_btf_id);
}
+static bool retval_range_within(struct bpf_retval_range range, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
+{
+ return range.minval <= reg->smin_value && reg->smax_value <= range.maxval;
+}
+
static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
{
struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state, *prev_st;
@@ -9583,9 +9593,6 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
caller = state->frame[state->curframe - 1];
if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
- /* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
- struct tnum range = callee->callback_ret_range;
-
if (r0->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
verbose(env, "R0 not a scalar value\n");
return -EACCES;
@@ -9597,7 +9604,11 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
if (err)
return err;
- if (!tnum_in(range, r0->var_off)) {
+ /* enforce R0 return value range */
+ if (!retval_range_within(callee->callback_ret_range, r0)) {
+ struct tnum range = tnum_range(callee->callback_ret_range.minval,
+ callee->callback_ret_range.maxval);
+
verbose_invalid_scalar(env, r0, &range, "callback return", "R0");
return -EINVAL;
}