summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/cpuset.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>2014-10-20 15:50:30 +0400
committerTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>2014-10-27 11:15:27 -0400
commit344736f29b359790facd0b7a521e367f1715c11c (patch)
treec32487de22e7640a828f28819b5707790ede5105 /kernel/cpuset.c
parent8447a0fee974433f7e0035fd30e1edecf00e014f (diff)
cpuset: simplify cpuset_node_allowed API
Current cpuset API for checking if a zone/node is allowed to allocate from looks rather awkward. We have hardwall and softwall versions of cpuset_node_allowed with the softwall version doing literally the same as the hardwall version if __GFP_HARDWALL is passed to it in gfp flags. If it isn't, the softwall version may check the given node against the enclosing hardwall cpuset, which it needs to take the callback lock to do. Such a distinction was introduced by commit 02a0e53d8227 ("cpuset: rework cpuset_zone_allowed api"). Before, we had the only version with the __GFP_HARDWALL flag determining its behavior. The purpose of the commit was to avoid sleep-in-atomic bugs when someone would mistakenly call the function without the __GFP_HARDWALL flag for an atomic allocation. The suffixes introduced were intended to make the callers think before using the function. However, since the callback lock was converted from mutex to spinlock by the previous patch, the softwall check function cannot sleep, and these precautions are no longer necessary. So let's simplify the API back to the single check. Suggested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/cpuset.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/cpuset.c55
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 53 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index f21ba868f0d1..38f7433c1cd2 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
}
/**
- * cpuset_node_allowed_softwall - Can we allocate on a memory node?
+ * cpuset_node_allowed - Can we allocate on a memory node?
* @node: is this an allowed node?
* @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
*
@@ -2465,13 +2465,6 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
* flag, yes.
* Otherwise, no.
*
- * If __GFP_HARDWALL is set, cpuset_node_allowed_softwall() reduces to
- * cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(). Otherwise, cpuset_node_allowed_softwall()
- * might sleep, and might allow a node from an enclosing cpuset.
- *
- * cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall() only handles the simpler case of hardwall
- * cpusets, and never sleeps.
- *
* The __GFP_THISNODE placement logic is really handled elsewhere,
* by forcibly using a zonelist starting at a specified node, and by
* (in get_page_from_freelist()) refusing to consider the zones for
@@ -2506,13 +2499,8 @@ static struct cpuset *nearest_hardwall_ancestor(struct cpuset *cs)
* TIF_MEMDIE - any node ok
* GFP_KERNEL - any node in enclosing hardwalled cpuset ok
* GFP_USER - only nodes in current tasks mems allowed ok.
- *
- * Rule:
- * Don't call cpuset_node_allowed_softwall if you can't sleep, unless you
- * pass in the __GFP_HARDWALL flag set in gfp_flag, which disables
- * the code that might scan up ancestor cpusets and sleep.
*/
-int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+int __cpuset_node_allowed(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
struct cpuset *cs; /* current cpuset ancestors */
int allowed; /* is allocation in zone z allowed? */
@@ -2520,7 +2508,6 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
return 1;
- might_sleep_if(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_HARDWALL));
if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed))
return 1;
/*
@@ -2547,44 +2534,6 @@ int __cpuset_node_allowed_softwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
return allowed;
}
-/*
- * cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall - Can we allocate on a memory node?
- * @node: is this an allowed node?
- * @gfp_mask: memory allocation flags
- *
- * If we're in interrupt, yes, we can always allocate. If __GFP_THISNODE is
- * set, yes, we can always allocate. If node is in our task's mems_allowed,
- * yes. If the task has been OOM killed and has access to memory reserves as
- * specified by the TIF_MEMDIE flag, yes.
- * Otherwise, no.
- *
- * The __GFP_THISNODE placement logic is really handled elsewhere,
- * by forcibly using a zonelist starting at a specified node, and by
- * (in get_page_from_freelist()) refusing to consider the zones for
- * any node on the zonelist except the first. By the time any such
- * calls get to this routine, we should just shut up and say 'yes'.
- *
- * Unlike the cpuset_node_allowed_softwall() variant, above,
- * this variant requires that the node be in the current task's
- * mems_allowed or that we're in interrupt. It does not scan up the
- * cpuset hierarchy for the nearest enclosing mem_exclusive cpuset.
- * It never sleeps.
- */
-int __cpuset_node_allowed_hardwall(int node, gfp_t gfp_mask)
-{
- if (in_interrupt() || (gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE))
- return 1;
- if (node_isset(node, current->mems_allowed))
- return 1;
- /*
- * Allow tasks that have access to memory reserves because they have
- * been OOM killed to get memory anywhere.
- */
- if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)))
- return 1;
- return 0;
-}
-
/**
* cpuset_mem_spread_node() - On which node to begin search for a file page
* cpuset_slab_spread_node() - On which node to begin search for a slab page