genirq/msi: Provide struct msi_parent_ops

MSI parent domains must have some control over the MSI domains which are
built on top. On domain creation they need to fill in e.g. architecture
specific chip callbacks or msi domain ops to make the outermost domain
parent agnostic which is obviously required for architecture independence
etc.

The structure contains:

    1) A bitfield which exposes the supported functional features. This
       allows to check for features and is also used in the initialization
       callback to mask out unsupported features when the actual domain
       implementation requests a broader range, e.g. on x86 PCI multi-MSI
       is only supported by remapping domains but not by the underlying
       vector domain. The PCI/MSI code can then always request multi-MSI
       support, but the resulting feature set after creation might not
       have it set.

    2) An optional string prefix which is put in front of domain and chip
       names during creation of the MSI domain. That allows to keep the
       naming schemes e.g. on x86 where PCI-MSI domains have a IR- prefix
       when interrupt remapping is enabled.

    3) An initialization callback to sanity check the domain info of
       the to be created MSI domain, to restrict features and to
       apply changes in MSI ops and interrupt chip callbacks to
       accomodate to the particular MSI parent implementation and/or
       the underlying hierarchy.

Add a conveniance function to delegate the initialization from the
MSI parent domain to an underlying domain in the hierarchy.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124232325.382485843@linutronix.de

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index 8e653f089f82..c368116e8b08 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -788,6 +788,47 @@ struct irq_domain *msi_create_irq_domain(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
 	return domain;
 }
 
+/**
+ * msi_parent_init_dev_msi_info - Delegate initialization of device MSI info down
+ *				  in the domain hierarchy
+ * @dev:		The device for which the domain should be created
+ * @domain:		The domain in the hierarchy this op is being called on
+ * @msi_parent_domain:	The IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT domain for the child to
+ *			be created
+ * @msi_child_info:	The MSI domain info of the IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_DEVICE
+ *			domain to be created
+ *
+ * Return: true on success, false otherwise
+ *
+ * This is the most complex problem of per device MSI domains and the
+ * underlying interrupt domain hierarchy:
+ *
+ * The device domain to be initialized requests the broadest feature set
+ * possible and the underlying domain hierarchy puts restrictions on it.
+ *
+ * That's trivial for a simple parent->child relationship, but it gets
+ * interesting with an intermediate domain: root->parent->child.  The
+ * intermediate 'parent' can expand the capabilities which the 'root'
+ * domain is providing. So that creates a classic hen and egg problem:
+ * Which entity is doing the restrictions/expansions?
+ *
+ * One solution is to let the root domain handle the initialization that's
+ * why there is the @domain and the @msi_parent_domain pointer.
+ */
+bool msi_parent_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev, struct irq_domain *domain,
+				  struct irq_domain *msi_parent_domain,
+				  struct msi_domain_info *msi_child_info)
+{
+	struct irq_domain *parent = domain->parent;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent || !parent->msi_parent_ops ||
+			 !parent->msi_parent_ops->init_dev_msi_info))
+		return false;
+
+	return parent->msi_parent_ops->init_dev_msi_info(dev, parent, msi_parent_domain,
+							 msi_child_info);
+}
+
 int msi_domain_prepare_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
 			    int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *arg)
 {