summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>2018-11-27 12:01:10 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2018-12-11 14:54:57 +0100
commit80eb865768703c0f85a0603762742ae1dedf21f0 (patch)
tree54656be96ac5f6e3a06199911a0b0122129b4082 /kernel/locking
parentfe27b0de8dfcdf8482558ce5d25e697fe74d851e (diff)
sched/fair: Clean up comment in nohz_idle_balance()
Concerning the comment associated to the atomic_fetch_andnot() in nohz_idle_balance(), Vincent explains [1]: "[...] the comment is useless and can be removed [...] it was referring to a line code above the comment that was present in a previous iteration of the patchset. This line disappeared in final version but the comment has stayed." So remove the comment. Vincent also points out that the full ordering associated to the atomic_fetch_andnot() primitive could be relaxed, but this patch insists on the current more conservative/fully ordered solution: "Performance" isn't a concern, stay away from "correctness"/subtle relaxed (re)ordering if possible..., just make sure not to confuse the next reader with misleading/out-of-date comments. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAKfTPtBjA-oCBRkO6__npQwL3+HLjzk7riCcPU1R7YdO-EpuZg@mail.gmail.com Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181127110110.5533-1-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions