diff options
| author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2018-10-02 16:19:18 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-10-03 08:46:03 +0200 |
| commit | ce52a18db45842f5b992851a552bd7f6acb2241b (patch) | |
| tree | d4a2faed3b80b59485c8621bec27ed43432d7475 /kernel/locking | |
| parent | 8ee10862476ef8b9e81e5b521205fd5c620b4ffb (diff) | |
locking/lockdep: Add a faster path in __lock_release()
When __lock_release() is called, the most likely unlock scenario is
on the innermost lock in the chain. In this case, we can skip some of
the checks and provide a faster path to completion.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1538511560-10090-4-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index a5d7db558928..511d30f88bce 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -3626,6 +3626,13 @@ __lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip) curr->lockdep_depth = i; curr->curr_chain_key = hlock->prev_chain_key; + /* + * The most likely case is when the unlock is on the innermost + * lock. In this case, we are done! + */ + if (i == depth-1) + return 1; + if (reacquire_held_locks(curr, depth, i + 1)) return 0; @@ -3633,10 +3640,14 @@ __lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip) * We had N bottles of beer on the wall, we drank one, but now * there's not N-1 bottles of beer left on the wall... */ - if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1)) - return 0; + DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth-1); - return 1; + /* + * Since reacquire_held_locks() would have called check_chain_key() + * indirectly via __lock_acquire(), we don't need to do it again + * on return. + */ + return 0; } static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read) |