summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>2022-03-21 18:41:46 -0700
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>2022-06-20 09:21:50 -0700
commit2403e8044f222e7c816fb2416661f5f469662973 (patch)
tree1ccf9e0604f16744eb3707e11560af2872a6304f /kernel/rcu/rcu.h
parenta111daf0c53ae91e71fd2bfe7497862d14132e3e (diff)
rcu: Make normal polling GP be more precise about sequence numbers
Currently, poll_state_synchronize_rcu() uses rcu_seq_done() to check whether the specified grace period has completed. However, rcu_seq_done() does a simple comparison that reserves have of the sequence-number space for uncompleted grace periods. This has the unfortunate side-effect of not handling sequence-number wrap gracefully. Of course, one can argue that if someone has already waited for half of the full range of grace periods, they can wait for the other half, but why wait at all in this case? This commit therefore creates a rcu_seq_done_exact() that counts as uncompleted only the two grace periods during which the sequence number might have been handed out, while still being uncompleted. This way, if sequence-number wrap happens to hit that range, at most two additional grace periods need be waited for. This commit is in preparation for polled expedited grace periods. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/ Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu/rcu.h')
-rw-r--r--kernel/rcu/rcu.h12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
index 4916077119f3..0adb55941aeb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu.h
@@ -120,6 +120,18 @@ static inline bool rcu_seq_done(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long s)
}
/*
+ * Given a snapshot from rcu_seq_snap(), determine whether or not a
+ * full update-side operation has occurred, but do not allow the
+ * (ULONG_MAX / 2) safety-factor/guard-band.
+ */
+static inline bool rcu_seq_done_exact(unsigned long *sp, unsigned long s)
+{
+ unsigned long cur_s = READ_ONCE(*sp);
+
+ return ULONG_CMP_GE(cur_s, s) || ULONG_CMP_LT(cur_s, s - (2 * RCU_SEQ_STATE_MASK + 1));
+}
+
+/*
* Has a grace period completed since the time the old gp_seq was collected?
*/
static inline bool rcu_seq_completed_gp(unsigned long old, unsigned long new)