summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>2017-10-23 23:53:08 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-10-25 10:47:47 +0900
commite87c6bc3852b981e71c757be20771546ce9f76f3 (patch)
treebad3be630137d8e873f4ad5a1ea77b4aa1853184 /kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
parent0b4c6841fee03e096b735074a0c4aab3a8e92986 (diff)
bpf: permit multiple bpf attachments for a single perf event
This patch enables multiple bpf attachments for a kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint single trace event. Each trace_event keeps a list of attached perf events. When an event happens, all attached bpf programs will be executed based on the order of attachment. A global bpf_event_mutex lock is introduced to protect prog_array attaching and detaching. An alternative will be introduce a mutex lock in every trace_event_call structure, but it takes a lot of extra memory. So a global bpf_event_mutex lock is a good compromise. The bpf prog detachment involves allocation of memory. If the allocation fails, a dummy do-nothing program will replace to-be-detached program in-place. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c82
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 3126da2f468a..b65011d320e3 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
/**
* trace_call_bpf - invoke BPF program
- * @prog: BPF program
+ * @call: tracepoint event
* @ctx: opaque context pointer
*
* kprobe handlers execute BPF programs via this helper.
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* 1 - store kprobe event into ring buffer
* Other values are reserved and currently alias to 1
*/
-unsigned int trace_call_bpf(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
+unsigned int trace_call_bpf(struct trace_event_call *call, void *ctx)
{
unsigned int ret;
@@ -49,9 +49,22 @@ unsigned int trace_call_bpf(struct bpf_prog *prog, void *ctx)
goto out;
}
- rcu_read_lock();
- ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, ctx);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ /*
+ * Instead of moving rcu_read_lock/rcu_dereference/rcu_read_unlock
+ * to all call sites, we did a bpf_prog_array_valid() there to check
+ * whether call->prog_array is empty or not, which is
+ * a heurisitc to speed up execution.
+ *
+ * If bpf_prog_array_valid() fetched prog_array was
+ * non-NULL, we go into trace_call_bpf() and do the actual
+ * proper rcu_dereference() under RCU lock.
+ * If it turns out that prog_array is NULL then, we bail out.
+ * For the opposite, if the bpf_prog_array_valid() fetched pointer
+ * was NULL, you'll skip the prog_array with the risk of missing
+ * out of events when it was updated in between this and the
+ * rcu_dereference() which is accepted risk.
+ */
+ ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CHECK(call->prog_array, ctx, BPF_PROG_RUN);
out:
__this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
@@ -741,3 +754,62 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops perf_event_verifier_ops = {
const struct bpf_prog_ops perf_event_prog_ops = {
};
+
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(bpf_event_mutex);
+
+int perf_event_attach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array;
+ struct bpf_prog_array *new_array;
+ int ret = -EEXIST;
+
+ mutex_lock(&bpf_event_mutex);
+
+ if (event->prog)
+ goto out;
+
+ old_array = rcu_dereference_protected(event->tp_event->prog_array,
+ lockdep_is_held(&bpf_event_mutex));
+ ret = bpf_prog_array_copy(old_array, NULL, prog, &new_array);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* set the new array to event->tp_event and set event->prog */
+ event->prog = prog;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array);
+ bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void perf_event_detach_bpf_prog(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *old_array;
+ struct bpf_prog_array *new_array;
+ int ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&bpf_event_mutex);
+
+ if (!event->prog)
+ goto out;
+
+ old_array = rcu_dereference_protected(event->tp_event->prog_array,
+ lockdep_is_held(&bpf_event_mutex));
+
+ ret = bpf_prog_array_copy(old_array, event->prog, NULL, &new_array);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ bpf_prog_array_delete_safe(old_array, event->prog);
+ } else {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(event->tp_event->prog_array, new_array);
+ bpf_prog_array_free(old_array);
+ }
+
+ bpf_prog_put(event->prog);
+ event->prog = NULL;
+
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&bpf_event_mutex);
+}