summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-01-16 10:04:40 +0100
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-01-16 10:04:40 +0100
commit3981f955eb27fd4f52b8cef198091530811229f2 (patch)
tree5e85999c1a8c4a7ee73f025ffef47f649312a8dc /kernel
parent567110f147b352020138573a90476a1522210f62 (diff)
parent85ddd9c3173102930c16b0cfe8dbb771af434532 (diff)
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf 2020-01-15 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree. We've added 12 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain a total of 13 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Fix refcount leak for TCP time wait and request sockets for socket lookup related BPF helpers, from Lorenz Bauer. 2) Fix wrong verification of ARSH instruction under ALU32, from Daniel Borkmann. 3) Batch of several sockmap and related TLS fixes found while operating more complex BPF programs with Cilium and OpenSSL, from John Fastabend. 4) Fix sockmap to read psock's ingress_msg queue before regular sk_receive_queue() to avoid purging data upon teardown, from Lingpeng Chen. 5) Fix printing incorrect pointer in bpftool's btf_dump_ptr() in order to properly dump a BPF map's value with BTF, from Martin KaFai Lau. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/tnum.c9
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c13
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/tnum.c b/kernel/bpf/tnum.c
index ca52b9642943..d4f335a9a899 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/tnum.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/tnum.c
@@ -44,14 +44,19 @@ struct tnum tnum_rshift(struct tnum a, u8 shift)
return TNUM(a.value >> shift, a.mask >> shift);
}
-struct tnum tnum_arshift(struct tnum a, u8 min_shift)
+struct tnum tnum_arshift(struct tnum a, u8 min_shift, u8 insn_bitness)
{
/* if a.value is negative, arithmetic shifting by minimum shift
* will have larger negative offset compared to more shifting.
* If a.value is nonnegative, arithmetic shifting by minimum shift
* will have larger positive offset compare to more shifting.
*/
- return TNUM((s64)a.value >> min_shift, (s64)a.mask >> min_shift);
+ if (insn_bitness == 32)
+ return TNUM((u32)(((s32)a.value) >> min_shift),
+ (u32)(((s32)a.mask) >> min_shift));
+ else
+ return TNUM((s64)a.value >> min_shift,
+ (s64)a.mask >> min_shift);
}
struct tnum tnum_add(struct tnum a, struct tnum b)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ce85e7041f0c..7d530ce8719d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5049,9 +5049,16 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
/* Upon reaching here, src_known is true and
* umax_val is equal to umin_val.
*/
- dst_reg->smin_value >>= umin_val;
- dst_reg->smax_value >>= umin_val;
- dst_reg->var_off = tnum_arshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val);
+ if (insn_bitness == 32) {
+ dst_reg->smin_value = (u32)(((s32)dst_reg->smin_value) >> umin_val);
+ dst_reg->smax_value = (u32)(((s32)dst_reg->smax_value) >> umin_val);
+ } else {
+ dst_reg->smin_value >>= umin_val;
+ dst_reg->smax_value >>= umin_val;
+ }
+
+ dst_reg->var_off = tnum_arshift(dst_reg->var_off, umin_val,
+ insn_bitness);
/* blow away the dst_reg umin_value/umax_value and rely on
* dst_reg var_off to refine the result.