summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>2025-04-10 19:14:45 +0000
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2025-05-11 17:48:29 -0700
commit271152a973cb01c135d29e91d1a05f51fbd88a9c (patch)
tree47697e79f69fde5a0d0964a86a4117a33b6376ce /lib
parent300a5b4ffedf826998ed1f1b5d107e9fb0ef7579 (diff)
maple_tree: add sufficient height
In order to support rebalancing and spanning stores using less than the worst case number of nodes, we need to track more than just the vacant height. Using only vacant height to reduce the worst case maple node allocation count can lead to a shortcoming of nodes in the following scenarios. For rebalancing writes, when a leaf node becomes insufficient, it may be combined with a sibling into a single node. This means that the parent node which has entries for this children will lose one entry. If this parent node was just meeting the minimum entries, losing one entry will now cause this parent node to be insufficient. This leads to a cascading operation of rebalancing at different levels and can lead to more node allocations than simply using vacant height can return. For spanning writes, a similar situation occurs. At the location at which a spanning write is detected, the number of ancestor nodes may similarly need to rebalanced into a smaller number of nodes and the same cascading situation could occur. To use less than the full height of the tree for the number of allocations, we also need to track the height at which a non-leaf node cannot become insufficient. This means even if a rebalance occurs to a child of this node, it currently has enough entries that it can lose one without any further action. This field is stored in the maple write state as sufficient height. In mas_prealloc_calc() when figuring out how many nodes to allocate, we check if the vacant node is lower in the tree than a sufficient node (has a larger value). If it is, we cannot use the vacant height and must use the difference in the height and sufficient height as the basis for the number of nodes needed. An off by one bug was also discovered in mast_overflow() where it is using >= rather than >. This caused extra iterations of the mas_spanning_rebalance() loop and lead to unneeded allocations. A test is also added to check the number of allocations is correct. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250410191446.2474640-6-sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/maple_tree.c19
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 5610b3742a79..aa139668bcae 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ static inline bool mast_sufficient(struct maple_subtree_state *mast)
*/
static inline bool mast_overflow(struct maple_subtree_state *mast)
{
- if (mast->bn->b_end >= mt_slot_count(mast->orig_l->node))
+ if (mast->bn->b_end > mt_slot_count(mast->orig_l->node))
return true;
return false;
@@ -3550,6 +3550,13 @@ static bool mas_wr_walk(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas)
if (mas->end < mt_slots[wr_mas->type] - 1)
wr_mas->vacant_height = mas->depth + 1;
+ if (ma_is_root(mas_mn(mas))) {
+ /* root needs more than 2 entries to be sufficient + 1 */
+ if (mas->end > 2)
+ wr_mas->sufficient_height = 1;
+ } else if (mas->end > mt_min_slots[wr_mas->type] + 1)
+ wr_mas->sufficient_height = mas->depth + 1;
+
mas_wr_walk_traverse(wr_mas);
}
@@ -4185,13 +4192,19 @@ static inline int mas_prealloc_calc(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas, void *entry)
ret = 0;
break;
case wr_spanning_store:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(ret != height * 3 + 1);
+ if (wr_mas->sufficient_height < wr_mas->vacant_height)
+ ret = (height - wr_mas->sufficient_height) * 3 + 1;
+ else
+ ret = delta * 3 + 1;
break;
case wr_split_store:
ret = delta * 2 + 1;
break;
case wr_rebalance:
- ret = height * 2 + 1;
+ if (wr_mas->sufficient_height < wr_mas->vacant_height)
+ ret = (height - wr_mas->sufficient_height) * 2 + 1;
+ else
+ ret = delta * 2 + 1;
break;
case wr_node_store:
ret = mt_in_rcu(mas->tree) ? 1 : 0;