summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/gup.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>2021-09-02 14:59:09 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-09-03 09:58:16 -0700
commit884a6e5d1f93b5032e5d6dd2a183f8b3f008416b (patch)
treec44eb9149b246eb27ade53abde2829ef9ec1f0ca /mm/gup.c
parent79c28a41672278283fa72e03d0bf80e6644d4ac4 (diff)
mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events
Reclaim-based migration is attempting to optimize data placement in memory based on the system topology. If the system changes, so must the migration ordering. The implementation is conceptually simple and entirely unoptimized. On any memory or CPU hotplug events, assume that a node was added or removed and recalculate all migration targets. This ensures that the node_demotion[] array is always ready to be used in case the new reclaim mode is enabled. This recalculation is far from optimal, most glaringly that it does not even attempt to figure out the hotplug event would have some *actual* effect on the demotion order. But, given the expected paucity of hotplug events, this should be fine. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210721063926.3024591-2-ying.huang@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210715055145.195411-3-ying.huang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/gup.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions