summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/vmstat.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>2016-07-28 15:45:24 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2016-07-28 16:07:41 -0700
commit75ef7184053989118d3814c558a9af62e7376a58 (patch)
tree4e343fb8be9c58d7ffb96076968c866c7d64ea11 /mm/vmstat.c
parenta621184ac6dd415664eae458ed1727ba235f5450 (diff)
mm, vmstat: add infrastructure for per-node vmstats
Patchset: "Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v9" This series moves LRUs from the zones to the node. While this is a current rebase, the test results were based on mmotm as of June 23rd. Conceptually, this series is simple but there are a lot of details. Some of the broad motivations for this are; 1. The residency of a page partially depends on what zone the page was allocated from. This is partially combatted by the fair zone allocation policy but that is a partial solution that introduces overhead in the page allocator paths. 2. Currently, reclaim on node 0 behaves slightly different to node 1. For example, direct reclaim scans in zonelist order and reclaims even if the zone is over the high watermark regardless of the age of pages in that LRU. Kswapd on the other hand starts reclaim on the highest unbalanced zone. A difference in distribution of file/anon pages due to when they were allocated results can result in a difference in again. While the fair zone allocation policy mitigates some of the problems here, the page reclaim results on a multi-zone node will always be different to a single-zone node. it was scheduled on as a result. 3. kswapd and the page allocator scan zones in the opposite order to avoid interfering with each other but it's sensitive to timing. This mitigates the page allocator using pages that were allocated very recently in the ideal case but it's sensitive to timing. When kswapd is allocating from lower zones then it's great but during the rebalancing of the highest zone, the page allocator and kswapd interfere with each other. It's worse if the highest zone is small and difficult to balance. 4. slab shrinkers are node-based which makes it harder to identify the exact relationship between slab reclaim and LRU reclaim. The reason we have zone-based reclaim is that we used to have large highmem zones in common configurations and it was necessary to quickly find ZONE_NORMAL pages for reclaim. Today, this is much less of a concern as machines with lots of memory will (or should) use 64-bit kernels. Combinations of 32-bit hardware and 64-bit hardware are rare. Machines that do use highmem should have relatively low highmem:lowmem ratios than we worried about in the past. Conceptually, moving to node LRUs should be easier to understand. The page allocator plays fewer tricks to game reclaim and reclaim behaves similarly on all nodes. The series has been tested on a 16 core UMA machine and a 2-socket 48 core NUMA machine. The UMA results are presented in most cases as the NUMA machine behaved similarly. pagealloc --------- This is a microbenchmark that shows the benefit of removing the fair zone allocation policy. It was tested uip to order-4 but only orders 0 and 1 are shown as the other orders were comparable. 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Min total-odr0-1 490.00 ( 0.00%) 457.00 ( 6.73%) Min total-odr0-2 347.00 ( 0.00%) 329.00 ( 5.19%) Min total-odr0-4 288.00 ( 0.00%) 273.00 ( 5.21%) Min total-odr0-8 251.00 ( 0.00%) 239.00 ( 4.78%) Min total-odr0-16 234.00 ( 0.00%) 222.00 ( 5.13%) Min total-odr0-32 223.00 ( 0.00%) 211.00 ( 5.38%) Min total-odr0-64 217.00 ( 0.00%) 208.00 ( 4.15%) Min total-odr0-128 214.00 ( 0.00%) 204.00 ( 4.67%) Min total-odr0-256 250.00 ( 0.00%) 230.00 ( 8.00%) Min total-odr0-512 271.00 ( 0.00%) 269.00 ( 0.74%) Min total-odr0-1024 291.00 ( 0.00%) 282.00 ( 3.09%) Min total-odr0-2048 303.00 ( 0.00%) 296.00 ( 2.31%) Min total-odr0-4096 311.00 ( 0.00%) 309.00 ( 0.64%) Min total-odr0-8192 316.00 ( 0.00%) 314.00 ( 0.63%) Min total-odr0-16384 317.00 ( 0.00%) 315.00 ( 0.63%) Min total-odr1-1 742.00 ( 0.00%) 712.00 ( 4.04%) Min total-odr1-2 562.00 ( 0.00%) 530.00 ( 5.69%) Min total-odr1-4 457.00 ( 0.00%) 433.00 ( 5.25%) Min total-odr1-8 411.00 ( 0.00%) 381.00 ( 7.30%) Min total-odr1-16 381.00 ( 0.00%) 356.00 ( 6.56%) Min total-odr1-32 372.00 ( 0.00%) 346.00 ( 6.99%) Min total-odr1-64 372.00 ( 0.00%) 343.00 ( 7.80%) Min total-odr1-128 375.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 6.40%) Min total-odr1-256 379.00 ( 0.00%) 351.00 ( 7.39%) Min total-odr1-512 385.00 ( 0.00%) 355.00 ( 7.79%) Min total-odr1-1024 386.00 ( 0.00%) 358.00 ( 7.25%) Min total-odr1-2048 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%) Min total-odr1-4096 390.00 ( 0.00%) 362.00 ( 7.18%) Min total-odr1-8192 388.00 ( 0.00%) 363.00 ( 6.44%) This shows a steady improvement throughout. The primary benefit is from reduced system CPU usage which is obvious from the overall times; 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 User 189.19 191.80 System 2604.45 2533.56 Elapsed 2855.30 2786.39 The vmstats also showed that the fair zone allocation policy was definitely removed as can be seen here; 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 DMA32 allocs 28794729769 0 Normal allocs 48432501431 77227309877 Movable allocs 0 0 tiobench on ext4 ---------------- tiobench is a benchmark that artifically benefits if old pages remain resident while new pages get reclaimed. The fair zone allocation policy mitigates this problem so pages age fairly. While the benchmark has problems, it is important that tiobench performance remains constant as it implies that page aging problems that the fair zone allocation policy fixes are not re-introduced. 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Min PotentialReadSpeed 89.65 ( 0.00%) 90.21 ( 0.62%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-1 82.68 ( 0.00%) 82.01 ( -0.81%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-2 72.76 ( 0.00%) 72.07 ( -0.95%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-4 75.13 ( 0.00%) 74.92 ( -0.28%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-8 64.91 ( 0.00%) 65.19 ( 0.43%) Min SeqRead-MB/sec-16 62.24 ( 0.00%) 62.22 ( -0.03%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-1 0.88 ( 0.00%) 0.88 ( 0.00%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-2 0.95 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( -3.16%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-4 1.43 ( 0.00%) 1.34 ( -6.29%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-8 1.61 ( 0.00%) 1.60 ( -0.62%) Min RandRead-MB/sec-16 1.80 ( 0.00%) 1.90 ( 5.56%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-1 76.41 ( 0.00%) 76.85 ( 0.58%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-2 74.11 ( 0.00%) 73.54 ( -0.77%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-4 80.05 ( 0.00%) 80.13 ( 0.10%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-8 72.88 ( 0.00%) 73.20 ( 0.44%) Min SeqWrite-MB/sec-16 75.91 ( 0.00%) 76.44 ( 0.70%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-1 1.18 ( 0.00%) 1.14 ( -3.39%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-2 1.02 ( 0.00%) 1.03 ( 0.98%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-4 1.05 ( 0.00%) 0.98 ( -6.67%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-8 0.89 ( 0.00%) 0.92 ( 3.37%) Min RandWrite-MB/sec-16 0.92 ( 0.00%) 0.93 ( 1.09%) 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 approx-v9 User 645.72 525.90 System 403.85 331.75 Elapsed 6795.36 6783.67 This shows that the series has little or not impact on tiobench which is desirable and a reduction in system CPU usage. It indicates that the fair zone allocation policy was removed in a manner that didn't reintroduce one class of page aging bug. There were only minor differences in overall reclaim activity 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 Minor Faults 645838 647465 Major Faults 573 640 Swap Ins 0 0 Swap Outs 0 0 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 46041453 44190646 Normal allocs 78053072 79887245 Movable allocs 0 0 Allocation stalls 24 67 Stall zone DMA 0 0 Stall zone DMA32 0 0 Stall zone Normal 0 2 Stall zone HighMem 0 0 Stall zone Movable 0 65 Direct pages scanned 10969 30609 Kswapd pages scanned 93375144 93492094 Kswapd pages reclaimed 93372243 93489370 Direct pages reclaimed 10969 30609 Kswapd efficiency 99% 99% Kswapd velocity 13741.015 13781.934 Direct efficiency 100% 100% Direct velocity 1.614 4.512 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% kswapd activity was roughly comparable. There were differences in direct reclaim activity but negligible in the context of the overall workload (velocity of 4 pages per second with the patches applied, 1.6 pages per second in the baseline kernel). pgbench read-only large configuration on ext4 --------------------------------------------- pgbench is a database benchmark that can be sensitive to page reclaim decisions. This also checks if removing the fair zone allocation policy is safe pgbench Transactions 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 Hmean 1 188.26 ( 0.00%) 189.78 ( 0.81%) Hmean 5 330.66 ( 0.00%) 328.69 ( -0.59%) Hmean 12 370.32 ( 0.00%) 380.72 ( 2.81%) Hmean 21 368.89 ( 0.00%) 369.00 ( 0.03%) Hmean 30 382.14 ( 0.00%) 360.89 ( -5.56%) Hmean 32 428.87 ( 0.00%) 432.96 ( 0.95%) Negligible differences again. As with tiobench, overall reclaim activity was comparable. bonnie++ on ext4 ---------------- No interesting performance difference, negligible differences on reclaim stats. paralleldd on ext4 ------------------ This workload uses varying numbers of dd instances to read large amounts of data from disk. 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Amean Elapsd-1 186.04 ( 0.00%) 189.41 ( -1.82%) Amean Elapsd-3 192.27 ( 0.00%) 191.38 ( 0.46%) Amean Elapsd-5 185.21 ( 0.00%) 182.75 ( 1.33%) Amean Elapsd-7 183.71 ( 0.00%) 182.11 ( 0.87%) Amean Elapsd-12 180.96 ( 0.00%) 181.58 ( -0.35%) Amean Elapsd-16 181.36 ( 0.00%) 183.72 ( -1.30%) 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 User 1548.01 1552.44 System 8609.71 8515.08 Elapsed 3587.10 3594.54 There is little or no change in performance but some drop in system CPU usage. 4.7.0-rc3 4.7.0-rc3 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v9 Minor Faults 362662 367360 Major Faults 1204 1143 Swap Ins 22 0 Swap Outs 2855 1029 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 31409797 28837521 Normal allocs 46611853 49231282 Movable allocs 0 0 Direct pages scanned 0 0 Kswapd pages scanned 40845270 40869088 Kswapd pages reclaimed 40830976 40855294 Direct pages reclaimed 0 0 Kswapd efficiency 99% 99% Kswapd velocity 11386.711 11369.769 Direct efficiency 100% 100% Direct velocity 0.000 0.000 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% Page writes by reclaim 2855 1029 Page writes file 0 0 Page writes anon 2855 1029 Page reclaim immediate 771 1628 Sector Reads 293312636 293536360 Sector Writes 18213568 18186480 Page rescued immediate 0 0 Slabs scanned 128257 132747 Direct inode steals 181 56 Kswapd inode steals 59 1131 It basically shows that kswapd was active at roughly the same rate in both kernels. There was also comparable slab scanning activity and direct reclaim was avoided in both cases. There appears to be a large difference in numbers of inodes reclaimed but the workload has few active inodes and is likely a timing artifact. stutter ------- stutter simulates a simple workload. One part uses a lot of anonymous memory, a second measures mmap latency and a third copies a large file. The primary metric is checking for mmap latency. stutter 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623 nodelru-v8 Min mmap 16.6283 ( 0.00%) 13.4258 ( 19.26%) 1st-qrtle mmap 54.7570 ( 0.00%) 34.9121 ( 36.24%) 2nd-qrtle mmap 57.3163 ( 0.00%) 46.1147 ( 19.54%) 3rd-qrtle mmap 58.9976 ( 0.00%) 47.1882 ( 20.02%) Max-90% mmap 59.7433 ( 0.00%) 47.4453 ( 20.58%) Max-93% mmap 60.1298 ( 0.00%) 47.6037 ( 20.83%) Max-95% mmap 73.4112 ( 0.00%) 82.8719 (-12.89%) Max-99% mmap 92.8542 ( 0.00%) 88.8870 ( 4.27%) Max mmap 1440.6569 ( 0.00%) 121.4201 ( 91.57%) Mean mmap 59.3493 ( 0.00%) 42.2991 ( 28.73%) Best99%Mean mmap 57.2121 ( 0.00%) 41.8207 ( 26.90%) Best95%Mean mmap 55.9113 ( 0.00%) 39.9620 ( 28.53%) Best90%Mean mmap 55.6199 ( 0.00%) 39.3124 ( 29.32%) Best50%Mean mmap 53.2183 ( 0.00%) 33.1307 ( 37.75%) Best10%Mean mmap 45.9842 ( 0.00%) 20.4040 ( 55.63%) Best5%Mean mmap 43.2256 ( 0.00%) 17.9654 ( 58.44%) Best1%Mean mmap 32.9388 ( 0.00%) 16.6875 ( 49.34%) This shows a number of improvements with the worst-case outlier greatly improved. Some of the vmstats are interesting 4.7.0-rc4 4.7.0-rc4 mmotm-20160623nodelru-v8 Swap Ins 163 502 Swap Outs 0 0 DMA allocs 0 0 DMA32 allocs 618719206 1381662383 Normal allocs 891235743 564138421 Movable allocs 0 0 Allocation stalls 2603 1 Direct pages scanned 216787 2 Kswapd pages scanned 50719775 41778378 Kswapd pages reclaimed 41541765 41777639 Direct pages reclaimed 209159 0 Kswapd efficiency 81% 99% Kswapd velocity 16859.554 14329.059 Direct efficiency 96% 0% Direct velocity 72.061 0.001 Percentage direct scans 0% 0% Page writes by reclaim 6215049 0 Page writes file 6215049 0 Page writes anon 0 0 Page reclaim immediate 70673 90 Sector Reads 81940800 81680456 Sector Writes 100158984 98816036 Page rescued immediate 0 0 Slabs scanned 1366954 22683 While this is not guaranteed in all cases, this particular test showed a large reduction in direct reclaim activity. It's also worth noting that no page writes were issued from reclaim context. This series is not without its hazards. There are at least three areas that I'm concerned with even though I could not reproduce any problems in that area. 1. Reclaim/compaction is going to be affected because the amount of reclaim is no longer targetted at a specific zone. Compaction works on a per-zone basis so there is no guarantee that reclaiming a few THP's worth page pages will have a positive impact on compaction success rates. 2. The Slab/LRU reclaim ratio is affected because the frequency the shrinkers are called is now different. This may or may not be a problem but if it is, it'll be because shrinkers are not called enough and some balancing is required. 3. The anon/file reclaim ratio may be affected. Pages about to be dirtied are distributed between zones and the fair zone allocation policy used to do something very similar for anon. The distribution is now different but not necessarily in any way that matters but it's still worth bearing in mind. VM statistic counters for reclaim decisions are zone-based. If the kernel is to reclaim on a per-node basis then we need to track per-node statistics but there is no infrastructure for that. The most notable change is that the old node_page_state is renamed to sum_zone_node_page_state. The new node_page_state takes a pglist_data and uses per-node stats but none exist yet. There is some renaming such as vm_stat to vm_zone_stat and the addition of vm_node_stat and the renaming of mod_state to mod_zone_state. Otherwise, this is mostly a mechanical patch with no functional change. There is a lot of similarity between the node and zone helpers which is unfortunate but there was no obvious way of reusing the code and maintaining type safety. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1467970510-21195-2-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmstat.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/vmstat.c295
1 files changed, 272 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
index 7997f52935c9..3345d396a99b 100644
--- a/mm/vmstat.c
+++ b/mm/vmstat.c
@@ -86,8 +86,10 @@ void vm_events_fold_cpu(int cpu)
*
* vm_stat contains the global counters
*/
-atomic_long_t vm_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_stat);
+atomic_long_t vm_zone_stat[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+atomic_long_t vm_node_stat[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_zone_stat);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_node_stat);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -167,19 +169,36 @@ int calculate_normal_threshold(struct zone *zone)
*/
void refresh_zone_stat_thresholds(void)
{
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat;
struct zone *zone;
int cpu;
int threshold;
+ /* Zero current pgdat thresholds */
+ for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ per_cpu_ptr(pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats, cpu)->stat_threshold = 0;
+ }
+ }
+
for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat = zone->zone_pgdat;
unsigned long max_drift, tolerate_drift;
threshold = calculate_normal_threshold(zone);
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ int pgdat_threshold;
+
per_cpu_ptr(zone->pageset, cpu)->stat_threshold
= threshold;
+ /* Base nodestat threshold on the largest populated zone. */
+ pgdat_threshold = per_cpu_ptr(pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats, cpu)->stat_threshold;
+ per_cpu_ptr(pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats, cpu)->stat_threshold
+ = max(threshold, pgdat_threshold);
+ }
+
/*
* Only set percpu_drift_mark if there is a danger that
* NR_FREE_PAGES reports the low watermark is ok when in fact
@@ -238,6 +257,26 @@ void __mod_zone_page_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mod_zone_page_state);
+void __mod_node_page_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item,
+ long delta)
+{
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *pcp = pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats;
+ s8 __percpu *p = pcp->vm_node_stat_diff + item;
+ long x;
+ long t;
+
+ x = delta + __this_cpu_read(*p);
+
+ t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
+
+ if (unlikely(x > t || x < -t)) {
+ node_page_state_add(x, pgdat, item);
+ x = 0;
+ }
+ __this_cpu_write(*p, x);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mod_node_page_state);
+
/*
* Optimized increment and decrement functions.
*
@@ -277,12 +316,34 @@ void __inc_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
}
}
+void __inc_node_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *pcp = pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats;
+ s8 __percpu *p = pcp->vm_node_stat_diff + item;
+ s8 v, t;
+
+ v = __this_cpu_inc_return(*p);
+ t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
+ if (unlikely(v > t)) {
+ s8 overstep = t >> 1;
+
+ node_page_state_add(v + overstep, pgdat, item);
+ __this_cpu_write(*p, -overstep);
+ }
+}
+
void __inc_zone_page_state(struct page *page, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
__inc_zone_state(page_zone(page), item);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__inc_zone_page_state);
+void __inc_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ __inc_node_state(page_pgdat(page), item);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__inc_node_page_state);
+
void __dec_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
struct per_cpu_pageset __percpu *pcp = zone->pageset;
@@ -299,12 +360,34 @@ void __dec_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
}
}
+void __dec_node_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *pcp = pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats;
+ s8 __percpu *p = pcp->vm_node_stat_diff + item;
+ s8 v, t;
+
+ v = __this_cpu_dec_return(*p);
+ t = __this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
+ if (unlikely(v < - t)) {
+ s8 overstep = t >> 1;
+
+ node_page_state_add(v - overstep, pgdat, item);
+ __this_cpu_write(*p, overstep);
+ }
+}
+
void __dec_zone_page_state(struct page *page, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
__dec_zone_state(page_zone(page), item);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dec_zone_page_state);
+void __dec_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ __dec_node_state(page_pgdat(page), item);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dec_node_page_state);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
/*
* If we have cmpxchg_local support then we do not need to incur the overhead
@@ -318,8 +401,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dec_zone_page_state);
* 1 Overstepping half of threshold
* -1 Overstepping minus half of threshold
*/
-static inline void mod_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
- long delta, int overstep_mode)
+static inline void mod_zone_state(struct zone *zone,
+ enum zone_stat_item item, long delta, int overstep_mode)
{
struct per_cpu_pageset __percpu *pcp = zone->pageset;
s8 __percpu *p = pcp->vm_stat_diff + item;
@@ -359,26 +442,88 @@ static inline void mod_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
void mod_zone_page_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item,
long delta)
{
- mod_state(zone, item, delta, 0);
+ mod_zone_state(zone, item, delta, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_zone_page_state);
void inc_zone_state(struct zone *zone, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
- mod_state(zone, item, 1, 1);
+ mod_zone_state(zone, item, 1, 1);
}
void inc_zone_page_state(struct page *page, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
- mod_state(page_zone(page), item, 1, 1);
+ mod_zone_state(page_zone(page), item, 1, 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_zone_page_state);
void dec_zone_page_state(struct page *page, enum zone_stat_item item)
{
- mod_state(page_zone(page), item, -1, -1);
+ mod_zone_state(page_zone(page), item, -1, -1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dec_zone_page_state);
+
+static inline void mod_node_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
+ enum node_stat_item item, int delta, int overstep_mode)
+{
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *pcp = pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats;
+ s8 __percpu *p = pcp->vm_node_stat_diff + item;
+ long o, n, t, z;
+
+ do {
+ z = 0; /* overflow to node counters */
+
+ /*
+ * The fetching of the stat_threshold is racy. We may apply
+ * a counter threshold to the wrong the cpu if we get
+ * rescheduled while executing here. However, the next
+ * counter update will apply the threshold again and
+ * therefore bring the counter under the threshold again.
+ *
+ * Most of the time the thresholds are the same anyways
+ * for all cpus in a node.
+ */
+ t = this_cpu_read(pcp->stat_threshold);
+
+ o = this_cpu_read(*p);
+ n = delta + o;
+
+ if (n > t || n < -t) {
+ int os = overstep_mode * (t >> 1) ;
+
+ /* Overflow must be added to node counters */
+ z = n + os;
+ n = -os;
+ }
+ } while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(*p, o, n) != o);
+
+ if (z)
+ node_page_state_add(z, pgdat, item);
+}
+
+void mod_node_page_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item,
+ long delta)
+{
+ mod_node_state(pgdat, item, delta, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_node_page_state);
+
+void inc_node_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ mod_node_state(pgdat, item, 1, 1);
+}
+
+void inc_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ mod_node_state(page_pgdat(page), item, 1, 1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_node_page_state);
+
+void dec_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ mod_node_state(page_pgdat(page), item, -1, -1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dec_node_page_state);
#else
/*
* Use interrupt disable to serialize counter updates
@@ -424,21 +569,69 @@ void dec_zone_page_state(struct page *page, enum zone_stat_item item)
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dec_zone_page_state);
-#endif
+void inc_node_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ __inc_node_state(pgdat, item);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_node_state);
+
+void mod_node_page_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat, enum node_stat_item item,
+ long delta)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ __mod_node_page_state(pgdat, item, delta);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(mod_node_page_state);
+
+void inc_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat;
+
+ pgdat = page_pgdat(page);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ __inc_node_state(pgdat, item);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inc_node_page_state);
+
+void dec_node_page_state(struct page *page, enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ __dec_node_page_state(page, item);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(dec_node_page_state);
+#endif
/*
* Fold a differential into the global counters.
* Returns the number of counters updated.
*/
-static int fold_diff(int *diff)
+static int fold_diff(int *zone_diff, int *node_diff)
{
int i;
int changes = 0;
for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
- if (diff[i]) {
- atomic_long_add(diff[i], &vm_stat[i]);
+ if (zone_diff[i]) {
+ atomic_long_add(zone_diff[i], &vm_zone_stat[i]);
+ changes++;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
+ if (node_diff[i]) {
+ atomic_long_add(node_diff[i], &vm_node_stat[i]);
changes++;
}
return changes;
@@ -462,9 +655,11 @@ static int fold_diff(int *diff)
*/
static int refresh_cpu_vm_stats(bool do_pagesets)
{
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat;
struct zone *zone;
int i;
- int global_diff[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
+ int global_zone_diff[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
+ int global_node_diff[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
int changes = 0;
for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
@@ -477,7 +672,7 @@ static int refresh_cpu_vm_stats(bool do_pagesets)
if (v) {
atomic_long_add(v, &zone->vm_stat[i]);
- global_diff[i] += v;
+ global_zone_diff[i] += v;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/* 3 seconds idle till flush */
__this_cpu_write(p->expire, 3);
@@ -516,7 +711,22 @@ static int refresh_cpu_vm_stats(bool do_pagesets)
}
#endif
}
- changes += fold_diff(global_diff);
+
+ for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat __percpu *p = pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS; i++) {
+ int v;
+
+ v = this_cpu_xchg(p->vm_node_stat_diff[i], 0);
+ if (v) {
+ atomic_long_add(v, &pgdat->vm_stat[i]);
+ global_node_diff[i] += v;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ changes += fold_diff(global_zone_diff, global_node_diff);
return changes;
}
@@ -527,9 +737,11 @@ static int refresh_cpu_vm_stats(bool do_pagesets)
*/
void cpu_vm_stats_fold(int cpu)
{
+ struct pglist_data *pgdat;
struct zone *zone;
int i;
- int global_diff[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
+ int global_zone_diff[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
+ int global_node_diff[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS] = { 0, };
for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
struct per_cpu_pageset *p;
@@ -543,11 +755,27 @@ void cpu_vm_stats_fold(int cpu)
v = p->vm_stat_diff[i];
p->vm_stat_diff[i] = 0;
atomic_long_add(v, &zone->vm_stat[i]);
- global_diff[i] += v;
+ global_zone_diff[i] += v;
}
}
- fold_diff(global_diff);
+ for_each_online_pgdat(pgdat) {
+ struct per_cpu_nodestat *p;
+
+ p = per_cpu_ptr(pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats, cpu);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
+ if (p->vm_node_stat_diff[i]) {
+ int v;
+
+ v = p->vm_node_stat_diff[i];
+ p->vm_node_stat_diff[i] = 0;
+ atomic_long_add(v, &pgdat->vm_stat[i]);
+ global_node_diff[i] += v;
+ }
+ }
+
+ fold_diff(global_zone_diff, global_node_diff);
}
/*
@@ -563,16 +791,19 @@ void drain_zonestat(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pageset *pset)
int v = pset->vm_stat_diff[i];
pset->vm_stat_diff[i] = 0;
atomic_long_add(v, &zone->vm_stat[i]);
- atomic_long_add(v, &vm_stat[i]);
+ atomic_long_add(v, &vm_zone_stat[i]);
}
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
- * Determine the per node value of a stat item.
+ * Determine the per node value of a stat item. This function
+ * is called frequently in a NUMA machine, so try to be as
+ * frugal as possible.
*/
-unsigned long node_page_state(int node, enum zone_stat_item item)
+unsigned long sum_zone_node_page_state(int node,
+ enum zone_stat_item item)
{
struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
int i;
@@ -584,6 +815,19 @@ unsigned long node_page_state(int node, enum zone_stat_item item)
return count;
}
+/*
+ * Determine the per node value of a stat item.
+ */
+unsigned long node_page_state(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
+ enum node_stat_item item)
+{
+ long x = atomic_long_read(&pgdat->vm_stat[item]);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ if (x < 0)
+ x = 0;
+#endif
+ return x;
+}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
@@ -1287,6 +1531,7 @@ static void *vmstat_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
if (*pos >= ARRAY_SIZE(vmstat_text))
return NULL;
stat_items_size = NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS * sizeof(unsigned long) +
+ NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS * sizeof(unsigned long) +
NR_VM_WRITEBACK_STAT_ITEMS * sizeof(unsigned long);
#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
@@ -1301,6 +1546,10 @@ static void *vmstat_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
v[i] = global_page_state(i);
v += NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS;
+ for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS; i++)
+ v[i] = global_node_page_state(i);
+ v += NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS;
+
global_dirty_limits(v + NR_DIRTY_BG_THRESHOLD,
v + NR_DIRTY_THRESHOLD);
v += NR_VM_WRITEBACK_STAT_ITEMS;
@@ -1390,7 +1639,7 @@ int vmstat_refresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
if (err)
return err;
for (i = 0; i < NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS; i++) {
- val = atomic_long_read(&vm_stat[i]);
+ val = atomic_long_read(&vm_zone_stat[i]);
if (val < 0) {
switch (i) {
case NR_ALLOC_BATCH: