diff options
| author | Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> | 2023-04-18 16:46:39 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-04-21 14:52:04 -0700 |
| commit | d2658f2052c7db6ec0a79977205f8cf1cb9effc2 (patch) | |
| tree | aa1723db2df992b5dc3bbdbc76d9de79a2ca3091 /mm/zsmalloc.c | |
| parent | 07115fcc15b4aa5c268fb80b82ad15868a82a285 (diff) | |
zsmalloc: allow only one active pool compaction context
zsmalloc pool can be compacted concurrently by many contexts,
e.g.
cc1 handle_mm_fault()
do_anonymous_page()
__alloc_pages_slowpath()
try_to_free_pages()
do_try_to_free_pages(
lru_gen_shrink_node()
shrink_slab()
do_shrink_slab()
zs_shrinker_scan()
zs_compact()
Pool compaction is currently (basically) single-threaded as
it is performed under pool->lock. Having multiple compaction
threads results in unnecessary contention, as each thread
competes for pool->lock. This, in turn, affects all zsmalloc
operations such as zs_malloc(), zs_map_object(), zs_free(), etc.
Introduce the pool->compaction_in_progress atomic variable,
which ensures that only one compaction context can run at a
time. This reduces overall pool->lock contention in (corner)
cases when many contexts attempt to shrink zspool simultaneously.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230418074639.1903197-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Fixes: c0547d0b6a4b ("zsmalloc: consolidate zs_pool's migrate_lock and size_class's locks")
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/zsmalloc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/zsmalloc.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c index cc81dfba05a0..44ddaf5d601e 100644 --- a/mm/zsmalloc.c +++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ struct zs_pool { struct work_struct free_work; #endif spinlock_t lock; + atomic_t compaction_in_progress; }; struct zspage { @@ -2274,6 +2275,15 @@ unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool) struct size_class *class; unsigned long pages_freed = 0; + /* + * Pool compaction is performed under pool->lock so it is basically + * single-threaded. Having more than one thread in __zs_compact() + * will increase pool->lock contention, which will impact other + * zsmalloc operations that need pool->lock. + */ + if (atomic_xchg(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 1)) + return 0; + for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) { class = pool->size_class[i]; if (class->index != i) @@ -2281,6 +2291,7 @@ unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool *pool) pages_freed += __zs_compact(pool, class); } atomic_long_add(pages_freed, &pool->stats.pages_compacted); + atomic_set(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 0); return pages_freed; } @@ -2388,6 +2399,7 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name) init_deferred_free(pool); spin_lock_init(&pool->lock); + atomic_set(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 0); pool->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pool->name) |