diff options
author | Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> | 2025-01-16 12:46:25 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2025-01-17 20:01:09 -0800 |
commit | 6a128cdf1926b20a94d6af7d7d03b76ba19a4f8b (patch) | |
tree | fe6a0f9a31851da46ff95822fd2431fd82c46509 /net/ethtool | |
parent | 19e1e17f50c411f77140dd86d8255c8daa9e2edb (diff) |
net: ethtool: ts: add separate counter for unconfirmed one-step TX timestamps
For packets with two-step timestamp requests, the hardware timestamp
comes back to the driver through a confirmation mechanism of sorts,
which allows the driver to confidently bump the successful "pkts"
counter.
For one-step PTP, the NIC is supposed to autonomously insert its
hardware TX timestamp in the packet headers while simultaneously
transmitting it. There may be a confirmation that this was done
successfully, or there may not.
None of the current drivers which implement ethtool_ops :: get_ts_stats()
also support HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC or HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC, so it
is a bit unclear which model to follow. But there are NICs, such as DSA,
where there is no transmit confirmation at all. Here, it would be wrong /
misleading to increment the successful "pkts" counter, because one-step
PTP packets can be dropped on TX just like any other packets.
So introduce a special counter which signifies "yes, an attempt was made,
but we don't know whether it also exited the port or not". I expect that
for one-step PTP packets where a confirmation is available, the "pkts"
counter would be bumped.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250116104628.123555-2-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ethtool')
-rw-r--r-- | net/ethtool/tsinfo.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ethtool/tsinfo.c b/net/ethtool/tsinfo.c index 7e495a41aeec..691be6c445b3 100644 --- a/net/ethtool/tsinfo.c +++ b/net/ethtool/tsinfo.c @@ -186,6 +186,8 @@ static int tsinfo_put_stats(struct sk_buff *skb, if (tsinfo_put_stat(skb, stats->tx_stats.pkts, ETHTOOL_A_TS_STAT_TX_PKTS) || + tsinfo_put_stat(skb, stats->tx_stats.onestep_pkts_unconfirmed, + ETHTOOL_A_TS_STAT_TX_ONESTEP_PKTS_UNCONFIRMED) || tsinfo_put_stat(skb, stats->tx_stats.lost, ETHTOOL_A_TS_STAT_TX_LOST) || tsinfo_put_stat(skb, stats->tx_stats.err, |