diff options
| author | Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com> | 2017-03-08 22:54:18 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> | 2017-03-13 13:30:28 +0100 |
| commit | 10596608c4d62cb8c1c2b806debcbd32fe657e71 (patch) | |
| tree | 1b78903a75011a45b7b647096b1319aedb475d11 /net/ipv4 | |
| parent | fd89b23a4632d3cbdee398048497e026edadfb71 (diff) | |
netfilter: nf_tables: fix mismatch in big-endian system
Currently, there are two different methods to store an u16 integer to
the u32 data register. For example:
u32 *dest = ®s->data[priv->dreg];
1. *dest = 0; *(u16 *) dest = val_u16;
2. *dest = val_u16;
For method 1, the u16 value will be stored like this, either in
big-endian or little-endian system:
0 15 31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Value | 0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
For method 2, in little-endian system, the u16 value will be the same
as listed above. But in big-endian system, the u16 value will be stored
like this:
0 15 31
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 0 | Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
So later we use "memcmp(®s->data[priv->sreg], data, 2);" to do
compare in nft_cmp, nft_lookup expr ..., method 2 will get the wrong
result in big-endian system, as 0~15 bits will always be zero.
For the similar reason, when loading an u16 value from the u32 data
register, we should use "*(u16 *) sreg;" instead of "(u16)*sreg;",
the 2nd method will get the wrong value in the big-endian system.
So introduce some wrapper functions to store/load an u8 or u16
integer to/from the u32 data register, and use them in the right
place.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv4.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv4.c | 8 |
2 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv4.c index a0ea8aad1bf1..f18677277119 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_masq_ipv4.c @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ static void nft_masq_ipv4_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, memset(&range, 0, sizeof(range)); range.flags = priv->flags; if (priv->sreg_proto_min) { - range.min_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]; - range.max_proto.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]; + range.min_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]); + range.max_proto.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]); } regs->verdict.code = nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4(pkt->skb, nft_hook(pkt), &range, nft_out(pkt)); diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv4.c index 1650ed23c15d..5120be1d3118 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv4.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_redir_ipv4.c @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ static void nft_redir_ipv4_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, memset(&mr, 0, sizeof(mr)); if (priv->sreg_proto_min) { - mr.range[0].min.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]; - mr.range[0].max.all = - *(__be16 *)®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]; + mr.range[0].min.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_min]); + mr.range[0].max.all = (__force __be16)nft_reg_load16( + ®s->data[priv->sreg_proto_max]); mr.range[0].flags |= NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED; } |