diff options
| author | Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-07-18 15:06:16 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-07-19 15:30:22 -0700 |
| commit | 741a49a4dc5fd7e61b37b259dde915083c2c5327 (patch) | |
| tree | 5374b7d0dbfdf53b87904e2660b2c71afc7f2ec5 /net/smc/smc_llc.c | |
| parent | b9979c2e837926c87358024a95c67988477909b1 (diff) | |
net/smc: do not call dma sync for unmapped memory
The dma related ...sync_sg... functions check the link state before the
dma function is actually called. But the check in smc_link_usable()
allows links in ACTIVATING state which are not yet mapped to dma memory.
Under high load it may happen that the sync_sg functions are called for
such a link which results in an debug output like
DMA-API: mlx5_core 0002:00:00.0: device driver tries to sync
DMA memory it has not allocated [device address=0x0000000103370000]
[size=65536 bytes]
To fix that introduce a helper to check for the link state ACTIVE and
use it where appropriate. And move the link state update to ACTIVATING
to the end of smcr_link_init() when most initial setup is done.
Reviewed-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: d854fcbfaeda ("net/smc: add new link state and related helpers")
Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/smc/smc_llc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/smc/smc_llc.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c index fa8cd57a9b32..df5b0a6ea848 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int smc_llc_send_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *send_link, rtok_ix = 1; for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) { link = &send_link->lgr->lnk[i]; - if (link->state == SMC_LNK_ACTIVE && link != send_link) { + if (smc_link_active(link) && link != send_link) { rkeyllc->rtoken[rtok_ix].link_id = link->link_id; rkeyllc->rtoken[rtok_ix].rmb_key = htonl(rmb_desc->mr_rx[link->link_idx]->rkey); @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static int smc_llc_active_link_count(struct smc_link_group *lgr) int i, link_count = 0; for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) { - if (!smc_link_usable(&lgr->lnk[i])) + if (!smc_link_active(&lgr->lnk[i])) continue; link_count++; } @@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_response(struct smc_link *link, switch (llc_type) { case SMC_LLC_TEST_LINK: - if (link->state == SMC_LNK_ACTIVE) + if (smc_link_active(link)) complete(&link->llc_testlink_resp); break; case SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK: @@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ static void smc_llc_testlink_work(struct work_struct *work) u8 user_data[16] = { 0 }; int rc; - if (link->state != SMC_LNK_ACTIVE) + if (!smc_link_active(link)) return; /* don't reschedule worker */ expire_time = link->wr_rx_tstamp + link->llc_testlink_time; if (time_is_after_jiffies(expire_time)) { @@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@ static void smc_llc_testlink_work(struct work_struct *work) /* receive TEST LINK response over RoCE fabric */ rc = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&link->llc_testlink_resp, SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME); - if (link->state != SMC_LNK_ACTIVE) + if (!smc_link_active(link)) return; /* link state changed */ if (rc <= 0) { smcr_link_down_cond_sched(link); |