summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/sunrpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>2023-11-21 11:40:13 -0500
committerChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>2024-01-07 17:54:26 -0500
commitb541dd554bc0442f7ff8c6cab6c5460c044913c8 (patch)
tree83e59092c037fea239bcf6b5a5e8bee49d2f90e0 /net/sunrpc
parent52e89100754b2e888cb63bf2d19e65d809497cd6 (diff)
svcrdma: Eliminate allocation of recv_ctxt objects in backchannel
The svc_rdma_recv_ctxt free list uses a lockless list to avoid the need for a spin lock in the fast path. llist_del_first(), which is used by svc_rdma_recv_ctxt_get(), requires serialization, however, when there are multiple list producers that are unserialized. I mistakenly thought there was only one caller of svc_rdma_recv_ctxt_get() (svc_rdma_refresh_recvs()), thus explicit serialization would not be necessary. But there is another caller: svc_rdma_bc_sendto(), and these two are not serialized against each other. I haven't seen ill effects that I could directly ascribe to a lack of serialization. It's just an observation based on code audit. When DMA-mapping before sending a Reply, the passed-in struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt is used only for its write and reply PCLs. These are currently always empty in the backchannel case. So, instead of passing a full svc_rdma_recv_ctxt object to svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(), let's pass in just the Write and Reply PCLs. This change makes it unnecessary for the backchannel to acquire a dummy svc_rdma_recv_ctxt object when sending an RPC Call. The need for svc_rdma_recv_ctxt free list serialization is now completely avoided. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc')
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c11
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c31
2 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c
index 7420a2c990c7..c9be6778643b 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_backchannel.c
@@ -76,15 +76,12 @@ static int svc_rdma_bc_sendto(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
struct rpc_rqst *rqst,
struct svc_rdma_send_ctxt *sctxt)
{
- struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt;
+ struct svc_rdma_pcl empty_pcl;
int ret;
- rctxt = svc_rdma_recv_ctxt_get(rdma);
- if (!rctxt)
- return -EIO;
-
- ret = svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, rctxt, &rqst->rq_snd_buf);
- svc_rdma_recv_ctxt_put(rdma, rctxt);
+ pcl_init(&empty_pcl);
+ ret = svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, &empty_pcl, &empty_pcl,
+ &rqst->rq_snd_buf);
if (ret < 0)
return -EIO;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
index c6644cca52c5..45735f74eb86 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_sendto.c
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_xb_count_sges(const struct xdr_buf *xdr,
* svc_rdma_pull_up_needed - Determine whether to use pull-up
* @rdma: controlling transport
* @sctxt: send_ctxt for the Send WR
- * @rctxt: Write and Reply chunks provided by client
+ * @write_pcl: Write chunk list provided by client
* @xdr: xdr_buf containing RPC message to transmit
*
* Returns:
@@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_xb_count_sges(const struct xdr_buf *xdr,
*/
static bool svc_rdma_pull_up_needed(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
const struct svc_rdma_send_ctxt *sctxt,
- const struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt,
+ const struct svc_rdma_pcl *write_pcl,
const struct xdr_buf *xdr)
{
/* Resources needed for the transport header */
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static bool svc_rdma_pull_up_needed(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
};
int ret;
- ret = pcl_process_nonpayloads(&rctxt->rc_write_pcl, xdr,
+ ret = pcl_process_nonpayloads(write_pcl, xdr,
svc_rdma_xb_count_sges, &args);
if (ret < 0)
return false;
@@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_xb_linearize(const struct xdr_buf *xdr,
* svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg - Copy Reply into a single buffer
* @rdma: controlling transport
* @sctxt: send_ctxt for the Send WR; xprt hdr is already prepared
- * @rctxt: Write and Reply chunks provided by client
+ * @write_pcl: Write chunk list provided by client
* @xdr: prepared xdr_buf containing RPC message
*
* The device is not capable of sending the reply directly.
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_xb_linearize(const struct xdr_buf *xdr,
*/
static int svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
struct svc_rdma_send_ctxt *sctxt,
- const struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt,
+ const struct svc_rdma_pcl *write_pcl,
const struct xdr_buf *xdr)
{
struct svc_rdma_pullup_data args = {
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ static int svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
};
int ret;
- ret = pcl_process_nonpayloads(&rctxt->rc_write_pcl, xdr,
+ ret = pcl_process_nonpayloads(write_pcl, xdr,
svc_rdma_xb_linearize, &args);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
@@ -764,7 +764,8 @@ static int svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
/* svc_rdma_map_reply_msg - DMA map the buffer holding RPC message
* @rdma: controlling transport
* @sctxt: send_ctxt for the Send WR
- * @rctxt: Write and Reply chunks provided by client
+ * @write_pcl: Write chunk list provided by client
+ * @reply_pcl: Reply chunk provided by client
* @xdr: prepared xdr_buf containing RPC message
*
* Returns:
@@ -776,7 +777,8 @@ static int svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(const struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
*/
int svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
struct svc_rdma_send_ctxt *sctxt,
- const struct svc_rdma_recv_ctxt *rctxt,
+ const struct svc_rdma_pcl *write_pcl,
+ const struct svc_rdma_pcl *reply_pcl,
const struct xdr_buf *xdr)
{
struct svc_rdma_map_data args = {
@@ -789,18 +791,18 @@ int svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
sctxt->sc_sges[0].length = sctxt->sc_hdrbuf.len;
/* If there is a Reply chunk, nothing follows the transport
- * header, and we're done here.
+ * header, so there is nothing to map.
*/
- if (!pcl_is_empty(&rctxt->rc_reply_pcl))
+ if (!pcl_is_empty(reply_pcl))
return 0;
/* For pull-up, svc_rdma_send() will sync the transport header.
* No additional DMA mapping is necessary.
*/
- if (svc_rdma_pull_up_needed(rdma, sctxt, rctxt, xdr))
- return svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, rctxt, xdr);
+ if (svc_rdma_pull_up_needed(rdma, sctxt, write_pcl, xdr))
+ return svc_rdma_pull_up_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, write_pcl, xdr);
- return pcl_process_nonpayloads(&rctxt->rc_write_pcl, xdr,
+ return pcl_process_nonpayloads(write_pcl, xdr,
svc_rdma_xb_dma_map, &args);
}
@@ -848,7 +850,8 @@ static int svc_rdma_send_reply_msg(struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma,
{
int ret;
- ret = svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, rctxt, &rqstp->rq_res);
+ ret = svc_rdma_map_reply_msg(rdma, sctxt, &rctxt->rc_write_pcl,
+ &rctxt->rc_reply_pcl, &rqstp->rq_res);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;