diff options
| author | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2023-10-11 09:20:55 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2023-10-13 16:49:32 -0700 |
| commit | 419ce133ab928ab5efd7b50b2ef36ddfd4eadbd2 (patch) | |
| tree | 8d934593e6eaf8f7ded2c7c32e8bd0db8effccd9 /net/tls/tls_main.c | |
| parent | 242e34500a32631f85c2b4eb6cb42a368a39e54f (diff) | |
tcp: allow again tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting
As reported by Tom, .NET and applications build on top of it rely
on connect(AF_UNSPEC) to async cancel pending I/O operations on TCP
socket.
The blamed commit below caused a regression, as such cancellation
can now fail.
As suggested by Eric, this change addresses the problem explicitly
causing blocking I/O operation to terminate immediately (with an error)
when a concurrent disconnect() is executed.
Instead of tracking the number of threads blocked on a given socket,
track the number of disconnect() issued on such socket. If such counter
changes after a blocking operation releasing and re-acquiring the socket
lock, error out the current operation.
Fixes: 4faeee0cf8a5 ("tcp: deny tcp_disconnect() when threads are waiting")
Reported-by: Tom Deseyn <tdeseyn@redhat.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886305
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f3b95e47e3dbed840960548aebaa8d954372db41.1697008693.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/tls/tls_main.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/tls/tls_main.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c index 02f583ff9239..002483e60c19 100644 --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ void update_sk_prot(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx) int wait_on_pending_writer(struct sock *sk, long *timeo) { - int rc = 0; DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function); + int ret, rc = 0; add_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); while (1) { @@ -154,9 +154,13 @@ int wait_on_pending_writer(struct sock *sk, long *timeo) break; } - if (sk_wait_event(sk, timeo, - !READ_ONCE(sk->sk_write_pending), &wait)) + ret = sk_wait_event(sk, timeo, + !READ_ONCE(sk->sk_write_pending), &wait); + if (ret) { + if (ret < 0) + rc = ret; break; + } } remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); return rc; |