diff options
| author | Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> | 2020-06-22 16:40:29 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> | 2020-06-24 09:13:13 +0200 |
| commit | 4f47e8ab6ab796b5380f74866fa5287aca4dcc58 (patch) | |
| tree | af80bc6678344ec8fd3592d566ac66c268923faf /net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | |
| parent | 0275875530f692c725c6f993aced2eca2d6ac50c (diff) | |
xfrm: policy: match with both mark and mask on user interfaces
In commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
it would take 'priority' to make a policy unique, and allow duplicated
policies with different 'priority' to be added, which is not expected
by userland, as Tobias reported in strongswan.
To fix this duplicated policies issue, and also fix the issue in
commit ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list"),
when doing add/del/get/update on user interfaces, this patch is to change
to look up a policy with both mark and mask by doing:
mark.v == pol->mark.v && mark.m == pol->mark.m
and leave the check:
(mark & pol->mark.m) == pol->mark.v
for tx/rx path only.
As the userland expects an exact mark and mask match to manage policies.
v1->v2:
- make xfrm_policy_mark_match inline and fix the changelog as
Tobias suggested.
Fixes: 295fae568885 ("xfrm: Allow user space manipulation of SPD mark")
Fixes: ed17b8d377ea ("xfrm: fix a warning in xfrm_policy_insert_list")
Reported-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Tested-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index e6cfaa680ef3..fbb7d9d06478 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -1863,7 +1863,6 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, struct km_event c; int delete; struct xfrm_mark m; - u32 mark = xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &m); u32 if_id = 0; p = nlmsg_data(nlh); @@ -1880,8 +1879,11 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]) if_id = nla_get_u32(attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]); + xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &m); + if (p->index) - xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, mark, if_id, type, p->dir, p->index, delete, &err); + xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, &m, if_id, type, p->dir, + p->index, delete, &err); else { struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]; struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx; @@ -1898,8 +1900,8 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (err) return err; } - xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, mark, if_id, type, p->dir, &p->sel, - ctx, delete, &err); + xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, &m, if_id, type, p->dir, + &p->sel, ctx, delete, &err); security_xfrm_policy_free(ctx); } if (xp == NULL) @@ -2166,7 +2168,6 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u8 type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN; int err = -ENOENT; struct xfrm_mark m; - u32 mark = xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &m); u32 if_id = 0; err = copy_from_user_policy_type(&type, attrs); @@ -2180,8 +2181,11 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]) if_id = nla_get_u32(attrs[XFRMA_IF_ID]); + xfrm_mark_get(attrs, &m); + if (p->index) - xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, mark, if_id, type, p->dir, p->index, 0, &err); + xp = xfrm_policy_byid(net, &m, if_id, type, p->dir, p->index, + 0, &err); else { struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]; struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx; @@ -2198,7 +2202,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, if (err) return err; } - xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, mark, if_id, type, p->dir, + xp = xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(net, &m, if_id, type, p->dir, &p->sel, ctx, 0, &err); security_xfrm_policy_free(ctx); } |