rust: bindgen: upgrade to 0.65.1

In LLVM 16, anonymous items may return names like `(unnamed union at ..)`
rather than empty names [1], which breaks Rust-enabled builds because
bindgen assumed an empty name instead of detecting them via
`clang_Cursor_isAnonymous` [2]:

    $ make rustdoc LLVM=1 CLIPPY=1 -j$(nproc)
      RUSTC L rust/core.o
      BINDGEN rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs
      BINDGEN rust/bindings/bindings_helpers_generated.rs
      BINDGEN rust/uapi/uapi_generated.rs
    thread 'main' panicked at '"ftrace_branch_data_union_(anonymous_at__/_/include/linux/compiler_types_h_146_2)" is not a valid Ident', .../proc-macro2-1.0.24/src/fallback.rs:693:9
    ...
    thread 'main' panicked at '"ftrace_branch_data_union_(anonymous_at__/_/include/linux/compiler_types_h_146_2)" is not a valid Ident', .../proc-macro2-1.0.24/src/fallback.rs:693:9
    ...

This was fixed in bindgen 0.62.0. Therefore, upgrade bindgen to
a more recent version, 0.65.1, to support LLVM 16.

Since bindgen 0.58.0 changed the `--{white,black}list-*` flags to
`--{allow,block}list-*` [3], update them on our side too.

In addition, bindgen 0.61.0 moved its CLI utility into a binary crate
called `bindgen-cli` [4]. Thus update the installation command in the
Quick Start guide.

Moreover, bindgen 0.61.0 changed the default functionality to bind
`size_t` to `usize` [5] and added the `--no-size_t-is-usize` flag
to not bind `size_t` as `usize`. Then bindgen 0.65.0 removed
the `--size_t-is-usize` flag [6]. Thus stop passing the flag to bindgen.

Finally, bindgen 0.61.0 added support for the `noreturn` attribute (in
its different forms) [7]. Thus remove the infinite loop in our Rust
panic handler after calling `BUG()`, since bindgen now correctly
generates a `BUG()` binding that returns `!` instead of `()`.

Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/19e984ef8f49bc3ccced15621989fa9703b2cd5b [1]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/pull/2319 [2]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/pull/1990 [3]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/pull/2284 [4]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/commit/cc78b6fdb6e829e5fb8fa1639f2182cb49333569 [5]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/pull/2408 [6]
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-bindgen/issues/2094 [7]
Signed-off-by: Aakash Sen Sharma <aakashsensharma@gmail.com>
Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1013
Tested-by: Ariel Miculas <amiculas@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612194311.24826-1-aakashsensharma@gmail.com
[ Reworded commit message. Mentioned the `bindgen-cli` binary crate
  change, linked to it and updated the Quick Start guide. Re-added a
  deleted "as" word in a code comment and reflowed comment to respect
  the maximum length. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/rust/helpers.c b/rust/helpers.c
index f946f2ea640a..ebd69490127b 100644
--- a/rust/helpers.c
+++ b/rust/helpers.c
@@ -138,19 +138,18 @@ void rust_helper_put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rust_helper_put_task_struct);
 
 /*
- * We use `bindgen`'s `--size_t-is-usize` option to bind the C `size_t` type
- * as the Rust `usize` type, so we can use it in contexts where Rust
- * expects a `usize` like slice (array) indices. `usize` is defined to be
- * the same as C's `uintptr_t` type (can hold any pointer) but not
- * necessarily the same as `size_t` (can hold the size of any single
- * object). Most modern platforms use the same concrete integer type for
+ * `bindgen` binds the C `size_t` type as the Rust `usize` type, so we can
+ * use it in contexts where Rust expects a `usize` like slice (array) indices.
+ * `usize` is defined to be the same as C's `uintptr_t` type (can hold any
+ * pointer) but not necessarily the same as `size_t` (can hold the size of any
+ * single object). Most modern platforms use the same concrete integer type for
  * both of them, but in case we find ourselves on a platform where
  * that's not true, fail early instead of risking ABI or
  * integer-overflow issues.
  *
  * If your platform fails this assertion, it means that you are in
- * danger of integer-overflow bugs (even if you attempt to remove
- * `--size_t-is-usize`). It may be easiest to change the kernel ABI on
+ * danger of integer-overflow bugs (even if you attempt to add
+ * `--no-size_t-is-usize`). It may be easiest to change the kernel ABI on
  * your platform such that `size_t` matches `uintptr_t` (i.e., to increase
  * `size_t`, because `uintptr_t` has to be at least as big as `size_t`).
  */