diff options
| author | David Gow <davidgow@google.com> | 2020-03-23 19:43:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> | 2020-03-25 12:13:16 -0600 |
| commit | 97752c39bdaeea990260d3111250f6c861519808 (patch) | |
| tree | b34d435bc112185ebb8717194d9f99015d313ce2 /tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | |
| parent | 2d68df6cc4bf5822d78cd0f067174d6e29a2f739 (diff) | |
kunit: kunit_tool: Allow .kunitconfig to disable config items
Rework kunit_tool in order to allow .kunitconfig files to better enforce
that disabled items in .kunitconfig are disabled in the generated
.config.
Previously, kunit_tool simply enforced that any line present in
.kunitconfig was also present in .config, but this could cause problems
if a config option was disabled in .kunitconfig, but not listed in .config
due to (for example) having disabled dependencies.
To fix this, re-work the parser to track config names and values, and
require values to match unless they are explicitly disabled with the
"CONFIG_x is not set" comment (or by setting its value to 'n'). Those
"disabled" values will pass validation if omitted from the .config, but
not if they have a different value.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py')
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index ce47e87b633a..984588d6ba95 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) kconfig1 = kunit_config.Kconfig() - kconfig1.add_entry(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_TEST=y')) + kconfig1.add_entry(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) self.assertTrue(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertFalse(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) @@ -51,15 +51,15 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_UML=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_MMU=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_TEST=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_EXAMPLE_TEST=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('# CONFIG_MK8 is not set')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) self.assertEqual(kconfig.entries(), expected_kconfig.entries()) @@ -68,15 +68,15 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_UML=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_MMU=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_TEST=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('CONFIG_EXAMPLE_TEST=y')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('# CONFIG_MK8 is not set')) + kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) expected_kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) |