summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>2022-09-01 22:22:53 +0000
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2022-09-02 15:55:37 +0200
commitafef88e65554c3e8691513b8350d6445e292560e (patch)
tree80e6d69ba0cba3905f3a451366de180cf90bfaf5 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
parentfe2ad08e1e1df77b6941916b87d4871d751b88b6 (diff)
selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with .bpf.o extension
BPF object files are, in a way, the final artifact produced as part of the ahead-of-time compilation process. That makes them somewhat special compared to "regular" object files, which are a intermediate build artifacts that can typically be removed safely. As such, it can make sense to name them differently to make it easier to spot this difference at a glance. Among others, libbpf-bootstrap [0] has established the extension .bpf.o for BPF object files. It seems reasonable to follow this example and establish the same denomination for selftest build artifacts. To that end, this change adjusts the corresponding part of the build system and the test programs loading BPF object files to work with .bpf.o files. [0] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220901222253.1199242-1-deso@posteo.net
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c36
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index 19c70880cfb3..58fe2c586ed7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_1(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
- &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall1.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+ &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_2(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
- &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall2.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+ &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ out:
*/
static void test_tailcall_3(void)
{
- test_tailcall_count("tailcall3.o");
+ test_tailcall_count("tailcall3.bpf.o");
}
/* test_tailcall_6 checks that the count value of the tail call limit
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ static void test_tailcall_3(void)
*/
static void test_tailcall_6(void)
{
- test_tailcall_count("tailcall6.o");
+ test_tailcall_count("tailcall6.bpf.o");
}
/* test_tailcall_4 checks that the kernel properly selects indirect jump
@@ -329,8 +329,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_4(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall4.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
- &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall4.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+ &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_5(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall5.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
- &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall5.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj,
+ &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -507,8 +507,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_1(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- &obj, &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf1.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ &obj, &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_2(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- &obj, &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf2.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ &obj, &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -671,8 +671,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_3(void)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf3.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- &obj, &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf3.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ &obj, &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;
@@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise)
.repeat = 1,
);
- err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf4.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- &obj, &prog_fd);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_load("tailcall_bpf2bpf4.bpf.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ &obj, &prog_fd);
if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
return;