selftests/bpf: Fix map tests errno checks

Switching to libbpf 1.0 API broke test_lpm_map and test_lru_map as error
reporting changed. Instead of setting errno and returning -1 bpf calls
now return -Exxx directly.
Drop errno checks and look at return code directly.

Fixes: b858ba8c52b6 ("selftests/bpf: Use libbpf 1.0 API mode instead of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK")
Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220421094320.1563570-1-asavkov@redhat.com

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 26 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index 789c9748d241..c028d621c744 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -408,16 +408,13 @@ static void test_lpm_ipaddr(void)
 
 	/* Test some lookups that should not match any entry */
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key_ipv4->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "11.11.11.11", key_ipv4->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv4, key_ipv4, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
 	inet_pton(AF_INET6, "2a00:ffff::", key_ipv6->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd_ipv6, key_ipv6, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
 	close(map_fd_ipv4);
 	close(map_fd_ipv6);
@@ -474,18 +471,15 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
 	/* remove non-existent node */
 	key->prefixlen = 32;
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "10.0.0.1", key->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 &&
-		errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
 	key->prefixlen = 30; // unused prefix so far
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&
-		errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT);
 
 	key->prefixlen = 16; // same prefix as the root node
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.255.0.0", key->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 &&
-		errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* assert initial lookup */
 	key->prefixlen = 32;
@@ -530,8 +524,7 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
 
 	key->prefixlen = 32;
 	inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.1", key->data);
-	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -1 &&
-		errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &value) == -ENOENT);
 
 	close(map_fd);
 }
@@ -552,8 +545,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	assert(map_fd >= 0);
 
 	/* empty tree. get_next_key should return ENOENT */
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* get and verify the first key, get the second one should fail. */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 16;
@@ -565,8 +557,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
 	       key_p->data[1] == 168);
 
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* no exact matching key should get the first one in post order. */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 8;
@@ -590,8 +581,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	       next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
 
 	memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* Add one more element (total three) */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 24;
@@ -614,8 +604,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	       next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
 
 	memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* Add one more element (total four) */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 24;
@@ -643,8 +632,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	       next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
 
 	memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* Add one more element (total five) */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 28;
@@ -678,8 +666,7 @@ static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
 	       next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
 
 	memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
-	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
-	       errno == ENOENT);
+	assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -ENOENT);
 
 	/* no exact matching key should return the first one in post order */
 	key_p->prefixlen = 22;