diff options
| author | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-08-05 16:07:34 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-08-06 17:18:33 +0200 |
| commit | 579345e7f2190c1ee97f44154526dcd458ea790d (patch) | |
| tree | 642bee0776fc5e8743333b7a5c11e7b044d343fb /tools/testing | |
| parent | 277b134057036df8c657079ca92c3e5e7d10aeaf (diff) | |
selftests/bpf: Rename reference_tracking BPF programs
BPF programs for reference_tracking selftest use "fail_" prefix to notify that
they are expected to fail. This is really confusing and inconvenient when
trying to grep through test_progs output to find *actually* failed tests. So
rename the prefix from "fail_" to "err_".
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210805230734.437914-1-andrii@kernel.org
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c | 14 |
2 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c index de2688166696..4e91f4d6466c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/reference_tracking.c @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ void test_reference_tracking(void) if (!test__start_subtest(title)) continue; - /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'fail' */ - if (strstr(title, "fail") != NULL) { + /* Expect verifier failure if test name has 'err' */ + if (strstr(title, "err_") != NULL) { libbpf_print_fn_t old_print_fn; old_print_fn = libbpf_set_print(NULL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c index e83d0b48d80c..8249075f088f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sk_lookup_kern.c @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test1(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_use_after_free") +SEC("classifier/err_use_after_free") int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_uaf(struct __sk_buff *skb) return family; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") +SEC("classifier/err_modify_sk_or_null_pointer") int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_modptr_or_null(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release") int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test2(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_twice") +SEC("classifier/err_release_twice") int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ int bpf_sk_lookup_test3(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } -SEC("classifier/fail_release_unchecked") +SEC("classifier/err_release_unchecked") int bpf_sk_lookup_test4(struct __sk_buff *skb) { struct bpf_sock_tuple tuple = {}; @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void lookup_no_release(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(skb, &tuple, sizeof(tuple), BPF_F_CURRENT_NETNS, 0); } -SEC("classifier/fail_no_release_subcall") +SEC("classifier/err_no_release_subcall") int bpf_sk_lookup_test5(struct __sk_buff *skb) { lookup_no_release(skb); |