summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>2019-04-24 21:51:26 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2019-04-25 17:20:06 -0700
commit6dd7f14080473b655c247863e61b7c34424f0c83 (patch)
tree4ab4ef6b132c7066ef4f4df74211707caf0b324b /tools
parentc6a9efa1d8353d8960d152e7d469d952b01495c0 (diff)
selftests/bpf: test cases for pkt/null checks in subprogs
The first test case, for pointer null checks, is equivalent to the following pseudo-code. It checks that the verifier does not complain on line 6 and recognizes that ptr isn't null. 1: ptr = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key); 2: ret = subprog(ptr) { 3: return ptr != NULL; 4: } 5: if (ret) 6: value = *ptr; The second test case, for packet bound checks, is equivalent to the following pseudo-code. It checks that the verifier does not complain on line 7 and recognizes that the packet is at least 1 byte long. 1: pkt_end = ctx.pkt_end; 2: ptr = ctx.pkt + 8; 3: ret = subprog(ptr, pkt_end) { 4: return ptr <= pkt_end; 5: } 6: if (ret) 7: value = *(u8 *)ctx.pkt; Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c25
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c22
2 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index fb11240b758b..9093a8f64dc6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -375,6 +375,31 @@
.flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
+ "calls: ptr null check in subprog",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 3),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
+ .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 },
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+},
+{
"calls: two calls with args",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 1),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
index e3fc22e672c2..d5c596fdc4b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
@@ -631,3 +631,25 @@
.errstr = "invalid access to packet",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
+{
+ "direct packet access: test29 (reg > pkt_end in subprog)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 4),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+},