diff options
| author | Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> | 2021-12-16 11:16:30 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-12-16 21:41:18 +0100 |
| commit | c2fcbf81c332b42382a0c439bfe2414a241e4f5b (patch) | |
| tree | 0810ba5f24d11030ad0583c2618673ca0aa90b80 /tools | |
| parent | 7edc3fcbf9a2b2e3df53c9656a9f85bf807affac (diff) | |
bpf, selftests: Fix racing issue in btf_skc_cls_ingress test
The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress:
test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0
bpf prog error at line 97
"error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket
when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing
the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0".
The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went
ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had
a chance to process the final ack.
The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for
the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing
everything.
Fixes: 9a856cae2217 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c index 762f6a9da8b5..664ffc0364f4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_skc_cls_ingress.c @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void print_err_line(void) static void test_conn(void) { - int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, err; + int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); int srv_port; @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ static void test_conn(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1)) goto done; + srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL); + if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port || skel->bss->req_sk_sport != srv_port, "Unexpected sk src port", @@ -134,11 +138,13 @@ done: close(listen_fd); if (cli_fd != -1) close(cli_fd); + if (srv_fd != -1) + close(srv_fd); } static void test_syncookie(void) { - int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, err; + int listen_fd = -1, cli_fd = -1, srv_fd = -1, err; socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(srv_sa6); int srv_port; @@ -161,6 +167,10 @@ static void test_syncookie(void) if (CHECK_FAIL(cli_fd == -1)) goto done; + srv_fd = accept(listen_fd, NULL, NULL); + if (CHECK_FAIL(srv_fd == -1)) + goto done; + if (CHECK(skel->bss->listen_tp_sport != srv_port, "Unexpected tp src port", "listen_tp_sport:%u expected:%u\n", @@ -188,6 +198,8 @@ done: close(listen_fd); if (cli_fd != -1) close(cli_fd); + if (srv_fd != -1) + close(srv_fd); } struct test { |