summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/virt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>2019-02-15 12:48:38 -0800
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2019-03-28 17:27:04 +0100
commit5e124900c6ebf5dfbe31b7b67073a64b2da14967 (patch)
tree602bb87c5f07216a32d20c4882ffb5165e66e354 /virt
parent47c42e6b4192a2ac8b6c9858ebcf400a9eff7a10 (diff)
KVM: doc: Fix incorrect word ordering regarding supported use of APIs
Per Paolo[1], instantiating multiple VMs in a single process is legal; but this conflicts with KVM's API documentation, which states: The only supported use is one virtual machine per process, and one vcpu per thread. However, an earlier section in the documentation states: Only run VM ioctls from the same process (address space) that was used to create the VM. and: Only run vcpu ioctls from the same thread that was used to create the vcpu. This suggests that the conflicting documentation is simply an incorrect ordering of of words, i.e. what's really meant is that a virtual machine can't be shared across multiple processes and a vCPU can't be shared across multiple threads. Tweak the blurb on issuing ioctls to use a more assertive tone, and rewrite the "supported use" sentence to reference said blurb instead of poorly restating it in different terms. Opportunistically add missing punctuation. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f23265d4-528e-3bd4-011f-4d7b8f3281db@redhat.com Fixes: 9c1b96e34717 ("KVM: Document basic API") Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> [Improve notes on asynchronous ioctl] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions