diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | net/dsa/port.c | 172 |
1 files changed, 167 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c index bd0cb38a63f6..7afc35db0c29 100644 --- a/net/dsa/port.c +++ b/net/dsa/port.c @@ -1653,22 +1653,184 @@ err_phy_connect: return err; } +/* During the initial DSA driver migration to OF, port nodes were sometimes + * added to device trees with no indication of how they should operate from a + * link management perspective (phy-handle, fixed-link, etc). Additionally, the + * phy-mode may be absent. The interpretation of these port OF nodes depends on + * their type. + * + * User ports with no phy-handle or fixed-link are expected to connect to an + * internal PHY located on the ds->slave_mii_bus at an MDIO address equal to + * the port number. This description is still actively supported. + * + * Shared (CPU and DSA) ports with no phy-handle or fixed-link are expected to + * operate at the maximum speed that their phy-mode is capable of. If the + * phy-mode is absent, they are expected to operate using the phy-mode + * supported by the port that gives the highest link speed. It is unspecified + * if the port should use flow control or not, half duplex or full duplex, or + * if the phy-mode is a SERDES link, whether in-band autoneg is expected to be + * enabled or not. + * + * In the latter case of shared ports, omitting the link management description + * from the firmware node is deprecated and strongly discouraged. DSA uses + * phylink, which rejects the firmware nodes of these ports for lacking + * required properties. + * + * For switches in this table, DSA will skip enforcing validation and will + * later omit registering a phylink instance for the shared ports, if they lack + * a fixed-link, a phy-handle, or a managed = "in-band-status" property. + * It becomes the responsibility of the driver to ensure that these ports + * operate at the maximum speed (whatever this means) and will interoperate + * with the DSA master or other cascade port, since phylink methods will not be + * invoked for them. + * + * If you are considering expanding this table for newly introduced switches, + * think again. It is OK to remove switches from this table if there aren't DT + * blobs in circulation which rely on defaulting the shared ports. + */ +static const char * const dsa_switches_apply_workarounds[] = { +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_XRS700X) + "arrow,xrs7003e", + "arrow,xrs7003f", + "arrow,xrs7004e", + "arrow,xrs7004f", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_B53) + "brcm,bcm5325", + "brcm,bcm53115", + "brcm,bcm53125", + "brcm,bcm53128", + "brcm,bcm5365", + "brcm,bcm5389", + "brcm,bcm5395", + "brcm,bcm5397", + "brcm,bcm5398", + "brcm,bcm53010-srab", + "brcm,bcm53011-srab", + "brcm,bcm53012-srab", + "brcm,bcm53018-srab", + "brcm,bcm53019-srab", + "brcm,bcm5301x-srab", + "brcm,bcm11360-srab", + "brcm,bcm58522-srab", + "brcm,bcm58525-srab", + "brcm,bcm58535-srab", + "brcm,bcm58622-srab", + "brcm,bcm58623-srab", + "brcm,bcm58625-srab", + "brcm,bcm88312-srab", + "brcm,cygnus-srab", + "brcm,nsp-srab", + "brcm,omega-srab", + "brcm,bcm3384-switch", + "brcm,bcm6328-switch", + "brcm,bcm6368-switch", + "brcm,bcm63xx-switch", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_BCM_SF2) + "brcm,bcm7445-switch-v4.0", + "brcm,bcm7278-switch-v4.0", + "brcm,bcm7278-switch-v4.8", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_LANTIQ_GSWIP) + "lantiq,xrx200-gswip", + "lantiq,xrx300-gswip", + "lantiq,xrx330-gswip", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6060) + "marvell,mv88e6060", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_MV88E6XXX) + "marvell,mv88e6085", + "marvell,mv88e6190", + "marvell,mv88e6250", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_MICROCHIP_KSZ_COMMON) + "microchip,ksz8765", + "microchip,ksz8794", + "microchip,ksz8795", + "microchip,ksz8863", + "microchip,ksz8873", + "microchip,ksz9477", + "microchip,ksz9897", + "microchip,ksz9893", + "microchip,ksz9563", + "microchip,ksz8563", + "microchip,ksz9567", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_SMSC_LAN9303_MDIO) + "smsc,lan9303-mdio", +#endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_SMSC_LAN9303_I2C) + "smsc,lan9303-i2c", +#endif + NULL, +}; + +static void dsa_shared_port_validate_of(struct dsa_port *dp, + bool *missing_phy_mode, + bool *missing_link_description) +{ + struct device_node *dn = dp->dn, *phy_np; + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds; + phy_interface_t mode; + + *missing_phy_mode = false; + *missing_link_description = false; + + if (of_get_phy_mode(dn, &mode)) { + *missing_phy_mode = true; + dev_err(ds->dev, + "OF node %pOF of %s port %d lacks the required \"phy-mode\" property\n", + dn, dsa_port_is_cpu(dp) ? "CPU" : "DSA", dp->index); + } + + /* Note: of_phy_is_fixed_link() also returns true for + * managed = "in-band-status" + */ + if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(dn)) + return; + + phy_np = of_parse_phandle(dn, "phy-handle", 0); + if (phy_np) { + of_node_put(phy_np); + return; + } + + *missing_link_description = true; + + dev_err(ds->dev, + "OF node %pOF of %s port %d lacks the required \"phy-handle\", \"fixed-link\" or \"managed\" properties\n", + dn, dsa_port_is_cpu(dp) ? "CPU" : "DSA", dp->index); +} + int dsa_shared_port_link_register_of(struct dsa_port *dp) { struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds; - struct device_node *phy_np; + bool missing_link_description; + bool missing_phy_mode; int port = dp->index; + dsa_shared_port_validate_of(dp, &missing_phy_mode, + &missing_link_description); + + if ((missing_phy_mode || missing_link_description) && + !of_device_compatible_match(ds->dev->of_node, + dsa_switches_apply_workarounds)) + return -EINVAL; + if (!ds->ops->adjust_link) { - phy_np = of_parse_phandle(dp->dn, "phy-handle", 0); - if (of_phy_is_fixed_link(dp->dn) || phy_np) { + if (missing_link_description) { + dev_warn(ds->dev, + "Skipping phylink registration for %s port %d\n", + dsa_port_is_cpu(dp) ? "CPU" : "DSA", dp->index); + } else { if (ds->ops->phylink_mac_link_down) ds->ops->phylink_mac_link_down(ds, port, MLO_AN_FIXED, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA); - of_node_put(phy_np); + return dsa_shared_port_phylink_register(dp); } - of_node_put(phy_np); return 0; } |