summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--include/linux/bpf.h1
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c32
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c39
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c151
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c14
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c25
6 files changed, 247 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 7671530d6e4e..e30100597d0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1449,6 +1449,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
bool dev_bound; /* Program is bound to the netdev. */
bool offload_requested; /* Program is bound and offloaded to the netdev. */
bool attach_btf_trace; /* true if attaching to BTF-enabled raw tp */
+ bool attach_tracing_prog; /* true if tracing another tracing program */
bool func_proto_unreliable;
bool sleepable;
bool tail_call_reachable;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 1bf9805ee185..a1f18681721c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2738,6 +2738,22 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
goto free_prog_sec;
}
+ /*
+ * Bookkeeping for managing the program attachment chain.
+ *
+ * It might be tempting to set attach_tracing_prog flag at the attachment
+ * time, but this will not prevent from loading bunch of tracing prog
+ * first, then attach them one to another.
+ *
+ * The flag attach_tracing_prog is set for the whole program lifecycle, and
+ * doesn't have to be cleared in bpf_tracing_link_release, since tracing
+ * programs cannot change attachment target.
+ */
+ if (type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && dst_prog &&
+ dst_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
+ prog->aux->attach_tracing_prog = true;
+ }
+
/* find program type: socket_filter vs tracing_filter */
err = find_prog_type(type, prog);
if (err < 0)
@@ -3171,7 +3187,12 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
}
if (tgt_prog_fd) {
- /* For now we only allow new targets for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT */
+ /*
+ * For now we only allow new targets for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT. If this
+ * part would be changed to implement the same for
+ * BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, do not forget to update the way how
+ * attach_tracing_prog flag is set.
+ */
if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_put_prog;
@@ -3216,6 +3237,10 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
*
* - if prog->aux->dst_trampoline and tgt_prog is NULL, the program
* was detached and is going for re-attachment.
+ *
+ * - if prog->aux->dst_trampoline is NULL and tgt_prog and prog->aux->attach_btf
+ * are NULL, then program was already attached and user did not provide
+ * tgt_prog_fd so we have no way to find out or create trampoline
*/
if (!prog->aux->dst_trampoline && !tgt_prog) {
/*
@@ -3229,6 +3254,11 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
+ /* We can allow re-attach only if we have valid attach_btf. */
+ if (!prog->aux->attach_btf) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(NULL, prog->aux->attach_btf, btf_id);
}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d5f4ff1eb235..adbf330d364b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20317,6 +20317,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info)
{
bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
+ bool prog_tracing = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING;
const char prefix[] = "btf_trace_";
int ret = 0, subprog = -1, i;
const struct btf_type *t;
@@ -20387,10 +20388,21 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
bpf_log(log, "Can attach to only JITed progs\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (tgt_prog->type == prog->type) {
- /* Cannot fentry/fexit another fentry/fexit program.
- * Cannot attach program extension to another extension.
- * It's ok to attach fentry/fexit to extension program.
+ if (prog_tracing) {
+ if (aux->attach_tracing_prog) {
+ /*
+ * Target program is an fentry/fexit which is already attached
+ * to another tracing program. More levels of nesting
+ * attachment are not allowed.
+ */
+ bpf_log(log, "Cannot nest tracing program attach more than once\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ } else if (tgt_prog->type == prog->type) {
+ /*
+ * To avoid potential call chain cycles, prevent attaching of a
+ * program extension to another extension. It's ok to attach
+ * fentry/fexit to extension program.
*/
bpf_log(log, "Cannot recursively attach\n");
return -EINVAL;
@@ -20403,16 +20415,15 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
* except fentry/fexit. The reason is the following.
* The fentry/fexit programs are used for performance
* analysis, stats and can be attached to any program
- * type except themselves. When extension program is
- * replacing XDP function it is necessary to allow
- * performance analysis of all functions. Both original
- * XDP program and its program extension. Hence
- * attaching fentry/fexit to BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT is
- * allowed. If extending of fentry/fexit was allowed it
- * would be possible to create long call chain
- * fentry->extension->fentry->extension beyond
- * reasonable stack size. Hence extending fentry is not
- * allowed.
+ * type. When extension program is replacing XDP function
+ * it is necessary to allow performance analysis of all
+ * functions. Both original XDP program and its program
+ * extension. Hence attaching fentry/fexit to
+ * BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT is allowed. If extending of
+ * fentry/fexit was allowed it would be possible to create
+ * long call chain fentry->extension->fentry->extension
+ * beyond reasonable stack size. Hence extending fentry
+ * is not allowed.
*/
bpf_log(log, "Cannot extend fentry/fexit\n");
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8100509e561b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursive_attach.c
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include "fentry_recursive.skel.h"
+#include "fentry_recursive_target.skel.h"
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
+
+/* Test recursive attachment of tracing progs with more than one nesting level
+ * is not possible. Create a chain of attachment, verify that the last prog
+ * will fail. Depending on the arguments, following cases are tested:
+ *
+ * - Recursive loading of tracing progs, without attaching (attach = false,
+ * detach = false). The chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ *
+ * - Recursive attach of tracing progs (attach = true, detach = false). The
+ * chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * attach fentry1 -> target
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ *
+ * - Recursive attach and detach of tracing progs (attach = true, detach =
+ * true). This validates that attach_tracing_prog flag will be set throughout
+ * the whole lifecycle of an fentry prog, independently from whether it's
+ * detached. The chain looks like this:
+ * load target
+ * load fentry1 -> target
+ * attach fentry1 -> target
+ * detach fentry1
+ * load fentry2 -> fentry1 (fail)
+ */
+static void test_recursive_fentry_chain(bool attach, bool detach)
+{
+ struct fentry_recursive_target *target_skel = NULL;
+ struct fentry_recursive *tracing_chain[2] = {};
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int prev_fd, err;
+
+ target_skel = fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(target_skel, "fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ /* Create an attachment chain with two fentry progs */
+ for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ tracing_chain[i] = fentry_recursive__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tracing_chain[i], "fentry_recursive__open"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ /* The first prog in the chain is going to be attached to the target
+ * fentry program, the second one to the previous in the chain.
+ */
+ prog = tracing_chain[i]->progs.recursive_attach;
+ if (i == 0) {
+ prev_fd = bpf_program__fd(target_skel->progs.test1);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, prev_fd, "test1");
+ } else {
+ prev_fd = bpf_program__fd(tracing_chain[i-1]->progs.recursive_attach);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, prev_fd, "recursive_attach");
+ }
+
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_attach_target"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ err = fentry_recursive__load(tracing_chain[i]);
+ /* The first attach should succeed, the second fail */
+ if (i == 0) {
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_recursive__load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ if (attach) {
+ err = fentry_recursive__attach(tracing_chain[i]);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_recursive__attach"))
+ goto close_prog;
+ }
+
+ if (detach) {
+ /* Flag attach_tracing_prog should still be set, preventing
+ * attachment of the following prog.
+ */
+ fentry_recursive__detach(tracing_chain[i]);
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "fentry_recursive__load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+ }
+ }
+
+close_prog:
+ fentry_recursive_target__destroy(target_skel);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ fentry_recursive__destroy(tracing_chain[i]);
+ }
+}
+
+void test_recursive_fentry(void)
+{
+ if (test__start_subtest("attach"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(true, false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("load"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(false, false);
+ if (test__start_subtest("detach"))
+ test_recursive_fentry_chain(true, true);
+}
+
+/* Test that a tracing prog reattachment (when we land in
+ * "prog->aux->dst_trampoline and tgt_prog is NULL" branch in
+ * bpf_tracing_prog_attach) does not lead to a crash due to missing attach_btf
+ */
+void test_fentry_attach_btf_presence(void)
+{
+ struct fentry_recursive_target *target_skel = NULL;
+ struct fentry_recursive *tracing_skel = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
+ int err, link_fd, tgt_prog_fd;
+
+ target_skel = fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(target_skel, "fentry_recursive_target__open_and_load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ tracing_skel = fentry_recursive__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tracing_skel, "fentry_recursive__open"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ prog = tracing_skel->progs.recursive_attach;
+ tgt_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(target_skel->progs.fentry_target);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, tgt_prog_fd, "fentry_target");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_attach_target"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ err = fentry_recursive__load(tracing_skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_recursive__load"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ tgt_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tracing_skel->progs.recursive_attach);
+ link_fd = bpf_link_create(tgt_prog_fd, 0, BPF_TRACE_FENTRY, NULL);
+ if (!ASSERT_GE(link_fd, 0, "link_fd"))
+ goto close_prog;
+
+ fentry_recursive__detach(tracing_skel);
+
+ err = fentry_recursive__attach(tracing_skel);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "fentry_recursive__attach");
+
+close_prog:
+ fentry_recursive_target__destroy(target_skel);
+ fentry_recursive__destroy(tracing_skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2c9fb5ac42b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/* Dummy fentry bpf prog for testing fentry attachment chains */
+SEC("fentry/XXX")
+int BPF_PROG(recursive_attach, int a)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..267c876d0aba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_recursive_target.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Red Hat, Inc. */
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+/* Dummy fentry bpf prog for testing fentry attachment chains. It's going to be
+ * a start of the chain.
+ */
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_fentry_test1")
+int BPF_PROG(test1, int a)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Dummy bpf prog for testing attach_btf presence when attaching an fentry
+ * program.
+ */
+SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
+int BPF_PROG(fentry_target, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
+{
+ return 0;
+}