diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/gpio')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst | 42 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst | 59 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst | 299 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst | 28 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/intro.rst | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst | 769 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst | 50 |
8 files changed, 347 insertions, 924 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst index ce91518bf9f4..4fd1cbd8296e 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/board.rst @@ -4,12 +4,6 @@ GPIO Mappings This document explains how GPIOs can be assigned to given devices and functions. -Note that it only applies to the new descriptor-based interface. For a -description of the deprecated integer-based GPIO interface please refer to -gpio-legacy.txt (actually, there is no real mapping possible with the old -interface; you just fetch an integer from somewhere and request the -corresponding GPIO). - All platforms can enable the GPIO library, but if the platform strictly requires GPIO functionality to be present, it needs to select GPIOLIB from its Kconfig. Then, how GPIOs are mapped depends on what the platform uses to @@ -71,14 +65,14 @@ with the help of _DSD (Device Specific Data), introduced in ACPI 5.1:: Device (FOO) { Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () { - GpioIo (Exclusive, ..., IoRestrictionOutputOnly, - "\\_SB.GPI0") {15} // red - GpioIo (Exclusive, ..., IoRestrictionOutputOnly, - "\\_SB.GPI0") {16} // green - GpioIo (Exclusive, ..., IoRestrictionOutputOnly, - "\\_SB.GPI0") {17} // blue - GpioIo (Exclusive, ..., IoRestrictionOutputOnly, - "\\_SB.GPI0") {1} // power + GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, + "\\_SB.GPI0", 0, ResourceConsumer) { 15 } // red + GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, + "\\_SB.GPI0", 0, ResourceConsumer) { 16 } // green + GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, + "\\_SB.GPI0", 0, ResourceConsumer) { 17 } // blue + GpioIo (Exclusive, PullNone, 0, 0, IoRestrictionOutputOnly, + "\\_SB.GPI0", 0, ResourceConsumer) { 1 } // power }) Name (_DSD, Package () { @@ -92,10 +86,7 @@ with the help of _DSD (Device Specific Data), introduced in ACPI 5.1:: ^FOO, 2, 0, 1, } }, - Package () { - "power-gpios", - Package () {^FOO, 3, 0, 0}, - }, + Package () { "power-gpios", Package () { ^FOO, 3, 0, 0 } }, } }) } @@ -113,13 +104,15 @@ files that desire to do so need to include the following header:: GPIOs are mapped by the means of tables of lookups, containing instances of the gpiod_lookup structure. Two macros are defined to help declaring such mappings:: - GPIO_LOOKUP(chip_label, chip_hwnum, con_id, flags) - GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(chip_label, chip_hwnum, con_id, idx, flags) + GPIO_LOOKUP(key, chip_hwnum, con_id, flags) + GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX(key, chip_hwnum, con_id, idx, flags) where - - chip_label is the label of the gpiod_chip instance providing the GPIO - - chip_hwnum is the hardware number of the GPIO within the chip + - key is either the label of the gpiod_chip instance providing the GPIO, or + the GPIO line name + - chip_hwnum is the hardware number of the GPIO within the chip, or U16_MAX + to indicate that key is a GPIO line name - con_id is the name of the GPIO function from the device point of view. It can be NULL, in which case it will match any function. - idx is the index of the GPIO within the function. @@ -135,7 +128,10 @@ where In the future, these flags might be extended to support more properties. -Note that GPIO_LOOKUP() is just a shortcut to GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX() where idx = 0. +Note that: + 1. GPIO line names are not guaranteed to be globally unique, so the first + match found will be used. + 2. GPIO_LOOKUP() is just a shortcut to GPIO_LOOKUP_IDX() where idx = 0. A lookup table can then be defined as follows, with an empty entry defining its end. The 'dev_id' field of the table is the identifier of the device that will diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst index 423492d125b9..bb3366047fad 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst @@ -2,9 +2,7 @@ GPIO Descriptor Consumer Interface ================================== -This document describes the consumer interface of the GPIO framework. Note that -it describes the new descriptor-based interface. For a description of the -deprecated integer-based GPIO interface please refer to gpio-legacy.txt. +This document describes the consumer interface of the GPIO framework. Guidelines for GPIOs consumers @@ -12,7 +10,7 @@ Guidelines for GPIOs consumers Drivers that can't work without standard GPIO calls should have Kconfig entries that depend on GPIOLIB or select GPIOLIB. The functions that allow a driver to -obtain and use GPIOs are available by including the following file: +obtain and use GPIOs are available by including the following file:: #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> @@ -29,6 +27,10 @@ warnings. These stubs are used for two use cases: will use it under other compile-time configurations. In this case the consumer must make sure not to call into these functions, or the user will be met with console warnings that may be perceived as intimidating. + Combining truly optional GPIOLIB usage with calls to + ``[devm_]gpiod_get_optional()`` is a *bad idea*, and will result in weird + error messages. Use the ordinary getter functions with optional GPIOLIB: + some open coding of error handling should be expected when you do this. All the functions that work with the descriptor-based GPIO interface are prefixed with ``gpiod_``. The ``gpio_`` prefix is used for the legacy @@ -72,9 +74,13 @@ for the GPIO. Values can be: * GPIOD_OUT_HIGH_OPEN_DRAIN same as GPIOD_OUT_HIGH but also enforce the line to be electrically used with open drain. +Note that the initial value is *logical* and the physical line level depends on +whether the line is configured active high or active low (see +:ref:`active_low_semantics`). + The two last flags are used for use cases where open drain is mandatory, such as I2C: if the line is not already configured as open drain in the mappings -(see board.txt), then open drain will be enforced anyway and a warning will be +(see board.rst), then open drain will be enforced anyway and a warning will be printed that the board configuration needs to be updated to match the use case. Both functions return either a valid GPIO descriptor, or an error code checkable @@ -110,7 +116,7 @@ For a function using multiple GPIOs all of those can be obtained with one call:: This function returns a struct gpio_descs which contains an array of descriptors. It also contains a pointer to a gpiolib private structure which, -if passed back to get/set array functions, may speed up I/O proocessing:: +if passed back to get/set array functions, may speed up I/O processing:: struct gpio_descs { struct gpio_array *info; @@ -214,9 +220,9 @@ Use the following calls to access GPIOs from an atomic context:: int gpiod_get_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc); void gpiod_set_value(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value); -The values are boolean, zero for low, nonzero for high. When reading the value -of an output pin, the value returned should be what's seen on the pin. That -won't always match the specified output value, because of issues including +The values are boolean, zero for inactive, nonzero for active. When reading the +value of an output pin, the value returned should be what's seen on the pin. +That won't always match the specified output value, because of issues including open-drain signaling and output latencies. The get/set calls do not return errors because "invalid GPIO" should have been @@ -252,6 +258,8 @@ that can't be accessed from hardIRQ handlers, these calls act the same as the spinlock-safe calls. +.. _active_low_semantics: + The active low and open drain semantics --------------------------------------- As a consumer should not have to care about the physical line level, all of the @@ -264,14 +272,14 @@ driven. The same is applicable for open drain or open source output lines: those do not actively drive their output high (open drain) or low (open source), they just switch their output to a high impedance value. The consumer should not need to -care. (For details read about open drain in driver.txt.) +care. (For details read about open drain in driver.rst.) With this, all the gpiod_set_(array)_value_xxx() functions interpret the -parameter "value" as "asserted" ("1") or "de-asserted" ("0"). The physical line +parameter "value" as "active" ("1") or "inactive" ("0"). The physical line level will be driven accordingly. As an example, if the active low property for a dedicated GPIO is set, and the -gpiod_set_(array)_value_xxx() passes "asserted" ("1"), the physical line level +gpiod_set_(array)_value_xxx() passes "active" ("1"), the physical line level will be driven low. To summarize:: @@ -309,9 +317,11 @@ work on the raw line value:: void gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value) int gpiod_direction_output_raw(struct gpio_desc *desc, int value) -The active low state of a GPIO can also be queried using the following call:: +The active low state of a GPIO can also be queried and toggled using the +following calls:: int gpiod_is_active_low(const struct gpio_desc *desc) + void gpiod_toggle_active_low(struct gpio_desc *desc) Note that these functions should only be used with great moderation; a driver should not have to care about the physical line level or open drain semantics. @@ -361,12 +371,13 @@ corresponding chip driver. In that case a significantly improved performance can be expected. If simultaneous access is not possible the GPIOs will be accessed sequentially. -The functions take three arguments: +The functions take four arguments: + * array_size - the number of array elements * desc_array - an array of GPIO descriptors * array_info - optional information obtained from gpiod_get_array() * value_bitmap - a bitmap to store the GPIOs' values (get) or - a bitmap of values to assign to the GPIOs (set) + a bitmap of values to assign to the GPIOs (set) The descriptor array can be obtained using the gpiod_get_array() function or one of its variants. If the group of descriptors returned by that function @@ -440,18 +451,20 @@ For details refer to Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst Interacting With the Legacy GPIO Subsystem ========================================== -Many kernel subsystems still handle GPIOs using the legacy integer-based -interface. Although it is strongly encouraged to upgrade them to the safer -descriptor-based API, the following two functions allow you to convert a GPIO -descriptor into the GPIO integer namespace and vice-versa:: +Many kernel subsystems and drivers still handle GPIOs using the legacy +integer-based interface. It is strongly recommended to update these to the new +gpiod interface. For cases where both interfaces need to be used, the following +two functions allow to convert a GPIO descriptor into the GPIO integer namespace +and vice-versa:: int desc_to_gpio(const struct gpio_desc *desc) struct gpio_desc *gpio_to_desc(unsigned gpio) -The GPIO number returned by desc_to_gpio() can be safely used as long as the -GPIO descriptor has not been freed. All the same, a GPIO number passed to -gpio_to_desc() must have been properly acquired, and usage of the returned GPIO -descriptor is only possible after the GPIO number has been released. +The GPIO number returned by desc_to_gpio() can safely be used as a parameter of +the gpio\_*() functions for as long as the GPIO descriptor `desc` is not freed. +All the same, a GPIO number passed to gpio_to_desc() must first be properly +acquired using e.g. gpio_request_one(), and the returned GPIO descriptor is only +considered valid until that GPIO number is released using gpio_free(). Freeing a GPIO obtained by one API with the other API is forbidden and an unchecked error. diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst index 2ff743105927..ae433261e11a 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ This document serves as a guide for writers of GPIO chip drivers. Each GPIO controller driver needs to include the following header, which defines the structures used to define a GPIO driver:: - #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> + #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> Internal Representation of GPIOs @@ -69,9 +69,8 @@ driver code: The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the controller, preferably using the driver model. That code will configure each -gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add(), gpiochip_add_data(), or -devm_gpiochip_add_data(). Removing a GPIO controller should be rare; use -gpiochip_remove() when it is unavoidable. +gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add_data() or devm_gpiochip_add_data(). Removing +a GPIO controller should be rare; use gpiochip_remove() when it is unavoidable. Often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with states not exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, and more. @@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ GPIO lines with debounce support Debouncing is a configuration set to a pin indicating that it is connected to a mechanical switch or button, or similar that may bounce. Bouncing means the line is pulled high/low quickly at very short intervals for mechanical -reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs fireing repeatedly +reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs firing repeatedly unless the line is debounced. Debouncing in practice involves setting up a timer when something happens on @@ -144,7 +143,7 @@ is not open, it will present a high-impedance (tristate) to the external rail:: in ----|| |/ ||--+ in ----| | |\ - GND GND + GND GND This configuration is normally used as a way to achieve one of two things: @@ -218,10 +217,10 @@ not support open drain/open source in hardware, the GPIO library will instead use a trick: when a line is set as output, if the line is flagged as open drain, and the IN output value is low, it will be driven low as usual. But if the IN output value is set to high, it will instead *NOT* be driven high, -instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is high impedance, thus -achieveing an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically the behaviour will -be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches when switching -the mode of the line. +instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is an equivalent to +high impedance, thus achieving an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically +the behaviour will be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches +when switching the mode of the line. For open source configuration the same principle is used, just that instead of actively driving the line low, it is set to input. @@ -342,12 +341,12 @@ Cascaded GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of three categories: forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to work around this problem:: - raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; - static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) - unsigned long wa_lock_flags; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); - generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit)); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); + raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; + static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) + unsigned long wa_lock_flags; + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); + generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit)); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags); - GENERIC CHAINED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips", but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is @@ -416,30 +415,69 @@ The preferred way to set up the helpers is to fill in the struct gpio_irq_chip inside struct gpio_chip before adding the gpio_chip. If you do this, the additional irq_chip will be set up by gpiolib at the same time as setting up the rest of the GPIO functionality. The following -is a typical example of a cascaded interrupt handler using gpio_irq_chip:: +is a typical example of a chained cascaded interrupt handler using +the gpio_irq_chip. Note how the mask/unmask (or disable/enable) functions +call into the core gpiolib code: .. code-block:: c - /* Typical state container with dynamic irqchip */ + /* Typical state container */ struct my_gpio { struct gpio_chip gc; - struct irq_chip irq; + }; + + static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, + * and then call into the core code to synchronise the + * state. + */ + + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); + } + + static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, + * after having called into the core code to synchronise + * the state. + */ + } + + /* + * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const + * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that + * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra + * callbacks to the structure. + */ + static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { + .name = "my_gpio_irq", + .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, + .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, + .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, + /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, }; int irq; /* from platform etc */ struct my_gpio *g; struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; - /* Set up the irqchip dynamically */ - g->irq.name = "my_gpio_irq"; - g->irq.irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq; - g->irq.irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq; - g->irq.irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq; - g->irq.irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type; - /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ girq = &g->gc.irq; - girq->chip = &g->irq; + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); girq->parent_handler = ftgpio_gpio_irq_handler; girq->num_parents = 1; girq->parents = devm_kcalloc(dev, 1, sizeof(*girq->parents), @@ -452,32 +490,147 @@ is a typical example of a cascaded interrupt handler using gpio_irq_chip:: return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g); -The helper support using hierarchical interrupt controllers as well. -In this case the typical set-up will look like this:: +The helper supports using threaded interrupts as well. Then you just request +the interrupt separately and go with it: .. code-block:: c - /* Typical state container with dynamic irqchip */ + /* Typical state container */ struct my_gpio { struct gpio_chip gc; - struct irq_chip irq; - struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + }; + + static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, + * and then call into the core code to synchronise the + * state. + */ + + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); + } + + static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, + * after having called into the core code to synchronise + * the state. + */ + } + + /* + * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const + * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that + * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra + * callbacks to the structure. + */ + static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { + .name = "my_gpio_irq", + .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, + .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, + .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, + /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, }; int irq; /* from platform etc */ struct my_gpio *g; struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; - /* Set up the irqchip dynamically */ - g->irq.name = "my_gpio_irq"; - g->irq.irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq; - g->irq.irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq; - g->irq.irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq; - g->irq.irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type; + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, irq_thread_fn, + IRQF_ONESHOT, "my-chip", g); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ + girq = &g->gc.irq; + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); + /* This will let us handle the parent IRQ in the driver */ + girq->parent_handler = NULL; + girq->num_parents = 0; + girq->parents = NULL; + girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; + girq->handler = handle_bad_irq; + + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &g->gc, g); + +The helper supports using hierarchical interrupt controllers as well. +In this case the typical set-up will look like this: + +.. code-block:: c + + /* Typical state container with dynamic irqchip */ + struct my_gpio { + struct gpio_chip gc; + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; + }; + + static void my_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to mask the interrupt, + * and then call into the core code to synchronise the + * state. + */ + + gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq); + irq_mask_mask_parent(d); + } + + static void my_gpio_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d) + { + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); + + gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq); + + /* + * Perform any necessary action to unmask the interrupt, + * after having called into the core code to synchronise + * the state. + */ + + irq_mask_unmask_parent(d); + } + + /* + * Statically populate the irqchip. Note that it is made const + * (further indicated by the IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE flag), and that + * the GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPER macro adds some extra + * callbacks to the structure. + */ + static const struct irq_chip my_gpio_irq_chip = { + .name = "my_gpio_irq", + .irq_ack = my_gpio_ack_irq, + .irq_mask = my_gpio_mask_irq, + .irq_unmask = my_gpio_unmask_irq, + .irq_set_type = my_gpio_set_irq_type, + .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, + /* Provide the gpio resource callbacks */ + GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, + }; + + struct my_gpio *g; + struct gpio_irq_chip *girq; /* Get a pointer to the gpio_irq_chip */ girq = &g->gc.irq; - girq->chip = &g->irq; + gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &my_gpio_irq_chip); girq->default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; girq->handler = handle_bad_irq; girq->fwnode = g->fwnode; @@ -488,42 +641,18 @@ In this case the typical set-up will look like this:: As you can see pretty similar, but you do not supply a parent handler for the IRQ, instead a parent irqdomain, an fwnode for the hardware and -a funcion .child_to_parent_hwirq() that has the purpose of looking up +a function .child_to_parent_hwirq() that has the purpose of looking up the parent hardware irq from a child (i.e. this gpio chip) hardware irq. As always it is good to look at examples in the kernel tree for advice on how to find the required pieces. -The old way of adding irqchips to gpiochips after registration is also still -available but we try to move away from this: - -- DEPRECATED: gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds a chained cascaded irqchip to a - gpiochip. It will pass the struct gpio_chip* for the chip to all IRQ - callbacks, so the callbacks need to embed the gpio_chip in its state - container and obtain a pointer to the container using container_of(). - (See Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/design-patterns.rst) - -- gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(): adds a nested cascaded irqchip to a gpiochip, - as discussed above regarding different types of cascaded irqchips. The - cascaded irq has to be handled by a threaded interrupt handler. - Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip. - -- DEPRECATED: gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained cascaded irq - handler for a gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip* - as handler data. Notice that we pass is as the handler data, since the - irqchip data is likely used by the parent irqchip. - -- gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested cascaded irq handler for a - gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been - explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than - mark all the child IRQs as having the other IRQ as parent. - If there is a need to exclude certain GPIO lines from the IRQ domain handled by these helpers, we can set .irq.need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before devm_gpiochip_add_data() or gpiochip_add_data() is called. This allocates an .irq.valid_mask with as many bits set as there are GPIO lines in the chip, each bit representing line 0..n-1. Drivers can exclude GPIO lines by clearing bits -from this mask. The mask must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() or -gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() is called. +from this mask. The mask can be filled in the init_valid_mask() callback +that is part of the struct gpio_irq_chip. To use the helpers please keep the following in mind: @@ -531,13 +660,10 @@ To use the helpers please keep the following in mind: the irqchip can initialize. E.g. .dev and .can_sleep shall be set up properly. -- Nominally set all handlers to handle_bad_irq() in the setup call and pass - handle_bad_irq() as flow handler parameter in gpiochip_irqchip_add() if it is - expected for GPIO driver that irqchip .set_type() callback will be called - before using/enabling each GPIO IRQ. Then set the handler to - handle_level_irq() and/or handle_edge_irq() in the irqchip .set_type() - callback depending on what your controller supports and what is requested - by the consumer. +- Nominally set gpio_irq_chip.handler to handle_bad_irq. Then, if your irqchip + is cascaded, set the handler to handle_level_irq() and/or handle_edge_irq() + in the irqchip .set_type() callback depending on what your controller + supports and what is requested by the consumer. Locking IRQ usage @@ -554,12 +680,12 @@ certain operations and keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem. Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ:: - int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) + int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock is released:: - void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) + void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the @@ -581,19 +707,20 @@ When a GPIO is used as an IRQ signal, then gpiolib also needs to know if the IRQ is enabled or disabled. In order to inform gpiolib about this, the irqchip driver should call:: - void gpiochip_disable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) + void gpiochip_disable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) This allows drivers to drive the GPIO as an output while the IRQ is disabled. When the IRQ is enabled again, a driver should call:: - void gpiochip_enable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) + void gpiochip_enable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset) When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should typically be called in the .irq_disable() and .irq_enable() callbacks from the irqchip. -When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callbacks are automatically -assigned. +When IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE is not advertised by the irqchip, these callbacks +are automatically assigned. This behaviour is deprecated and on its way +to be removed from the kernel. Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips @@ -624,8 +751,8 @@ compliance: level and edge IRQs * [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html -* [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/494 -* [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/495 +* [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com +* [3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1443209283-20781-3-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com Requesting self-owned GPIO pins @@ -635,12 +762,12 @@ Sometimes it is useful to allow a GPIO chip driver to request its own GPIO descriptors through the gpiolib API. A GPIO driver can use the following functions to request and free descriptors:: - struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc, - u16 hwnum, - const char *label, - enum gpiod_flags flags) + struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc, + u16 hwnum, + const char *label, + enum gpiod_flags flags) - void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc) + void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc) Descriptors requested with gpiochip_request_own_desc() must be released with gpiochip_free_own_desc(). diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst index f3a189320e11..95572d2a94ce 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst @@ -27,7 +27,12 @@ hardware descriptions such as device tree or ACPI: to the lines for a more permanent solution of this type. - gpio-beeper: drivers/input/misc/gpio-beeper.c is used to provide a beep from - an external speaker connected to a GPIO line. + an external speaker connected to a GPIO line. (If the beep is controlled by + off/on, for an actual PWM waveform, see pwm-gpio below.) + +- pwm-gpio: drivers/pwm/pwm-gpio.c is used to toggle a GPIO with a high + resolution timer producing a PWM waveform on the GPIO line, as well as + Linux high resolution timers can do. - extcon-gpio: drivers/extcon/extcon-gpio.c is used when you need to read an external connector status, such as a headset line for an audio driver or an @@ -89,13 +94,26 @@ hardware descriptions such as device tree or ACPI: Consumer Electronics Control bus using only GPIO. It is used to communicate with devices on the HDMI bus. +- gpio-charger: drivers/power/supply/gpio-charger.c is used if you need to do + battery charging and all you have to go by to check the presence of the + AC charger or more complex tasks such as indicating charging status using + nothing but GPIO lines, this driver provides that and also a clearly defined + way to pass the charging parameters from hardware descriptions such as the + device tree. + +- gpio-mux: drivers/mux/gpio.c is used for controlling a multiplexer using + n GPIO lines such that you can mux in 2^n different devices by activating + different GPIO lines. Often the GPIOs are on a SoC and the devices are + some SoC-external entities, such as different components on a PCB that + can be selectively enabled. + Apart from this there are special GPIO drivers in subsystems like MMC/SD to read card detect and write protect GPIO lines, and in the TTY serial subsystem to emulate MCTRL (modem control) signals CTS/RTS by using two GPIO lines. The MTD NOR flash has add-ons for extra GPIO lines too, though the address bus is usually connected directly to the flash. -Use those instead of talking directly to the GPIOs using sysfs; they integrate -with kernel frameworks better than your userspace code could. Needless to say, -just using the appropriate kernel drivers will simplify and speed up your -embedded hacking in particular by providing ready-made components. +Use those instead of talking directly to the GPIOs from userspace; they +integrate with kernel frameworks better than your userspace code could. +Needless to say, just using the appropriate kernel drivers will simplify and +speed up your embedded hacking in particular by providing ready-made components. diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst index 5b61032aa4ea..34b57cee3391 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Contents: :maxdepth: 2 intro + using-gpio driver consumer board drivers-on-gpio - legacy bt8xxgpio Core diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/intro.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/intro.rst index 74591489d0b5..5936a9c57df3 100644 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/intro.rst +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/intro.rst @@ -10,24 +10,12 @@ The documents in this directory give detailed instructions on how to access GPIOs in drivers, and how to write a driver for a device that provides GPIOs itself. -Due to the history of GPIO interfaces in the kernel, there are two different -ways to obtain and use GPIOs: - - - The descriptor-based interface is the preferred way to manipulate GPIOs, - and is described by all the files in this directory excepted gpio-legacy.txt. - - The legacy integer-based interface which is considered deprecated (but still - usable for compatibility reasons) is documented in gpio-legacy.txt. - -The remainder of this document applies to the new descriptor-based interface. -gpio-legacy.txt contains the same information applied to the legacy -integer-based interface. - What is a GPIO? =============== A "General Purpose Input/Output" (GPIO) is a flexible software-controlled -digital signal. They are provided from many kinds of chip, and are familiar +digital signal. They are provided from many kinds of chips, and are familiar to Linux developers working with embedded and custom hardware. Each GPIO represents a bit connected to a particular pin, or "ball" on Ball Grid Array (BGA) packages. Board schematics show which external hardware connects to @@ -106,11 +94,11 @@ don't. When you need open drain signaling but your hardware doesn't directly support it, there's a common idiom you can use to emulate it with any GPIO pin that can be used as either an input or an output: - LOW: gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 0) ... this drives the signal and overrides - the pullup. + **LOW**: ``gpiod_direction_output(gpio, 0)`` ... this drives the signal and + overrides the pullup. - HIGH: gpiod_direction_input(gpio) ... this turns off the output, so the pullup - (or some other device) controls the signal. + **HIGH**: ``gpiod_direction_input(gpio)`` ... this turns off the output, so + the pullup (or some other device) controls the signal. The same logic can be applied to emulate open source signaling, by driving the high signal and configuring the GPIO as input for low. This open drain/open diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 9bc34ba697d9..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/legacy.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,769 +0,0 @@ -====================== -Legacy GPIO Interfaces -====================== - -This provides an overview of GPIO access conventions on Linux. - -These calls use the gpio_* naming prefix. No other calls should use that -prefix, or the related __gpio_* prefix. - - -What is a GPIO? -=============== -A "General Purpose Input/Output" (GPIO) is a flexible software-controlled -digital signal. They are provided from many kinds of chip, and are familiar -to Linux developers working with embedded and custom hardware. Each GPIO -represents a bit connected to a particular pin, or "ball" on Ball Grid Array -(BGA) packages. Board schematics show which external hardware connects to -which GPIOs. Drivers can be written generically, so that board setup code -passes such pin configuration data to drivers. - -System-on-Chip (SOC) processors heavily rely on GPIOs. In some cases, every -non-dedicated pin can be configured as a GPIO; and most chips have at least -several dozen of them. Programmable logic devices (like FPGAs) can easily -provide GPIOs; multifunction chips like power managers, and audio codecs -often have a few such pins to help with pin scarcity on SOCs; and there are -also "GPIO Expander" chips that connect using the I2C or SPI serial busses. -Most PC southbridges have a few dozen GPIO-capable pins (with only the BIOS -firmware knowing how they're used). - -The exact capabilities of GPIOs vary between systems. Common options: - - - Output values are writable (high=1, low=0). Some chips also have - options about how that value is driven, so that for example only one - value might be driven ... supporting "wire-OR" and similar schemes - for the other value (notably, "open drain" signaling). - - - Input values are likewise readable (1, 0). Some chips support readback - of pins configured as "output", which is very useful in such "wire-OR" - cases (to support bidirectional signaling). GPIO controllers may have - input de-glitch/debounce logic, sometimes with software controls. - - - Inputs can often be used as IRQ signals, often edge triggered but - sometimes level triggered. Such IRQs may be configurable as system - wakeup events, to wake the system from a low power state. - - - Usually a GPIO will be configurable as either input or output, as needed - by different product boards; single direction ones exist too. - - - Most GPIOs can be accessed while holding spinlocks, but those accessed - through a serial bus normally can't. Some systems support both types. - -On a given board each GPIO is used for one specific purpose like monitoring -MMC/SD card insertion/removal, detecting card writeprotect status, driving -a LED, configuring a transceiver, bitbanging a serial bus, poking a hardware -watchdog, sensing a switch, and so on. - - -GPIO conventions -================ -Note that this is called a "convention" because you don't need to do it this -way, and it's no crime if you don't. There **are** cases where portability -is not the main issue; GPIOs are often used for the kind of board-specific -glue logic that may even change between board revisions, and can't ever be -used on a board that's wired differently. Only least-common-denominator -functionality can be very portable. Other features are platform-specific, -and that can be critical for glue logic. - -Plus, this doesn't require any implementation framework, just an interface. -One platform might implement it as simple inline functions accessing chip -registers; another might implement it by delegating through abstractions -used for several very different kinds of GPIO controller. (There is some -optional code supporting such an implementation strategy, described later -in this document, but drivers acting as clients to the GPIO interface must -not care how it's implemented.) - -That said, if the convention is supported on their platform, drivers should -use it when possible. Platforms must select GPIOLIB if GPIO functionality -is strictly required. Drivers that can't work without -standard GPIO calls should have Kconfig entries which depend on GPIOLIB. The -GPIO calls are available, either as "real code" or as optimized-away stubs, -when drivers use the include file: - - #include <linux/gpio.h> - -If you stick to this convention then it'll be easier for other developers to -see what your code is doing, and help maintain it. - -Note that these operations include I/O barriers on platforms which need to -use them; drivers don't need to add them explicitly. - - -Identifying GPIOs ------------------ -GPIOs are identified by unsigned integers in the range 0..MAX_INT. That -reserves "negative" numbers for other purposes like marking signals as -"not available on this board", or indicating faults. Code that doesn't -touch the underlying hardware treats these integers as opaque cookies. - -Platforms define how they use those integers, and usually #define symbols -for the GPIO lines so that board-specific setup code directly corresponds -to the relevant schematics. In contrast, drivers should only use GPIO -numbers passed to them from that setup code, using platform_data to hold -board-specific pin configuration data (along with other board specific -data they need). That avoids portability problems. - -So for example one platform uses numbers 32-159 for GPIOs; while another -uses numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another -type of GPIO controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. -The numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also -use numbers 2000-2063 to identify GPIOs in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders. - -If you want to initialize a structure with an invalid GPIO number, use -some negative number (perhaps "-EINVAL"); that will never be valid. To -test if such number from such a structure could reference a GPIO, you -may use this predicate: - - int gpio_is_valid(int number); - -A number that's not valid will be rejected by calls which may request -or free GPIOs (see below). Other numbers may also be rejected; for -example, a number might be valid but temporarily unused on a given board. - -Whether a platform supports multiple GPIO controllers is a platform-specific -implementation issue, as are whether that support can leave "holes" in the space -of GPIO numbers, and whether new controllers can be added at runtime. Such issues -can affect things including whether adjacent GPIO numbers are both valid. - -Using GPIOs ------------ -The first thing a system should do with a GPIO is allocate it, using -the gpio_request() call; see later. - -One of the next things to do with a GPIO, often in board setup code when -setting up a platform_device using the GPIO, is mark its direction:: - - /* set as input or output, returning 0 or negative errno */ - int gpio_direction_input(unsigned gpio); - int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value); - -The return value is zero for success, else a negative errno. It should -be checked, since the get/set calls don't have error returns and since -misconfiguration is possible. You should normally issue these calls from -a task context. However, for spinlock-safe GPIOs it's OK to use them -before tasking is enabled, as part of early board setup. - -For output GPIOs, the value provided becomes the initial output value. -This helps avoid signal glitching during system startup. - -For compatibility with legacy interfaces to GPIOs, setting the direction -of a GPIO implicitly requests that GPIO (see below) if it has not been -requested already. That compatibility is being removed from the optional -gpiolib framework. - -Setting the direction can fail if the GPIO number is invalid, or when -that particular GPIO can't be used in that mode. It's generally a bad -idea to rely on boot firmware to have set the direction correctly, since -it probably wasn't validated to do more than boot Linux. (Similarly, -that board setup code probably needs to multiplex that pin as a GPIO, -and configure pullups/pulldowns appropriately.) - - -Spinlock-Safe GPIO access -------------------------- -Most GPIO controllers can be accessed with memory read/write instructions. -Those don't need to sleep, and can safely be done from inside hard -(nonthreaded) IRQ handlers and similar contexts. - -Use the following calls to access such GPIOs, -for which gpio_cansleep() will always return false (see below):: - - /* GPIO INPUT: return zero or nonzero */ - int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio); - - /* GPIO OUTPUT */ - void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value); - -The values are boolean, zero for low, nonzero for high. When reading the -value of an output pin, the value returned should be what's seen on the -pin ... that won't always match the specified output value, because of -issues including open-drain signaling and output latencies. - -The get/set calls have no error returns because "invalid GPIO" should have -been reported earlier from gpio_direction_*(). However, note that not all -platforms can read the value of output pins; those that can't should always -return zero. Also, using these calls for GPIOs that can't safely be accessed -without sleeping (see below) is an error. - -Platform-specific implementations are encouraged to optimize the two -calls to access the GPIO value in cases where the GPIO number (and for -output, value) are constant. It's normal for them to need only a couple -of instructions in such cases (reading or writing a hardware register), -and not to need spinlocks. Such optimized calls can make bitbanging -applications a lot more efficient (in both space and time) than spending -dozens of instructions on subroutine calls. - - -GPIO access that may sleep --------------------------- -Some GPIO controllers must be accessed using message based busses like I2C -or SPI. Commands to read or write those GPIO values require waiting to -get to the head of a queue to transmit a command and get its response. -This requires sleeping, which can't be done from inside IRQ handlers. - -Platforms that support this type of GPIO distinguish them from other GPIOs -by returning nonzero from this call (which requires a valid GPIO number, -which should have been previously allocated with gpio_request):: - - int gpio_cansleep(unsigned gpio); - -To access such GPIOs, a different set of accessors is defined:: - - /* GPIO INPUT: return zero or nonzero, might sleep */ - int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio); - - /* GPIO OUTPUT, might sleep */ - void gpio_set_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio, int value); - - -Accessing such GPIOs requires a context which may sleep, for example -a threaded IRQ handler, and those accessors must be used instead of -spinlock-safe accessors without the cansleep() name suffix. - -Other than the fact that these accessors might sleep, and will work -on GPIOs that can't be accessed from hardIRQ handlers, these calls act -the same as the spinlock-safe calls. - -**IN ADDITION** calls to setup and configure such GPIOs must be made -from contexts which may sleep, since they may need to access the GPIO -controller chip too (These setup calls are usually made from board -setup or driver probe/teardown code, so this is an easy constraint.):: - - gpio_direction_input() - gpio_direction_output() - gpio_request() - - ## gpio_request_one() - ## gpio_request_array() - ## gpio_free_array() - - gpio_free() - gpio_set_debounce() - - - -Claiming and Releasing GPIOs ----------------------------- -To help catch system configuration errors, two calls are defined:: - - /* request GPIO, returning 0 or negative errno. - * non-null labels may be useful for diagnostics. - */ - int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label); - - /* release previously-claimed GPIO */ - void gpio_free(unsigned gpio); - -Passing invalid GPIO numbers to gpio_request() will fail, as will requesting -GPIOs that have already been claimed with that call. The return value of -gpio_request() must be checked. You should normally issue these calls from -a task context. However, for spinlock-safe GPIOs it's OK to request GPIOs -before tasking is enabled, as part of early board setup. - -These calls serve two basic purposes. One is marking the signals which -are actually in use as GPIOs, for better diagnostics; systems may have -several hundred potential GPIOs, but often only a dozen are used on any -given board. Another is to catch conflicts, identifying errors when -(a) two or more drivers wrongly think they have exclusive use of that -signal, or (b) something wrongly believes it's safe to remove drivers -needed to manage a signal that's in active use. That is, requesting a -GPIO can serve as a kind of lock. - -Some platforms may also use knowledge about what GPIOs are active for -power management, such as by powering down unused chip sectors and, more -easily, gating off unused clocks. - -For GPIOs that use pins known to the pinctrl subsystem, that subsystem should -be informed of their use; a gpiolib driver's .request() operation may call -pinctrl_gpio_request(), and a gpiolib driver's .free() operation may call -pinctrl_gpio_free(). The pinctrl subsystem allows a pinctrl_gpio_request() -to succeed concurrently with a pin or pingroup being "owned" by a device for -pin multiplexing. - -Any programming of pin multiplexing hardware that is needed to route the -GPIO signal to the appropriate pin should occur within a GPIO driver's -.direction_input() or .direction_output() operations, and occur after any -setup of an output GPIO's value. This allows a glitch-free migration from a -pin's special function to GPIO. This is sometimes required when using a GPIO -to implement a workaround on signals typically driven by a non-GPIO HW block. - -Some platforms allow some or all GPIO signals to be routed to different pins. -Similarly, other aspects of the GPIO or pin may need to be configured, such as -pullup/pulldown. Platform software should arrange that any such details are -configured prior to gpio_request() being called for those GPIOs, e.g. using -the pinctrl subsystem's mapping table, so that GPIO users need not be aware -of these details. - -Also note that it's your responsibility to have stopped using a GPIO -before you free it. - -Considering in most cases GPIOs are actually configured right after they -are claimed, three additional calls are defined:: - - /* request a single GPIO, with initial configuration specified by - * 'flags', identical to gpio_request() wrt other arguments and - * return value - */ - int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio, unsigned long flags, const char *label); - - /* request multiple GPIOs in a single call - */ - int gpio_request_array(struct gpio *array, size_t num); - - /* release multiple GPIOs in a single call - */ - void gpio_free_array(struct gpio *array, size_t num); - -where 'flags' is currently defined to specify the following properties: - - * GPIOF_DIR_IN - to configure direction as input - * GPIOF_DIR_OUT - to configure direction as output - - * GPIOF_INIT_LOW - as output, set initial level to LOW - * GPIOF_INIT_HIGH - as output, set initial level to HIGH - * GPIOF_OPEN_DRAIN - gpio pin is open drain type. - * GPIOF_OPEN_SOURCE - gpio pin is open source type. - - * GPIOF_EXPORT_DIR_FIXED - export gpio to sysfs, keep direction - * GPIOF_EXPORT_DIR_CHANGEABLE - also export, allow changing direction - -since GPIOF_INIT_* are only valid when configured as output, so group valid -combinations as: - - * GPIOF_IN - configure as input - * GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW - configured as output, initial level LOW - * GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH - configured as output, initial level HIGH - -When setting the flag as GPIOF_OPEN_DRAIN then it will assume that pins is -open drain type. Such pins will not be driven to 1 in output mode. It is -require to connect pull-up on such pins. By enabling this flag, gpio lib will -make the direction to input when it is asked to set value of 1 in output mode -to make the pin HIGH. The pin is make to LOW by driving value 0 in output mode. - -When setting the flag as GPIOF_OPEN_SOURCE then it will assume that pins is -open source type. Such pins will not be driven to 0 in output mode. It is -require to connect pull-down on such pin. By enabling this flag, gpio lib will -make the direction to input when it is asked to set value of 0 in output mode -to make the pin LOW. The pin is make to HIGH by driving value 1 in output mode. - -In the future, these flags can be extended to support more properties. - -Further more, to ease the claim/release of multiple GPIOs, 'struct gpio' is -introduced to encapsulate all three fields as:: - - struct gpio { - unsigned gpio; - unsigned long flags; - const char *label; - }; - -A typical example of usage:: - - static struct gpio leds_gpios[] = { - { 32, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "Power LED" }, /* default to ON */ - { 33, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "Green LED" }, /* default to OFF */ - { 34, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "Red LED" }, /* default to OFF */ - { 35, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "Blue LED" }, /* default to OFF */ - { ... }, - }; - - err = gpio_request_one(31, GPIOF_IN, "Reset Button"); - if (err) - ... - - err = gpio_request_array(leds_gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(leds_gpios)); - if (err) - ... - - gpio_free_array(leds_gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(leds_gpios)); - - -GPIOs mapped to IRQs --------------------- -GPIO numbers are unsigned integers; so are IRQ numbers. These make up -two logically distinct namespaces (GPIO 0 need not use IRQ 0). You can -map between them using calls like:: - - /* map GPIO numbers to IRQ numbers */ - int gpio_to_irq(unsigned gpio); - - /* map IRQ numbers to GPIO numbers (avoid using this) */ - int irq_to_gpio(unsigned irq); - -Those return either the corresponding number in the other namespace, or -else a negative errno code if the mapping can't be done. (For example, -some GPIOs can't be used as IRQs.) It is an unchecked error to use a GPIO -number that wasn't set up as an input using gpio_direction_input(), or -to use an IRQ number that didn't originally come from gpio_to_irq(). - -These two mapping calls are expected to cost on the order of a single -addition or subtraction. They're not allowed to sleep. - -Non-error values returned from gpio_to_irq() can be passed to request_irq() -or free_irq(). They will often be stored into IRQ resources for platform -devices, by the board-specific initialization code. Note that IRQ trigger -options are part of the IRQ interface, e.g. IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, as are -system wakeup capabilities. - -Non-error values returned from irq_to_gpio() would most commonly be used -with gpio_get_value(), for example to initialize or update driver state -when the IRQ is edge-triggered. Note that some platforms don't support -this reverse mapping, so you should avoid using it. - - -Emulating Open Drain Signals ----------------------------- -Sometimes shared signals need to use "open drain" signaling, where only the -low signal level is actually driven. (That term applies to CMOS transistors; -"open collector" is used for TTL.) A pullup resistor causes the high signal -level. This is sometimes called a "wire-AND"; or more practically, from the -negative logic (low=true) perspective this is a "wire-OR". - -One common example of an open drain signal is a shared active-low IRQ line. -Also, bidirectional data bus signals sometimes use open drain signals. - -Some GPIO controllers directly support open drain outputs; many don't. When -you need open drain signaling but your hardware doesn't directly support it, -there's a common idiom you can use to emulate it with any GPIO pin that can -be used as either an input or an output: - - LOW: gpio_direction_output(gpio, 0) ... this drives the signal - and overrides the pullup. - - HIGH: gpio_direction_input(gpio) ... this turns off the output, - so the pullup (or some other device) controls the signal. - -If you are "driving" the signal high but gpio_get_value(gpio) reports a low -value (after the appropriate rise time passes), you know some other component -is driving the shared signal low. That's not necessarily an error. As one -common example, that's how I2C clocks are stretched: a slave that needs a -slower clock delays the rising edge of SCK, and the I2C master adjusts its -signaling rate accordingly. - - -GPIO controllers and the pinctrl subsystem ------------------------------------------- - -A GPIO controller on a SOC might be tightly coupled with the pinctrl -subsystem, in the sense that the pins can be used by other functions -together with an optional gpio feature. We have already covered the -case where e.g. a GPIO controller need to reserve a pin or set the -direction of a pin by calling any of:: - - pinctrl_gpio_request() - pinctrl_gpio_free() - pinctrl_gpio_direction_input() - pinctrl_gpio_direction_output() - -But how does the pin control subsystem cross-correlate the GPIO -numbers (which are a global business) to a certain pin on a certain -pin controller? - -This is done by registering "ranges" of pins, which are essentially -cross-reference tables. These are described in -Documentation/driver-api/pinctl.rst - -While the pin allocation is totally managed by the pinctrl subsystem, -gpio (under gpiolib) is still maintained by gpio drivers. It may happen -that different pin ranges in a SoC is managed by different gpio drivers. - -This makes it logical to let gpio drivers announce their pin ranges to -the pin ctrl subsystem before it will call 'pinctrl_gpio_request' in order -to request the corresponding pin to be prepared by the pinctrl subsystem -before any gpio usage. - -For this, the gpio controller can register its pin range with pinctrl -subsystem. There are two ways of doing it currently: with or without DT. - -For with DT support refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. - -For non-DT support, user can call gpiochip_add_pin_range() with appropriate -parameters to register a range of gpio pins with a pinctrl driver. For this -exact name string of pinctrl device has to be passed as one of the -argument to this routine. - - -What do these conventions omit? -=============================== -One of the biggest things these conventions omit is pin multiplexing, since -this is highly chip-specific and nonportable. One platform might not need -explicit multiplexing; another might have just two options for use of any -given pin; another might have eight options per pin; another might be able -to route a given GPIO to any one of several pins. (Yes, those examples all -come from systems that run Linux today.) - -Related to multiplexing is configuration and enabling of the pullups or -pulldowns integrated on some platforms. Not all platforms support them, -or support them in the same way; and any given board might use external -pullups (or pulldowns) so that the on-chip ones should not be used. -(When a circuit needs 5 kOhm, on-chip 100 kOhm resistors won't do.) -Likewise drive strength (2 mA vs 20 mA) and voltage (1.8V vs 3.3V) is a -platform-specific issue, as are models like (not) having a one-to-one -correspondence between configurable pins and GPIOs. - -There are other system-specific mechanisms that are not specified here, -like the aforementioned options for input de-glitching and wire-OR output. -Hardware may support reading or writing GPIOs in gangs, but that's usually -configuration dependent: for GPIOs sharing the same bank. (GPIOs are -commonly grouped in banks of 16 or 32, with a given SOC having several such -banks.) Some systems can trigger IRQs from output GPIOs, or read values -from pins not managed as GPIOs. Code relying on such mechanisms will -necessarily be nonportable. - -Dynamic definition of GPIOs is not currently standard; for example, as -a side effect of configuring an add-on board with some GPIO expanders. - - -GPIO implementor's framework (OPTIONAL) -======================================= -As noted earlier, there is an optional implementation framework making it -easier for platforms to support different kinds of GPIO controller using -the same programming interface. This framework is called "gpiolib". - -As a debugging aid, if debugfs is available a /sys/kernel/debug/gpio file -will be found there. That will list all the controllers registered through -this framework, and the state of the GPIOs currently in use. - - -Controller Drivers: gpio_chip ------------------------------ -In this framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct gpio_chip" -with information common to each controller of that type: - - - methods to establish GPIO direction - - methods used to access GPIO values - - flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep - - optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state like pullup config) - - label for diagnostics - -There is also per-instance data, which may come from device.platform_data: -the number of its first GPIO, and how many GPIOs it exposes. - -The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the -controller, possibly using the driver model. That code will configure each -gpio_chip and issue gpiochip_add(). Removing a GPIO controller should be -rare; use gpiochip_remove() when it is unavoidable. - -Most often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with state -not exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, -and more. Chips such as codecs will have complex non-GPIO state. - -Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore signals which haven't been -requested as GPIOs. They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns -either NULL or the label associated with that GPIO when it was requested. - - -Platform Support ----------------- -To force-enable this framework, a platform's Kconfig will "select" GPIOLIB, -else it is up to the user to configure support for GPIO. - -It may also provide a custom value for ARCH_NR_GPIOS, so that it better -reflects the number of GPIOs in actual use on that platform, without -wasting static table space. (It should count both built-in/SoC GPIOs and -also ones on GPIO expanders. - -If neither of these options are selected, the platform does not support -GPIOs through GPIO-lib and the code cannot be enabled by the user. - -Trivial implementations of those functions can directly use framework -code, which always dispatches through the gpio_chip:: - - #define gpio_get_value __gpio_get_value - #define gpio_set_value __gpio_set_value - #define gpio_cansleep __gpio_cansleep - -Fancier implementations could instead define those as inline functions with -logic optimizing access to specific SOC-based GPIOs. For example, if the -referenced GPIO is the constant "12", getting or setting its value could -cost as little as two or three instructions, never sleeping. When such an -optimization is not possible those calls must delegate to the framework -code, costing at least a few dozen instructions. For bitbanged I/O, such -instruction savings can be significant. - -For SOCs, platform-specific code defines and registers gpio_chip instances -for each bank of on-chip GPIOs. Those GPIOs should be numbered/labeled to -match chip vendor documentation, and directly match board schematics. They -may well start at zero and go up to a platform-specific limit. Such GPIOs -are normally integrated into platform initialization to make them always be -available, from arch_initcall() or earlier; they can often serve as IRQs. - - -Board Support -------------- -For external GPIO controllers -- such as I2C or SPI expanders, ASICs, multi -function devices, FPGAs or CPLDs -- most often board-specific code handles -registering controller devices and ensures that their drivers know what GPIO -numbers to use with gpiochip_add(). Their numbers often start right after -platform-specific GPIOs. - -For example, board setup code could create structures identifying the range -of GPIOs that chip will expose, and passes them to each GPIO expander chip -using platform_data. Then the chip driver's probe() routine could pass that -data to gpiochip_add(). - -Initialization order can be important. For example, when a device relies on -an I2C-based GPIO, its probe() routine should only be called after that GPIO -becomes available. That may mean the device should not be registered until -calls for that GPIO can work. One way to address such dependencies is for -such gpio_chip controllers to provide setup() and teardown() callbacks to -board specific code; those board specific callbacks would register devices -once all the necessary resources are available, and remove them later when -the GPIO controller device becomes unavailable. - - -Sysfs Interface for Userspace (OPTIONAL) -======================================== -Platforms which use the "gpiolib" implementors framework may choose to -configure a sysfs user interface to GPIOs. This is different from the -debugfs interface, since it provides control over GPIO direction and -value instead of just showing a gpio state summary. Plus, it could be -present on production systems without debugging support. - -Given appropriate hardware documentation for the system, userspace could -know for example that GPIO #23 controls the write protect line used to -protect boot loader segments in flash memory. System upgrade procedures -may need to temporarily remove that protection, first importing a GPIO, -then changing its output state, then updating the code before re-enabling -the write protection. In normal use, GPIO #23 would never be touched, -and the kernel would have no need to know about it. - -Again depending on appropriate hardware documentation, on some systems -userspace GPIO can be used to determine system configuration data that -standard kernels won't know about. And for some tasks, simple userspace -GPIO drivers could be all that the system really needs. - -Note that standard kernel drivers exist for common "LEDs and Buttons" -GPIO tasks: "leds-gpio" and "gpio_keys", respectively. Use those -instead of talking directly to the GPIOs; they integrate with kernel -frameworks better than your userspace code could. - - -Paths in Sysfs --------------- -There are three kinds of entry in /sys/class/gpio: - - - Control interfaces used to get userspace control over GPIOs; - - - GPIOs themselves; and - - - GPIO controllers ("gpio_chip" instances). - -That's in addition to standard files including the "device" symlink. - -The control interfaces are write-only: - - /sys/class/gpio/ - - "export" ... Userspace may ask the kernel to export control of - a GPIO to userspace by writing its number to this file. - - Example: "echo 19 > export" will create a "gpio19" node - for GPIO #19, if that's not requested by kernel code. - - "unexport" ... Reverses the effect of exporting to userspace. - - Example: "echo 19 > unexport" will remove a "gpio19" - node exported using the "export" file. - -GPIO signals have paths like /sys/class/gpio/gpio42/ (for GPIO #42) -and have the following read/write attributes: - - /sys/class/gpio/gpioN/ - - "direction" ... reads as either "in" or "out". This value may - normally be written. Writing as "out" defaults to - initializing the value as low. To ensure glitch free - operation, values "low" and "high" may be written to - configure the GPIO as an output with that initial value. - - Note that this attribute *will not exist* if the kernel - doesn't support changing the direction of a GPIO, or - it was exported by kernel code that didn't explicitly - allow userspace to reconfigure this GPIO's direction. - - "value" ... reads as either 0 (low) or 1 (high). If the GPIO - is configured as an output, this value may be written; - any nonzero value is treated as high. - - If the pin can be configured as interrupt-generating interrupt - and if it has been configured to generate interrupts (see the - description of "edge"), you can poll(2) on that file and - poll(2) will return whenever the interrupt was triggered. If - you use poll(2), set the events POLLPRI. If you use select(2), - set the file descriptor in exceptfds. After poll(2) returns, - either lseek(2) to the beginning of the sysfs file and read the - new value or close the file and re-open it to read the value. - - "edge" ... reads as either "none", "rising", "falling", or - "both". Write these strings to select the signal edge(s) - that will make poll(2) on the "value" file return. - - This file exists only if the pin can be configured as an - interrupt generating input pin. - - "active_low" ... reads as either 0 (false) or 1 (true). Write - any nonzero value to invert the value attribute both - for reading and writing. Existing and subsequent - poll(2) support configuration via the edge attribute - for "rising" and "falling" edges will follow this - setting. - -GPIO controllers have paths like /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip42/ (for the -controller implementing GPIOs starting at #42) and have the following -read-only attributes: - - /sys/class/gpio/gpiochipN/ - - "base" ... same as N, the first GPIO managed by this chip - - "label" ... provided for diagnostics (not always unique) - - "ngpio" ... how many GPIOs this manges (N to N + ngpio - 1) - -Board documentation should in most cases cover what GPIOs are used for -what purposes. However, those numbers are not always stable; GPIOs on -a daughtercard might be different depending on the base board being used, -or other cards in the stack. In such cases, you may need to use the -gpiochip nodes (possibly in conjunction with schematics) to determine -the correct GPIO number to use for a given signal. - - -Exporting from Kernel code --------------------------- -Kernel code can explicitly manage exports of GPIOs which have already been -requested using gpio_request():: - - /* export the GPIO to userspace */ - int gpio_export(unsigned gpio, bool direction_may_change); - - /* reverse gpio_export() */ - void gpio_unexport(); - - /* create a sysfs link to an exported GPIO node */ - int gpio_export_link(struct device *dev, const char *name, - unsigned gpio) - -After a kernel driver requests a GPIO, it may only be made available in -the sysfs interface by gpio_export(). The driver can control whether the -signal direction may change. This helps drivers prevent userspace code -from accidentally clobbering important system state. - -This explicit exporting can help with debugging (by making some kinds -of experiments easier), or can provide an always-there interface that's -suitable for documenting as part of a board support package. - -After the GPIO has been exported, gpio_export_link() allows creating -symlinks from elsewhere in sysfs to the GPIO sysfs node. Drivers can -use this to provide the interface under their own device in sysfs with -a descriptive name. - - -API Reference -============= - -The functions listed in this section are deprecated. The GPIO descriptor based -API should be used in new code. - -.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpio/gpiolib-legacy.c - :export: diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..894d88855d73 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +========================= +Using GPIO Lines in Linux +========================= + +The Linux kernel exists to abstract and present hardware to users. GPIO lines +as such are normally not user facing abstractions. The most obvious, natural +and preferred way to use GPIO lines is to let kernel hardware drivers deal +with them. + +For examples of already existing generic drivers that will also be good +examples for any other kernel drivers you want to author, refer to +Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst + +For any kind of mass produced system you want to support, such as servers, +laptops, phones, tablets, routers, and any consumer or office or business goods +using appropriate kernel drivers is paramount. Submit your code for inclusion +in the upstream Linux kernel when you feel it is mature enough and you will get +help to refine it, see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. + +In Linux GPIO lines also have a userspace ABI. + +The userspace ABI is intended for one-off deployments. Examples are prototypes, +factory lines, maker community projects, workshop specimen, production tools, +industrial automation, PLC-type use cases, door controllers, in short a piece +of specialized equipment that is not produced by the numbers, requiring +operators to have a deep knowledge of the equipment and knows about the +software-hardware interface to be set up. They should not have a natural fit +to any existing kernel subsystem and not be a good fit for an operating system, +because of not being reusable or abstract enough, or involving a lot of non +computer hardware related policy. + +Applications that have a good reason to use the industrial I/O (IIO) subsystem +from userspace will likely be a good fit for using GPIO lines from userspace as +well. + +Do not under any circumstances abuse the GPIO userspace ABI to cut corners in +any product development projects. If you use it for prototyping, then do not +productify the prototype: rewrite it using proper kernel drivers. Do not under +any circumstances deploy any uniform products using GPIO from userspace. + +The userspace ABI is a character device for each GPIO hardware unit (GPIO chip). +These devices will appear on the system as ``/dev/gpiochip0`` thru +``/dev/gpiochipN``. Examples of how to directly use the userspace ABI can be +found in the kernel tree ``tools/gpio`` subdirectory. + +For structured and managed applications, we recommend that you make use of the +libgpiod_ library. This provides helper abstractions, command line utilities +and arbitration for multiple simultaneous consumers on the same GPIO chip. + +.. _libgpiod: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git/ |