diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mm/damon')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/damon/api.rst | 20 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | 176 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst | 50 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst | 29 |
4 files changed, 275 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/api.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/api.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..08f34df45523 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/api.rst @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============= +API Reference +============= + +Kernel space programs can use every feature of DAMON using below APIs. All you +need to do is including ``damon.h``, which is located in ``include/linux/`` of +the source tree. + +Structures +========== + +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/damon.h + + +Functions +========= + +.. kernel-doc:: mm/damon/core.c diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0cff6fac6b7e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +====== +Design +====== + +Configurable Layers +=================== + +DAMON provides data access monitoring functionality while making the accuracy +and the overhead controllable. The fundamental access monitorings require +primitives that dependent on and optimized for the target address space. On +the other hand, the accuracy and overhead tradeoff mechanism, which is the core +of DAMON, is in the pure logic space. DAMON separates the two parts in +different layers and defines its interface to allow various low level +primitives implementations configurable with the core logic. We call the low +level primitives implementations monitoring operations. + +Due to this separated design and the configurable interface, users can extend +DAMON for any address space by configuring the core logics with appropriate +monitoring operations. If appropriate one is not provided, users can implement +the operations on their own. + +For example, physical memory, virtual memory, swap space, those for specific +processes, NUMA nodes, files, and backing memory devices would be supportable. +Also, if some architectures or devices support special optimized access check +primitives, those will be easily configurable. + + +Reference Implementations of Address Space Specific Monitoring Operations +========================================================================= + +The monitoring operations are defined in two parts: + +1. Identification of the monitoring target address range for the address space. +2. Access check of specific address range in the target space. + +DAMON currently provides the implementations of the operations for the physical +and virtual address spaces. Below two subsections describe how those work. + + +VMA-based Target Address Range Construction +------------------------------------------- + +This is only for the virtual address space monitoring operations +implementation. That for the physical address space simply asks users to +manually set the monitoring target address ranges. + +Only small parts in the super-huge virtual address space of the processes are +mapped to the physical memory and accessed. Thus, tracking the unmapped +address regions is just wasteful. However, because DAMON can deal with some +level of noise using the adaptive regions adjustment mechanism, tracking every +mapping is not strictly required but could even incur a high overhead in some +cases. That said, too huge unmapped areas inside the monitoring target should +be removed to not take the time for the adaptive mechanism. + +For the reason, this implementation converts the complex mappings to three +distinct regions that cover every mapped area of the address space. The two +gaps between the three regions are the two biggest unmapped areas in the given +address space. The two biggest unmapped areas would be the gap between the +heap and the uppermost mmap()-ed region, and the gap between the lowermost +mmap()-ed region and the stack in most of the cases. Because these gaps are +exceptionally huge in usual address spaces, excluding these will be sufficient +to make a reasonable trade-off. Below shows this in detail:: + + <heap> + <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 1> + <uppermost mmap()-ed region> + (small mmap()-ed regions and munmap()-ed regions) + <lowermost mmap()-ed region> + <BIG UNMAPPED REGION 2> + <stack> + + +PTE Accessed-bit Based Access Check +----------------------------------- + +Both of the implementations for physical and virtual address spaces use PTE +Accessed-bit for basic access checks. Only one difference is the way of +finding the relevant PTE Accessed bit(s) from the address. While the +implementation for the virtual address walks the page table for the target task +of the address, the implementation for the physical address walks every page +table having a mapping to the address. In this way, the implementations find +and clear the bit(s) for next sampling target address and checks whether the +bit(s) set again after one sampling period. This could disturb other kernel +subsystems using the Accessed bits, namely Idle page tracking and the reclaim +logic. DAMON does nothing to avoid disturbing Idle page tracking, so handling +the interference is the responsibility of sysadmins. However, it solves the +conflict with the reclaim logic using ``PG_idle`` and ``PG_young`` page flags, +as Idle page tracking does. + + +Address Space Independent Core Mechanisms +========================================= + +Below four sections describe each of the DAMON core mechanisms and the five +monitoring attributes, ``sampling interval``, ``aggregation interval``, +``update interval``, ``minimum number of regions``, and ``maximum number of +regions``. + + +Access Frequency Monitoring +--------------------------- + +The output of DAMON says what pages are how frequently accessed for a given +duration. The resolution of the access frequency is controlled by setting +``sampling interval`` and ``aggregation interval``. In detail, DAMON checks +access to each page per ``sampling interval`` and aggregates the results. In +other words, counts the number of the accesses to each page. After each +``aggregation interval`` passes, DAMON calls callback functions that previously +registered by users so that users can read the aggregated results and then +clears the results. This can be described in below simple pseudo-code:: + + while monitoring_on: + for page in monitoring_target: + if accessed(page): + nr_accesses[page] += 1 + if time() % aggregation_interval == 0: + for callback in user_registered_callbacks: + callback(monitoring_target, nr_accesses) + for page in monitoring_target: + nr_accesses[page] = 0 + sleep(sampling interval) + +The monitoring overhead of this mechanism will arbitrarily increase as the +size of the target workload grows. + + +Region Based Sampling +--------------------- + +To avoid the unbounded increase of the overhead, DAMON groups adjacent pages +that assumed to have the same access frequencies into a region. As long as the +assumption (pages in a region have the same access frequencies) is kept, only +one page in the region is required to be checked. Thus, for each ``sampling +interval``, DAMON randomly picks one page in each region, waits for one +``sampling interval``, checks whether the page is accessed meanwhile, and +increases the access frequency of the region if so. Therefore, the monitoring +overhead is controllable by setting the number of regions. DAMON allows users +to set the minimum and the maximum number of regions for the trade-off. + +This scheme, however, cannot preserve the quality of the output if the +assumption is not guaranteed. + + +Adaptive Regions Adjustment +--------------------------- + +Even somehow the initial monitoring target regions are well constructed to +fulfill the assumption (pages in same region have similar access frequencies), +the data access pattern can be dynamically changed. This will result in low +monitoring quality. To keep the assumption as much as possible, DAMON +adaptively merges and splits each region based on their access frequency. + +For each ``aggregation interval``, it compares the access frequencies of +adjacent regions and merges those if the frequency difference is small. Then, +after it reports and clears the aggregated access frequency of each region, it +splits each region into two or three regions if the total number of regions +will not exceed the user-specified maximum number of regions after the split. + +In this way, DAMON provides its best-effort quality and minimal overhead while +keeping the bounds users set for their trade-off. + + +Dynamic Target Space Updates Handling +------------------------------------- + +The monitoring target address range could dynamically changed. For example, +virtual memory could be dynamically mapped and unmapped. Physical memory could +be hot-plugged. + +As the changes could be quite frequent in some cases, DAMON allows the +monitoring operations to check dynamic changes including memory mapping changes +and applies it to monitoring operations-related data structures such as the +abstracted monitoring target memory area only for each of a user-specified time +interval (``update interval``). diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..dde7e2414ee6 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/faq.rst @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +========================== +Frequently Asked Questions +========================== + +Why a new subsystem, instead of extending perf or other user space tools? +========================================================================= + +First, because it needs to be lightweight as much as possible so that it can be +used online, any unnecessary overhead such as kernel - user space context +switching cost should be avoided. Second, DAMON aims to be used by other +programs including the kernel. Therefore, having a dependency on specific +tools like perf is not desirable. These are the two biggest reasons why DAMON +is implemented in the kernel space. + + +Can 'idle pages tracking' or 'perf mem' substitute DAMON? +========================================================= + +Idle page tracking is a low level primitive for access check of the physical +address space. 'perf mem' is similar, though it can use sampling to minimize +the overhead. On the other hand, DAMON is a higher-level framework for the +monitoring of various address spaces. It is focused on memory management +optimization and provides sophisticated accuracy/overhead handling mechanisms. +Therefore, 'idle pages tracking' and 'perf mem' could provide a subset of +DAMON's output, but cannot substitute DAMON. + + +Does DAMON support virtual memory only? +======================================= + +No. The core of the DAMON is address space independent. The address space +specific monitoring operations including monitoring target regions +constructions and actual access checks can be implemented and configured on the +DAMON core by the users. In this way, DAMON users can monitor any address +space with any access check technique. + +Nonetheless, DAMON provides vma/rmap tracking and PTE Accessed bit check based +implementations of the address space dependent functions for the virtual memory +and the physical memory by default, for a reference and convenient use. + + +Can I simply monitor page granularity? +====================================== + +Yes. You can do so by setting the ``min_nr_regions`` attribute higher than the +working set size divided by the page size. Because the monitoring target +regions size is forced to be ``>=page size``, the region split will make no +effect. diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..48c0bbff98b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +========================== +DAMON: Data Access MONitor +========================== + +DAMON is a data access monitoring framework subsystem for the Linux kernel. +The core mechanisms of DAMON (refer to :doc:`design` for the detail) make it + + - *accurate* (the monitoring output is useful enough for DRAM level memory + management; It might not appropriate for CPU Cache levels, though), + - *light-weight* (the monitoring overhead is low enough to be applied online), + and + - *scalable* (the upper-bound of the overhead is in constant range regardless + of the size of target workloads). + +Using this framework, therefore, the kernel's memory management mechanisms can +make advanced decisions. Experimental memory management optimization works +that incurring high data accesses monitoring overhead could implemented again. +In user space, meanwhile, users who have some special workloads can write +personalized applications for better understanding and optimizations of their +workloads and systems. + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + + faq + design + api |