diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | 44 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst index 5d3c3de3f4ec..1f5ab49c48a4 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ The important bits (aka "The TL;DR") is optional, but recommended): * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a line like ``#regzbot - introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions + introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) containing a paragraph like the following, which tells regzbot when the issue started to happen:: - #regzbot ^introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a + #regzbot ^introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a * When forwarding reports from a bug tracker to the regressions list (see above), include a paragraph like the following:: @@ -40,10 +40,13 @@ The important bits (aka "The TL;DR") #regzbot from: Some N. Ice Human <some.human@example.com> #regzbot monitor: http://some.bugtracker.example.com/ticket?id=123456789 -#. When submitting fixes for regressions, add "Link:" tags to the patch +#. When submitting fixes for regressions, add "Closes:" tags to the patch description pointing to all places where the issue was reported, as mandated by Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and - :ref:`Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst <development_posting>`. + :ref:`Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst <development_posting>`. If you are + only fixing part of the issue that caused the regression, you may use + "Link:" tags instead. regzbot currently makes no distinction between the + two. #. Try to fix regressions quickly once the culprit has been identified; fixes for most regressions should be merged within two weeks, but some need to be @@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" immediately start tracking the issue: * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a "regzbot command" like - ``#regzbot introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the + ``#regzbot introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) with a paragraph like the following::: #regzbot ^introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 @@ -91,10 +94,10 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot Note the caret (^) before the "introduced": it tells regzbot to treat the parent mail (the one you reply to) as the initial report for the regression you want to see tracked; that's important, as regzbot will later look out - for patches with "Link:" tags pointing to the report in the archives on + for patches with "Closes:" tags pointing to the report in the archives on lore.kernel.org. - * When forwarding a regressions reported to a bug tracker, include a paragraph + * When forwarding a regression reported to a bug tracker, include a paragraph with these regzbot commands:: #regzbot introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a @@ -102,7 +105,7 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot #regzbot monitor: http://some.bugtracker.example.com/ticket?id=123456789 Regzbot will then automatically associate patches with the report that - contain "Link:" tags pointing to your mail or the mentioned ticket. + contain "Closes:" tags pointing to your mail or the mentioned ticket. What's important when fixing regressions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -112,10 +115,14 @@ remember to do what Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst, :ref:`Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst <development_posting>`, and Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst already explain in more detail: - * Point to all places where the issue was reported using "Link:" tags:: + * Point to all places where the issue was reported using "Closes:" tags:: - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI/ - Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1234567890 + Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/30th.anniversary.repost@klaava.Helsinki.FI/ + Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1234567890 + + If you are only fixing part of the issue, you may use "Link:" instead as + described in the first document mentioned above. regzbot currently treats + both of these equivalently and considers the linked reports as resolved. * Add a "Fixes:" tag to specify the commit causing the regression. @@ -126,7 +133,7 @@ All this is expected from you and important when it comes to regression, as these tags are of great value for everyone (you included) that might be looking into the issue weeks, months, or years later. These tags are also crucial for tools and scripts used by other kernel developers or Linux distributions; one of -these tools is regzbot, which heavily relies on the "Link:" tags to associate +these tools is regzbot, which heavily relies on the "Closes:" tags to associate reports for regression with changes resolving them. Expectations and best practices for fixing regressions @@ -284,7 +291,7 @@ What else is there to known about regressions? Check out Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst, it covers a lot of other aspects you want might want to be aware of: - * the purpose of the "no regressions rule" + * the purpose of the "no regressions" rule * what issues actually qualify as regression @@ -326,7 +333,7 @@ How does regression tracking work with regzbot? The bot watches for replies to reports of tracked regressions. Additionally, it's looking out for posted or committed patches referencing such reports -with "Link:" tags; replies to such patch postings are tracked as well. +with "Closes:" tags; replies to such patch postings are tracked as well. Combined this data provides good insights into the current state of the fixing process. @@ -338,8 +345,7 @@ take care of that using ``#regzbot ^introduced``. For developers there normally is no extra work involved, they just need to make sure to do something that was expected long before regzbot came to light: add -"Link:" tags to the patch description pointing to all reports about the issue -fixed. +links to the patch description pointing to all reports about the issue fixed. Do I have to use regzbot? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @@ -398,9 +404,9 @@ By using a 'regzbot command' in a direct or indirect reply to the mail with the regression report. These commands need to be in their own paragraph (IOW: they need to be separated from the rest of the mail using blank lines). -One such command is ``#regzbot introduced <version or commit>``, which makes +One such command is ``#regzbot introduced: <version or commit>``, which makes regzbot consider your mail as a regressions report added to the tracking, as -already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced <version or commit>`` is another +already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced: <version or commit>`` is another such command, which makes regzbot consider the parent mail as a report for a regression which it starts to track. @@ -432,7 +438,7 @@ or itself is a reply to that mail: * Mark a regression as fixed by a commit that is heading upstream or already landed:: - #regzbot fixed-by: 1f2e3d4c5d + #regzbot fix: 1f2e3d4c5d * Mark a regression as a duplicate of another one already tracked by regzbot:: |