summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst10
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index efac910e2659..86d346bcb8ef 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -327,6 +327,8 @@ politely and address the problems they have pointed out. When sending a next
version, add a ``patch changelog`` to the cover letter or to individual patches
explaining difference against previous submission (see
:ref:`the_canonical_patch_format`).
+Notify people that commented on your patch about new versions by adding them to
+the patches CC list.
See Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for recommendations on email
clients and mailing list etiquette.
@@ -366,10 +368,10 @@ busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without comment,
but the development process works more smoothly than that now. You should
-receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
-that you have sent your patches to the right place. Wait for a minimum of
-one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer during
-busy times like merge windows.
+receive comments within a few weeks (typically 2-3); if that does not
+happen, make sure that you have sent your patches to the right place.
+Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers
+- possibly longer during busy times like merge windows.
It's also ok to resend the patch or the patch series after a couple of
weeks with the word "RESEND" added to the subject line::